Fix Hunch-Iic, He Has Broken The Game.
#41
Posted 17 January 2017 - 02:56 AM
#42
Posted 17 January 2017 - 03:44 AM
Tristan Winter, on 17 January 2017 - 02:36 AM, said:
My whole point in mentioning the Marauder IIC in this context was to demonstrate that they do. They also used agility nerfs to de-power the KDK-3. Saying that they don't is demonstrably false.
#43
Posted 17 January 2017 - 03:47 AM
Escef, on 17 January 2017 - 03:44 AM, said:
Oh, never mind. I forgot who I was talking with for a moment there.
Yeah, they do a fantastic job, it's amazing. Later, Escef.
#44
Posted 17 January 2017 - 03:51 AM
Tristan Winter, on 17 January 2017 - 03:47 AM, said:
Yeah, they do a fantastic job, it's amazing. Later, Escef.
You agreed that they do after you said that they don't, then reiterated that they don't. If you want to say they should do it more, great, I can get behind that. But if you want to sit there and spread blatantly false information don't have the nerve to be insulted when someone calls you on it.
#45
Posted 17 January 2017 - 03:55 AM
Escef, on 17 January 2017 - 03:51 AM, said:
I'm not insulted, I'm bored.
#47
Posted 17 January 2017 - 04:32 AM
TercieI, on 16 January 2017 - 11:25 AM, said:
After the last nerf to the ac10's I actually switched to running 2x lbx10's on the Hunchie IIC. Wouldn't use it for scouting like that but I don't do much scouting anyway. I like it and this set up allows you to use two med lasers much more often. It probably isn't a better build but I think it is easy mode.
#48
Posted 17 January 2017 - 05:12 AM
Lupis Volk, on 16 January 2017 - 12:01 PM, said:
Over the holidays I have been in more than a few drops Clan side that despite facing decent opposition with a bunch of random Clan pugs, the Clan guys had the expectation to win and were irate over a loss. Openly saying things like they went Clan because they are supposed to be better and win all of the time. I heard this frustration so many times that I can imagine it is fairly common or at least it was with the influx of players who are not regulars to FW. So there are people playing Clan that openly want Clan to be better so they can win and are not interested in fair fights.
#49
Posted 17 January 2017 - 05:25 AM
Quicksilver Kalasa, on 16 January 2017 - 11:36 AM, said:
It used to be a fun robot, but the 10 seconds of downtime kinda killed the fun
The GaussPop is so much more satisfying,
#50
Posted 17 January 2017 - 05:27 AM
Mcgral18, on 17 January 2017 - 05:25 AM, said:
The GaussPop is so much more satisfying,
I'll counter that statement with a story.
I was in a dual gauss hunchback IIC and a friendly potato dropped an air strike on me
It crit me from behind and blew up both gauss rifles and I got teamkilled off a double side torso destruction
#51
Posted 17 January 2017 - 05:29 AM
MacClearly, on 17 January 2017 - 05:12 AM, said:
Over the holidays I have been in more than a few drops Clan side that despite facing decent opposition with a bunch of random Clan pugs, the Clan guys had the expectation to win and were irate over a loss. Openly saying things like they went Clan because they are supposed to be better and win all of the time. I heard this frustration so many times that I can imagine it is fairly common or at least it was with the influx of players who are not regulars to FW. So there are people playing Clan that openly want Clan to be better so they can win and are not interested in fair fights.
In the PuG FW drops I've been in I haven't heard that. The comments I had heard were, and I quote, "PGI loves IS and nerfed Clans again..." and "geez IS is OP these days...WTF?!? "
But that was the extent of it. Only during Invasion.
And of course it was in matches that were lost. But hey, win some, lose some. Name of the game.
Never really heard complaints during scouting missions about anything except for the occasional complaint about the decreased max weight for Clans.
Hadn't heard anyone making the "I changed to Clans recently because of {excuse goes here}" comment in any FW matches though
#53
Posted 17 January 2017 - 05:35 AM
Cathy, on 17 January 2017 - 05:32 AM, said:
lolling quietly?
Hehe, that did make me laugh.
I think these "xxxx is OP OMGZ BBQWTFBUSCUITS" threads should be closed off after a few days if there's no momentum.
The kdk3 thread was purposeful as it was clearly broken. How they fixed it... Ug.
#54
Posted 17 January 2017 - 05:35 AM
Snazzy Dragon, on 17 January 2017 - 05:27 AM, said:
I'll counter that statement with a story.
I was in a dual gauss hunchback IIC and a friendly potato dropped an air strike on me
It crit me from behind and blew up both gauss rifles and I got teamkilled off a double side torso destruction
Good news!
That cannot happen anymore. Recently, strikes stopped causing Crits
#55
Posted 17 January 2017 - 07:13 AM
Star Commander Horse, on 17 January 2017 - 05:29 AM, said:
But that was the extent of it. Only during Invasion.
And of course it was in matches that were lost. But hey, win some, lose some. Name of the game.
Never really heard complaints during scouting missions about anything except for the occasional complaint about the decreased max weight for Clans.
Hadn't heard anyone making the "I changed to Clans recently because of {excuse goes here}" comment in any FW matches though
I have heard those complaints as well.
Really though what I really want to see happen is the tier system and the group queue utilized with the exception of allowing single players the option to help fill the rosters of group players if they so choose.
Having matches where skill levels are at least more comparable would weed out some of the more frivolous and inaccurate claims.
Take the Kodiak. When it first came out and I was an even bigger potato than I am now, I actually thought people who were saying they were op were nuts. This is likely because I was running around in an Oxide in tier three coring out other potatos from behind and having a field day. It was like printing cbills at will. Then a couple of comp guys I knew who have been playing a long time told me I wasn't seeing the whole picture. Oh and then rescalening....
#56
Posted 17 January 2017 - 08:00 AM
You brought this on yourself. The 50 tonners were under utilized due to the stormcrow being the favored medium of choice. But the whiners got our scouting tonnage reduced to 50....now you get to deal with hunchies and huntsmen.
Here's an idea....get PGI to reduce clan scouting tonnage to 25 and increase the IS to 95. That way, you won't have to worry about all those nasty weapons that do damage to your trial mech.
#57
Posted 17 January 2017 - 08:27 AM
Snazzy Dragon, on 16 January 2017 - 11:18 AM, said:
But are they gamebreaking? Naw.
Hunchie IICs have massive side torso hitboxes and melt under fire. They also tend to have smaller engines and aren't very agile-- faster mediums and brawler builds will eat a hunchie IIC out of position alive. A single volley from an assault can cripple a hunchie IIC outright as well.
Kodiaks are well hated by the community and will be instantly focused-- they won't last long on the dakka builds because of the facetime required to do damage. They are pretty easy to core out as well because of how big their CT is, and they don't roll damage as well as they used to.
Exactly, my HBK 4G [F] will outduel HBK IIC's every, single, time.
just way better movement profile.
#59
Posted 17 January 2017 - 09:40 AM
Cathy, on 17 January 2017 - 05:32 AM, said:
Go ahead, laugh at me for pointing out the fool said they didn't do something that they do, in fact, do. After which he agreed that they do it, and then again said that they don't. Another one for the disrespect list, I guess. I suppose I should have added you to it 3 years ago when you started calling a c-bill ornage paintjob "gold", right?
Edited by Escef, 17 January 2017 - 09:46 AM.
#60
Posted 17 January 2017 - 10:29 AM
11 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 11 guests, 0 anonymous users