242 replies to this topic

[Peter Overheater]

I bought the full pack of the Mad Cat MKII, and i have to say i am very disappointed about the look of the model. The forward-facing sleek design of the Concept artwork has to be kept imo, the 3D model looks like this to me :



The Arms and Cockpit definately have to get longer, there is no dynamic anymore like in the concept art.

[CK16]

Yea, hoping to hear word soon on this of what is possible.

[CK16]

bump

[Snowbluff]

CK16, on 07 May 2017 - 07:21 PM, said:

bump

There there we're here for you, valuable Ghost Bear Customer.

[Imperius]

You can do it Arman we have faith in you ! Pic related if you watch anime.

Edited by Imperius, 07 May 2017 - 08:02 PM.

[Bishop Steiner]

CK16, on 07 May 2017 - 07:21 PM, said:

bump

[CK16]

https://youtu.be/rn_ZVtLsu00
>.>

[BumbleBee]

Peter Overheater, on 05 May 2017 - 03:53 AM, said:

I bought the full pack of the Mad Cat MKII, and i have to say i am very disappointed about the look of the model. The forward-facing sleek design of the Concept artwork has to be kept imo, the 3D model looks like this to me :



The Arms and Cockpit definately have to get longer, there is no dynamic anymore like in the concept art.

And yet I would totally own that MicroMachine

[Xetelian]

This getting fixed yet?

[Imperius]

He said nothing will be shown in until what could be changed gets changed. Sucks I agree I'm seriously holding back from being this guy : P

Edited by Imperius, 10 May 2017 - 07:34 PM.

[Snowbluff]

Say it with me!

The arms are too short!
The Cockpit is too bulbous!
This is the direwolf torso all over again!

[CK16]

Gauss rifles to far out/long?

[Snowbluff]

CK16, on 10 May 2017 - 05:56 AM, said:

Gauss rifles to far out/long?

The "Rifle" is fine where it is. The length of the arm should be extended to cover it properly.

Edited by Snowbluff, 10 May 2017 - 06:10 AM.

[CK16]

https://mwomercs.com...justments-poll/

[Snowbluff]

CK16, on 10 May 2017 - 06:21 AM, said:

https://mwomercs.com...justments-poll/

Voted and forwarded to RestosIII and Imperius

[Bishop Steiner]

CK16, on 10 May 2017 - 06:21 AM, said:

https://mwomercs.com...justments-poll/

too ambiguous.

YOu have options, you should post it by category, like
1- Needs adjustment
1) Are the arms too:
a) thick
short and stubby
c) too low
2) is the CT/Cockpit
a) too bulbuous
other issue
3) legs too:
a) Skinny

etc

and of course
4) no, it's fine as it is.

[CK16]

Thought abut that, just at work will have to when I get home.

[Snowbluff]

Bishop Steiner, on 10 May 2017 - 10:02 AM, said:

too ambiguous.

YOu have options, you should post it by category, like
1- Needs adjustment
1) Are the arms too:
a) thick
short and stubby
c) too low
2) is the CT/Cockpit
a) too bulbuous
other issue
3) legs too:
a) Skinny

etc

and of course
4) no, it's fine as it is.

Agreed, there isn't enough "arms are too stubby" representation in the poll.

[CK16]

That was pretty uncalled for...There is no problem pointing out a few issues we see with the model, this isn't even the first time the community has said something and sometimes they will adjust the model to our suggestions....Nice try trolling though

[Metus regem]

Roughneck Cobra, on 10 May 2017 - 11:38 AM, said:

Nah I just see a bunch of ungrateful shites, plenty of mechs aint even been put on the board folks pine over and might not even see, should be thankful its out, in general, but when you cry about the model, not the paintjob or even wait for the finish product, ugh, I hate having stand on PGI's side over it but you are just being sweet 16 brats.

That said, least it keeps you all busy.

To be fair, this isn't the first time there has been constructive critiques of PGI designs, and sometimes they actually take those changes and apply them, provided we don't act like spoiled little brats about it...

Take the Warhammer for instance, when PGI first showed the model for it, it was going to have a very, very prominent head, unlike any of the art work to-date for it. PGI listened and we got a much better looking head and mech for it.

On the flip side, people acted rather ungrateful about the Enforcer's head.... and PGI did nothing.

So in short, it is about approaching the subject rationally and calmly that is important, it also opens the door for better Dev-Player communication. Also things like this, when PGI listens, helps to foster a feeling of them actually taking what we say with any form of legitimacy. Perhaps one day they may even listen to some of the more game mechanics educated members on things like balance, rather than playing with a dart board or roulette wheel....