Bushwacker Release Date Jan 24Th
#21
Posted 15 January 2017 - 11:40 PM
#22
Posted 16 January 2017 - 12:27 AM
Edited by S3dition, 16 January 2017 - 02:20 AM.
#25
Posted 16 January 2017 - 01:01 PM
#27
Posted 16 January 2017 - 01:07 PM
Dee Eight, on 16 January 2017 - 01:03 PM, said:
Soon we get a Leclerc MBT ?
Heavy Rifles get a -3 damage modifier when used against Mech Armor...
You'd probably be better off with a GAU8A Avenger mounted on a tracked chassis, as that would qualify as an Autocannon and not suffer any penalties.
#28
Posted 16 January 2017 - 01:31 PM
Prosperity Park, on 16 January 2017 - 01:07 PM, said:
You'd probably be better off with a GAU8A Avenger mounted on a tracked chassis, as that would qualify as an Autocannon and not suffer any penalties.
Considering the Leclerc has a 120mm smoothbore with an autoloader... I'd consider that an Autocannon... not a heavy rifle. Rifles were a lame attempt by some minor FASA writer to meet a deadline for a new supplement that needed "new" weapons and equipment in it. Catalyst in fact dropped them from the game when they published the CBT Tech Manual. Other things dropped as official by Catalyst included the Hyper-Velocity AC and Caseless AC, Laser anti-missile system, Glazed and Blazer armor, and other items. While Mech-Mortars as originally published were dropped, mortars were kept as infantry and battle armor equipment, as were recoilless rifles.
#29
Posted 16 January 2017 - 01:41 PM
Dee Eight, on 16 January 2017 - 01:31 PM, said:
Considering the Leclerc has a 120mm smoothbore with an autoloader... I'd consider that an Autocannon... not a heavy rifle. Rifles were a lame attempt by some minor FASA writer to meet a deadline for a new supplement that needed "new" weapons and equipment in it. Catalyst in fact dropped them from the game when they published the CBT Tech Manual. Other things dropped as official by Catalyst included the Hyper-Velocity AC and Caseless AC, Laser anti-missile system, Glazed and Blazer armor, and other items. While Mech-Mortars as originally published were dropped, mortars were kept as infantry and battle armor equipment, as were recoilless rifles.
Whaaaat? The HVAC is gone? But I like those......
#30
Posted 16 January 2017 - 01:41 PM
Dee Eight, on 16 January 2017 - 01:31 PM, said:
Considering the Leclerc has a 120mm smoothbore with an autoloader... I'd consider that an Autocannon... not a heavy rifle. Rifles were a lame attempt by some minor FASA writer to meet a deadline for a new supplement that needed "new" weapons and equipment in it. Catalyst in fact dropped them from the game when they published the CBT Tech Manual. Other things dropped as official by Catalyst included the Hyper-Velocity AC and Caseless AC, Laser anti-missile system, Glazed and Blazer armor, and other items. While Mech-Mortars as originally published were dropped, mortars were kept as infantry and battle armor equipment, as were recoilless rifles.
I thought lore clearly stated that rapid-fire autocannon (note Rapid) is better for steadily removing ablative armor than single solid slugs. Remember the Mackie's trial test run? Those Futuristic tanks fired massive slugs from 120-140mm barrels, and they bounced off the Machine's diamond-impregnated armor.
Nope, modern tanks would be sporting Heavy Rifles since there's no way they would even meet the performance of the tanks faced by Mackie.
It's actually a key factor in explaining the effective damage and ranges of BT Autocannons. If single slugs worked in the BT universe, then the AC/20 would be both the most powerful AND the longest ranged AC.
Instead, BT has burst-fire ACs and their damage and range are INVERSELY proportional because the size of the burst determines the damage output and the recoil generated by the burst (the effective blooming) determines effective range.
Edited by Prosperity Park, 16 January 2017 - 01:43 PM.
#31
Posted 16 January 2017 - 01:43 PM
5th Fedcom Rat, on 15 January 2017 - 11:28 PM, said:
It really should. Or, if they can't do that, go the MW4 route and put it where the hand is. I'd prefer it to be at the top of that thing it's at the bottom of right now, but I'll take MW4 Bushwacker if it means decently mounted AC10.
#32
Posted 16 January 2017 - 01:51 PM
Prosperity Park, on 16 January 2017 - 01:41 PM, said:
Nope, modern tanks would be sporting Heavy Rifles since there's no way they would even meet the performance of the tanks faced by Mackie.
It's actually a key factor in explaining the effective damage and ranges of BT Autocannons. If single slugs worked in the BT universe, then the AC/20 would be both the most powerful AND the longest ranged AC.
Instead, BT has burst-fire ACs and their damage and range are INVERSELY proportional because the size of the burst determines the damage output and the recoil generated by the burst (the effective blooming) determines effective range.
I thought it was because Rifles were too heavy compared to an autocannon, which could carry more ammo and make use of more specialized ammo as well. Heavy and Medium rifles can damage mechs. Light rifles can't. According to Sarna, a Heavy rifle does 9 damage and weighs 8 tons, which makes it better than an AC5 until you consider that it only carries 6 shots per ton.
#33
Posted 17 January 2017 - 08:41 AM
No... My Blue Shield.......
#34
Posted 17 January 2017 - 03:19 PM
#35
Posted 17 January 2017 - 04:16 PM
#36
Posted 18 January 2017 - 12:24 AM
#38
Posted 19 January 2017 - 07:37 AM
Ballistic on the arm's actually right where it's supposed to be.
Edited by Arkhangel, 19 January 2017 - 07:37 AM.
#39
Posted 19 January 2017 - 07:43 AM
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users