SuperFunkTron, on 28 January 2017 - 11:22 AM, said:
So I've started putting a spread sheet together based on those 5 army reports to get an idea of how the mechs look in relation to their clans. Because its 3025 it doesn't show everything we'd like, but is a great aide in the model system I'm working on that I hope I can some how present to PGI. Even if they would need to wait for CGL to release the all of the battle manuals so that the numbers match. I just really hope that the manuals address the preferred variants and battle tactics so coming up with ways to quirk the factions would be a little bit more clear, even if the quirks are incremental.
That reminds me, has anyone taken a look at the Mercs combat manual yet?
I, and probably a lot of people bought the Mercs manual when the Beta version came out, which allowed us all to download the full version when it became available. That's a great marketing tactic by CGL.
Let people buy the first version, get feedback from everyone that read it, fix any problems there might be, and then give everyone that bought the first version the fixed version for free as a thank you for helping them.
That said the Mercs manual is great for providing a detailed history of merc use from the Star League all the way to the Clan invasion, it's got rules for force building, including overviews of damn near all the big name Merc units from the Crescent Hawks to the Wolf's Dragoons.
It also includes a mini TRO for some of the new versions of the old "Unseen" mechs. Particularly the Locust, Ostscout, Shadow Hawk and Warhammer. They're breaking up the new versions of the Unseen mechs across all these new manuals.
For instance, the Warhammer, Marauder, Griffin and Shadow Hawk are featured on the cover of the Mercs manual, while the Wolverine, Locust and Phoenix Hawk are featured on the Kurita manual. I haven't bought the Kurita manual yet so I don't know which mechs are in the mini TRO for that book.
EDIT: Okay so I just bought the Kurita manual, the mini TRO covers the Wasp, Phoenix Hawk, Wolverine and Battlemaster.
SuperFunkTron, on 28 January 2017 - 05:08 PM, said:
I am looking at this great assignment chart I came across in the battletech forum b
ut I need a little help deciphering a few things.
https://dl.dropboxus...ables%209.1.pdf
edit:
As I was typing this I think i just put together why there are two 3-digit number sequences in the D1000 column (please someone confirm that those are number ranges).
My biggest question out of this is, "can the number of each mech available in each faction be determined from this document?" Realized exact numbers don't exist anywhere. Figu
Another question only vaguely related to this document, "Is there a website other than sarna that provides information regarding each of the mechs?" To be a little more clear, I'm looking for something like the short data entries on Sarna or the old CCG cards. Its not necessary, but would be nice to be able to have a cross reference to the massive lists of mechs and provide some story behind the mech (in this case, a sentence may be story enough).
Last pressing question for now, "Are the filtered lists on MUL accurate in relation to mechs that were exclusive to factions and mechs that were widely available?
Also, does MUL have any resource giving the number of mechs in each faction?".
I've now got an idea for 2
3different models of Faction Specific mechs, each a little more in depth than the previous, and I'd like to eventually share it with you guys for feedback and discussion of their viability, but I'd like to be as accurate a possible from the get go. I'd really love to have PGI start layering the lore into FP, even if it is only a little at a time to help ensure balance.
As far as the part in bold here, no, there is no resource for how many mechs a specific faction could have due to the fact that they have literally THOUSANDS of them. Tens of Thousands maybe. A Battlemech Regiment is a minimum of 108 to a maximum of 180 mechs, and every major house as at least several dozen regiments easily.
I wouldn't worry too much about the MUL, as that's a literal metric shitton of data to pour through and it can get overwhelming pretty easily.
Edited by Alan Davion, 28 January 2017 - 07:41 PM.