Countdown To Supernova Release Feb 21St
#21
Posted 15 February 2017 - 11:53 AM
#22
Posted 15 February 2017 - 12:14 PM
Otherwise the pic makes the supernova look like a blimp.
#23
Posted 15 February 2017 - 12:22 PM
#24
Posted 15 February 2017 - 12:36 PM
#25
Posted 15 February 2017 - 01:09 PM
Luscious Dan, on 15 February 2017 - 12:22 PM, said:
My 3 PPC Awesomes and future 3 LPL Supernovas salute you!
#26
Posted 15 February 2017 - 01:17 PM
I have a question. What do you think about the different dynamic weapon geometries on some of the earlier mechs?
Are there any chance that some of the worst offenders get a remodel (aka gigantic Timber wolf secondary missile boxes no matter what missile size is equipped)
Also, Good job on the supernova model. Hope the animators follow suit as well.
#27
Posted 15 February 2017 - 01:54 PM
Navid A1, on 15 February 2017 - 01:17 PM, said:
I have a question. What do you think about the different dynamic weapon geometries on some of the earlier mechs?
Are there any chance that some of the worst offenders get a remodel (aka gigantic Timber wolf secondary missile boxes no matter what missile size is equipped)
Also, Good job on the supernova model. Hope the animators follow suit as well.
I'd rather see them do the sensible thing that MW4 and MWLL did and make the missile pods separate from the torsos with fixed "bonus" armor value that can't be changed and doesn't effect the overall max number of armor bits on the mech. Those big old ears are one of things that "make" the Timber Wolf visually, and not having them feels like sacrilege. But with them part of the ST hitbox, it also makes the TBR (and similar mechs like the Mauler and Bushwacker) a lot more fragile if you take them.
Edited by Sidefire, 15 February 2017 - 01:55 PM.
#28
Posted 15 February 2017 - 02:10 PM
#30
Posted 15 February 2017 - 02:21 PM
Sidefire, on 15 February 2017 - 01:54 PM, said:
That would be a dream come true. But PGI will never do it. EVER!
Just gonna put this here as something to look at for future mechs:
#31
Posted 15 February 2017 - 02:39 PM
Only reason I bought the upgrade was because that (S) camo was so perdy, and to be honest, I'm a little disappointed by the screenshot. Hopefully they put up some better shots of her.
#32
Posted 15 February 2017 - 03:21 PM
#33
Posted 15 February 2017 - 05:17 PM
Thunder Child, on 15 February 2017 - 02:39 PM, said:
Only reason I bought the upgrade was because that (S) camo was so perdy, and to be honest, I'm a little disappointed by the screenshot. Hopefully they put up some better shots of her.
Scorch would like to have a word with you about bad paint jobs...though that SNV-1(S) could use a few more stars.
#34
Posted 15 February 2017 - 05:50 PM
Though, not seen in that picture is half a second later after firing 6 CERLLs simultaneously the SuperNova lives up to its name due to heat overload....
#35
Posted 15 February 2017 - 05:52 PM
Navid A1, on 15 February 2017 - 02:21 PM, said:
That would be a dream come true. But PGI will never do it. EVER!
Just gonna put this here as something to look at for future mechs:
That "LRM 15" in the side torso looks horrible... I preffer PGI's one over it.
However the right side drawing is to my liking.
#37
Posted 15 February 2017 - 05:54 PM
Bandilly, on 15 February 2017 - 05:17 PM, said:
Scorch would like to have a word with you about bad paint jobs...though that SNV-1(S) could use a few more stars.
What? Really? I love Scorch's paintjob o_o
You want terrible paint, look at the Grid Iron.. Okay, I'm just not a football fan... Objectively bad paint would be any of the Clan omnimechs sans a special pattern... 90% gunmetal grey, with a few bands of color... Alright, fair enough, in lore clans didn't like waste, and throwing a bunch of paint at mechs probably wasn't top of their concern list, but still...
#38
Posted 15 February 2017 - 06:08 PM
Luscious Dan, on 15 February 2017 - 12:22 PM, said:
Well in the PTS awhile ago for the ghost heat replacement from what I can see mechs can be quirked to have different thresholds and thus fire more or less weapons so we could see that happen.
#39
Posted 15 February 2017 - 07:02 PM
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users