Jump to content

Upcoming Update To The Skill Tree PTS Build


105 replies to this topic

#1 Alexander Garden

    Producer

  • Developer
  • Developer
  • 1,510 posts

Posted 10 February 2017 - 03:51 PM

Greetings all,

The Skill Tree PTS has been live for just a couple days now, and we're fortunate to have received a lot of great feedback. The reception to the overall framework of the new Skill Tree has been positive, but it's clear there are ways to improve the implementation.
The feature obviously represents a big change; we want and value your feedback to help ensure it is also a positive one.

We're in the planning process for an update to the PTS build in an effort to address some of the more common pieces of feedback we've received so far. We'll hold off on providing full details for what you'll see in the update until everything is solid, but we'll get a proper post up for you detailing all of the changes as soon as possible.

We'd also like to inform everyone that while the Skill Tree was initially slated for a release in our upcoming patch on February 21st, we are now targeting a release for the March 21st patch to ensure sufficient time for iteration and improvement on the PTS client.

In the meantime, keep testing, discussing, and providing your feedback. We strongly believe that with your help, the new Skill Tree will be a positive and significant addition to the game.

#2 Cato Zilks

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Hero of Marik
  • Hero of Marik
  • 698 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • LocationPrinceton, NJ

Posted 10 February 2017 - 04:15 PM

I will help organize feedback into folders to reduce overlap if somebody can give me permissions.

#3 Colonel ONeill

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The God
  • The God
  • 662 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationGermany

Posted 10 February 2017 - 04:27 PM

View PostCato Zilks, on 10 February 2017 - 04:15 PM, said:

I will help organize feedback into folders to reduce overlap if somebody can give me permissions.

We use buckets over here

#4 Big Tin Man

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Rage
  • Rage
  • 1,957 posts

Posted 10 February 2017 - 04:40 PM

View PostAlexander Garden, on 10 February 2017 - 03:51 PM, said:

now targeting a release for the March 21st patch to ensure sufficient time for iteration and improvement on the PTS client.


Great decision. The firestorm of posts should be a sign, we're here and we care.

#5 Cy Mitchell

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Privateer
  • The Privateer
  • 2,688 posts

Posted 10 February 2017 - 04:47 PM

Great to know that you are listening and preparing to address the players concerns in a timely manner. Delaying it a month is a good choice considering the depth of impact it will have on the game. There is a lot to like there and a few concerns. I am just glad the work to improve it is ongoing and there is no talk of scrapping it.

#6 Haji1096

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 339 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • LocationAlexandria, VA

Posted 10 February 2017 - 04:57 PM

It doesn't seem like the design team plays MWO when they design new mechanisms for it.

Everything is ham-fisted and doesn't even come close to realizing the stated goals when a new idea is implemented.

See Energy Draw and the Map change as evidence.

Edited by Haji1096, 10 February 2017 - 04:59 PM.


#7 Riitters

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 26 posts

Posted 10 February 2017 - 04:58 PM

Hey, good to hear.
Thank you guys for pushing it back a hair to have more time to iterate on it.

#8 Sky Hawk

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 700 posts
  • LocationDeep Periphery, aka Hungary

Posted 10 February 2017 - 05:04 PM

I'm 100% for the more testing... It's to big stuff for rushing it... But... I am a bit curious.. usually the monthly MWO paches are hard locked in the last 2-3 weeks... Can you even manage a solid new patch in the next 10 days?..

Edited by Sky Hawk, 10 February 2017 - 05:04 PM.


#9 Duncan1dah0

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Crusader
  • The Crusader
  • 375 posts
  • LocationWazan, Zion Cluster

Posted 10 February 2017 - 05:11 PM

Good. I like it that you are listening. Now it is on us to offer up positive and constructive feedback. Thanks PGI for listening.

#10 Malrock

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Widow Maker
  • The Widow Maker
  • 313 posts

Posted 10 February 2017 - 05:28 PM

Is there a time frame on when the new PTS build will be up?

#11 Andi Nagasia

    Volunteer Moderator

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 5,982 posts

Posted 10 February 2017 - 05:46 PM

View PostMalrock, on 10 February 2017 - 05:28 PM, said:

Is there a time frame on when the new PTS build will be up?

hoping soon, cant wait to test Skill Tree Vs2, ;)

#12 Bombast

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 7,709 posts

Posted 10 February 2017 - 05:50 PM

Didn't take long for the Skill Tree to shrivel up and swear this has never happened before, did it?

Still, can't complain. I'd rather they wait a month and redo the math than release it in full on 'It's cold outside' mode.

Edited by Bombast, 10 February 2017 - 05:51 PM.


#13 Exard3k

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The God of Death
  • The God of Death
  • 1,010 posts
  • LocationEast Frisia in Germany

Posted 10 February 2017 - 05:56 PM

Reasonable. Can't wait for the new build :)

#14 shopsmart

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 294 posts

Posted 10 February 2017 - 05:56 PM

Good choice and release with new tech and everything will be gold.

#15 WolvesX

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Machete
  • The Machete
  • 2,072 posts

Posted 10 February 2017 - 05:58 PM

Please make respec without costs and don't force us to take skills nodes we don't want.

#16 JonDoeIowa

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Little Helper
  • Little Helper
  • 89 posts
  • LocationIowa

Posted 10 February 2017 - 06:14 PM

Alex can we please have consideration to the idea of moving the ability to enter the testing ground into the mech lab and skill tree so before saving and committing our cbills and xp we can at least take them into the game and try them.

I have a write up in the pts feedback thread on it.

Thank you

#17 Deathlike

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Littlest Helper
  • Littlest Helper
  • 29,240 posts
  • Location#NOToTaterBalance #BadBalanceOverlordIsBad

Posted 10 February 2017 - 06:14 PM

It's actually appalling to think that most of what we see on the PTS would have been live on patch day.

#18 Navid A1

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2022 Gold Champ
  • CS 2022 Gold Champ
  • 4,950 posts

Posted 10 February 2017 - 07:49 PM

All I ask is for PGI to:

- avoid knee-jerk reactions
- use common sense.
- balance based on gameplay and gameplay only. Forget about raw numbers

#19 Kojak Bear

    Member

  • PipPip
  • The Tip of the Spear
  • The Tip of the Spear
  • 44 posts

Posted 10 February 2017 - 07:54 PM

Here's a long,detailed list of my recommendations on the Skill Tree System. Please read, share and feedback. Thanks.

https://drive.google...N3NUMEx2MmhUNE0

One other note: PGI should give us the option to pay a one-time fee of XXXX C-Bills (maybe 4 million?) and YYYY XP (20,000?) or even the equivalent MC's (maybe 100? 200?), after which we get to enjoy UNLIMITED FREE re-specs. That way, the grind is more feasible and we get all customization opportunities after hurdling the pay wall. This will also encourage people to buy premium time to grind out the C-Bills/XP for the goal of free re-specs.

#20 Lukoi Banacek

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • WC 2018 Top 12 Qualifier
  • WC 2018 Top 12 Qualifier
  • 4,353 posts

Posted 10 February 2017 - 08:20 PM

Great news. Look forward to the new iterative changes. Been an interesting concept so far, just need different math values for the costs to start.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users