Posted 25 November 2016 - 07:21 AM
Its actually quite depressing that a post I wrote got to the top, and that the Tops posting count is a whole two here, hardly followed Smedley's example over at S.O.E when he worked there.
I'm not really sure what to put, so I'm just going to ramble.
Do I believe the final word.
Frankly no, sadly it's the way business works, in many cases it's basically morally dishonest, but inside the law, and if the company is big enough they actively employ people to find ways to circumnavigate laws and taxes, that would put them in court.
Currently the British Home Secretary, Amber Rudd, the person in charge of chasing down off shore tax avoidance, and making them pay the fair share of business taxes, has a history of being a C.E.O in companies set up by her family and friends in tax havens and off shore accounts, a few going to the wall with massive debts.
So like that's ever going to happen
You can find the whole grizzly tale in an issue of Private Eye, sorry don't have an online account with the magazine to link you directly.
Back in the 80's when the U.S were first developing stealth bombers, one of them came down in I believe the Nevada desert, until the Pentagon issued a statement of we categorically deny the existence of a stealth aircraft, none actually knew for certain they were being developed but those making them.
You look at how HBS, NGNG, P.G.I, are all linked either formally or informally, I see no reason why it shouldn't be true, no matter how hard that is decried.
NGNG take a lot of flak here, NGNG are more than two people, and one does have to question why they put up with two of their high profile people on the pay roll of another company, I wouldn't stand for it, but that's my view, and I don't have to deal with it.
What has been made clear by Bombadils post about that interview being unscripted, is that the pod casts around here, are scripted and valueless.
What was apparent is the guy that was doing the interview is very good at his job, though I found his mannerism's very smarmy he got them both saying perhaps more than they should have been with a gentle stroking of ego's
Thing is, it never bothered me until that interview, it's how business is done, maybe it was the catalyst that's finally sparked my suppressed disgust with how this games been developed and the attitudes of those in control of it.
I'm not one of these people that needs an I hate you forever moment, hell when I gave up my 40 a day smoking habit, people didn't notice for nearly two weeks and that was 14 years ago same went for the booze, I went from six pints a day down to being virtually tea total I got a beer out the fridge I think it was four weeks ago now, much to the grumbling of my girl friend to drink it all so there's room for the Christmas food.
The 90 days, the island comments, they've all built up, the JJ nerfs, the map voting system, PSR introducing mechs that were clearly going to cause issues, then maximising those issues, with high hard point mounting, it's all effected my ability to get enjoyment out the game, and I should point out most of them happened after I.G.P.
These forums do magnify those feelings, I've never know for all the passion for a franchise, so much negativity, and as much as a lot of it is justified, a greater amount is deliberately stirred up by people with I hate P.G.I agenda, that want the game to fail for their own puerile gratification.
That said, I really am tired of big announcements, of the next big thing, promised in "The Fall" and getting half made features, and modes a week before Winter just to say look we did it on time !
I don't think I'm the only one on these forums, that still plays and pays, that is seeing Mechcon as make or break time, and it needs to be items with substance, and not just a power point of something vague in the future