I_AM_ZUUL, on 05 May 2017 - 04:05 AM, said:
actually it fits perfectly... the USA was dropping nukes on Japan in a Just War, where we were fighting against an aggressor who attacked us first. You live in a delusional wonderland if you think human nature works that way... nukes and bioweapons would have come out as the Clans won more. As a society is stressed it resorts to ever more desperate measures... now the Inner Sphere went through a normal destructive period in the 1st Succession War but it was kept in an ever decreasing state by the hideous cancer hiding in its center called Comstar. Comstar is wholly responsible for the Inner Sphere not recovering & advancing like they should have naturally (hence what makes them the Catholic Church that kept Europe in the Dark Ages for a 1000 years)... the Clans could not militarily conquer the whole of the Inner Sphere, it is so far beyond their material resources that it is laughable at best and sad that you think given the information provided that they could have since it shows a severe lack of critical thinking skills on your part.
Since Kerensky left explicit instructions that the "Clans" were supposed to be disbanded and restored to a functional Democracy not a Totalitarian Military Caste system, that all the Khans when they opened his letter promptly destroyed and never followed. Then your premise about a "golden age of humanity" being found under a Totalitarian State is so terrible that I am quite literally horrified that you express it, yet the 20th century taught us through the 100s of millions of lives lost what truly catastrophic ideas they are, people are still expressing them in the 21st century about how Socialism/Communism is going to work this time.
2 things to understand here. 1st the USA in the use of the nuclear bomb probably didn't understand the destructive power (it being so far beyond conventional weapons) and on realising they were the only ones in control of the destructive power rightly repeated the show of overwhelming force to bring to an end the war. (this however is not important, but I always think it worth pointing out that the first time you actually use something that is so new and powerful like a nuke it is a shock even if you intellectually know the power)
Secondly (more importantly) I wouldn't single out socialism/communism. Socialism is a very broad category of political/ economic theory and has worked reasonably well in parts of the world like the Nordic Model.
Communism I believe is clearly a busted flush and takes little account of human nature.
The reality is that Communism (as seen in the USSR) was little more than a one party state dictatorship. The lives lost in the USSR are due to the dictators there.
I would point out that Nationalism (especially in Europe) killed about 100 million people in the 2 world wars. And yet we currently find ourselves repeating the same isolationist nationalist rhetoric that lead us there in the past.
Neither extreme of politics really works. They both simply give you someone to hate. The leaders then use your hate to give them power over you in the guise of given themselves power over those you're told to hate.
So don't just single out the DICtators on the left but also point out the DICtators on the right too
The dull middle of the road (less dramatic) politics that we previously had ground out progress slowly and by consensus but with less loss of life and liberty. But you know this stuff isn't the entertainment that the news demands now.
http://www.historypl...story/genocide/