davoodoo, on 22 July 2017 - 07:33 AM, said:
all negated by spread damage which makes it at best 10+5+5 weapon which makes it competition to ac10
which got lower cooldown, double range and lower tonnage/cirts, velocity is still lower but that hardly matters at 270m on which lb20x operates.
Comparing it to an AC10 is a bit of a stretch. LB20X is going to be hitting single components within 100m, and deals
significantly more damage to unarmored components (should deal ~26 dmg on average vs. unarmored components if we extrapolate from LB10X). LB20X also has higher DPS per ton, and the shorter cooldown of AC10 actually works against it as a brawler since twisting off damage will drop your DPS more significantly.
If AC20 and LB20X had the same fitting, the advantages of LB20X would bring it forward in many situations. It is just outright better at swatting lights and shredding damaged mechs later into the game, for instance. Twin LB20X also has much better quality of life with lower heat and no ghost heat penalty. Even if easier fitting wouldn't make it a top-tier weapon choice vs. PPFLD, taking it would still be pretty reasonable.
Fitting is the primary barrier to its viability right now. Only the Annihilator can reasonably take it thanks to very low engine cap and ballistic hardpoints in each torso. Even even most Maulers would be sacrificing top speed. It's just straight up not viable on anything else.
Edited by Aggravated Assault Mech, 22 July 2017 - 11:14 AM.