138 replies to this topic

[LordFatman]

Aramuside, on 11 August 2017 - 04:07 AM, said:

Have to say that when I play FW as a PuG odds are I will lose and the rewards on a loss are very weak so my only incentive to play is either loyalty (in which case i'd probably be a loyalist and fighting in a team anyway) or learn/relearn the mode. Its why most of us need incentive to put up with being repeatedly rolled by 12 mans so only play during events.

Its sad when I just pray to meet fellow pugs on the other side so we at least have a chance.

and if rewards were better for losing side even if not cbill just loyalty point because even if we lose were we are still in the fight being loyal just maybe it would help with clans ghost drops

Edited by LordFatman, 11 August 2017 - 08:46 AM.

[justcallme A S H]

Mycroft000, on 11 August 2017 - 08:15 AM, said:

In that case maybe they simply keep an invisible tally going that once you get X KMDDs on any specific mech based on the total C-Bill cost of that mech, you get to salvage that chassis. This is just pie in the sky brainstorming. Anything that makes salvage a bigger part of the rewards would be great for making it feel more like Mechwarrior and Battletech.

But also alter gameplay that is not inline with a FPS. So, no.

[A Shoddy Rental Mech]

The Nerf Bat, on 09 August 2017 - 06:44 AM, said:

7/19 clans owned 272 planets
7/21 clans owned 272 planets
7/22 clans owned 268 planets (lost 4 planets)
7/23 clans owned 268 planets
7/24 clans owned 264 planets (lost 4 planets)
7/25 clans owned 264 planets
7/27 clans owned 244 planets (lost 20 planets)
7/30 clans owned 244 planets
8/01 clans owned 240 planets (lost 4 planets)
8/02 clans owned 236 planets (lost 4 planets)
8/06 clans owned 248 planets (won 12 planets)
8/07 clans owned 252 planets (won 4 planets)
8/9 clans owned 268 planets (won 12 planets)

It took 2 weeks for the I.S. to take 36 planets, it only took a week for the clans*cough*mercs*cough* to take them back.

8/12 clans owned 288 planets (won 20 planets)

Clans are now +16 planets since the start of the "invasion era".

All without a single tonnage change.

[Charles Sennet]

The Nerf Bat, on 12 August 2017 - 06:47 AM, said:

8/12 clans owned 288 planets (won 20 planets)

Clans are now +16 planets since the start of the "invasion era".

All without a single tonnage change.

Again, its where the units are and has little to do with balance. IS was taking planets when the units were over there. We need a game mode that is not balanced for population and is, instead, balanced for unit-v-unit play. Right now 300 IS advantage (despite getting CW tech) is far too much to achieve this.

[White Heat]

Reduce the IS tonnage please, I'm tired of dealing with giant waves of assaults with a million HP each. And now they've been given ER large lasers the main advantage clans had before is gone.

[LordLeto]

IS has always had ERLarges.

[LordFatman]

The only way to make this game even is to make everything the same weight weapons do same dam and weigh same range engine ect light same as xl and every one get same weapons and perks on mechs. Then it will only be about game play your build and teamwork ( not weapons and tons )

[justcallme A S H]

Robot ******, on 13 August 2017 - 09:22 AM, said:

Reduce the IS tonnage please, I'm tired of dealing with giant waves of assaults with a million HP each. And now they've been given ER large lasers the main advantage clans had before is gone.

Lol WUT?

[Vxheous]

Robot ******, on 13 August 2017 - 09:22 AM, said:

Reduce the IS tonnage please, I'm tired of dealing with giant waves of assaults with a million HP each. And now they've been given ER large lasers the main advantage clans had before is gone.

At one point (way before Civil War update) with IS range over-quirking, IS ERLL had 911m+ range.....

Edited by Vxheous Kerensky, 13 August 2017 - 03:41 PM.

[MNML86]

Charles Sennet, on 13 August 2017 - 07:49 AM, said:

Again, its where the units are and has little to do with balance. IS was taking planets when the units were over there. We need a game mode that is not balanced for population and is, instead, balanced for unit-v-unit play. Right now 300 IS advantage (despite getting CW tech) is far too much to achieve this.

Lordfatman has answered this.

Robot ******, on 13 August 2017 - 09:22 AM, said:

Reduce the IS tonnage please, I'm tired of dealing with giant waves of assaults with a million HP each. And now they've been given ER large lasers the main advantage clans had before is gone.

LordLeto has answered this.

Just to put the cherry on top with what every clanner says to an IS whiner "git gud"

If you are still having problems as a clanner winning consistently refer my above statement.

[Leggin Ho]

MNML86, on 13 August 2017 - 05:14 PM, said:

Lordfatman has answered this.



LordLeto has answered this.

Just to put the cherry on top with what every clanner says to an IS whiner "git gud"

If you are still having problems as a clanner winning consistently refer my above statement.

While I think the tonnage for the IS is alittle (10 -15 tons sounds about right) the thing about this thread that cracks me up the most are you W/L of ..36 to tell anyone to "git gud".

If your still having problems understanding why I think it's funny, please see your own statement above since as a Clanner loyalist you still have not won consistently.

Please add idea's and suggestions, but to make stupid comment's like that is just funny as hell.

Edited by Leggin Ho, 13 August 2017 - 05:53 PM.

[MNML86]

Leggin Ho, on 13 August 2017 - 05:39 PM, said:

While I think the tonnage for the IS is alittle (10 -15 tons sounds about right) the thing about this thread that cracks me up the most are you W/L of ..36 to tell anyone to "git gud".

If your still having problems understanding why I think it's funny, please see your own statement above since as a Clanner loyalist you still have not won consistently.

Please add idea's and suggestions, but to make stupid comment's like that is just funny as hell.

I'm a casual IS/merc player actually. Joined the new clans to get the free mech bays. Pokemon got to get them all when I'm free.

Do you have a job? Considering that you have so much time to actually bother to check someone?

I have already made a few suggestions here and there.

Was trying to trigger the local SJWs and snowflakes, it's fun seeing them jump up and down. Seems I hooked one.



Edit: Thanks for telling me my W/L ratio. I honestly didn't know.
https://static.mwomercs.com/forums//public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.png https://static.mwomercs.com/forums//public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.png https://static.mwomercs.com/forums//public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.png

Edited by MNML86, 13 August 2017 - 11:03 PM.

[Fuerchtenichts]

MNML86, on 13 August 2017 - 10:57 PM, said:

Was trying to trigger the local SJWs and snowflakes, it's fun seeing them jump up and down. Seems I hooked one.


https://static.mwomercs.com/forums//public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.png https://static.mwomercs.com/forums//public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.png https://static.mwomercs.com/forums//public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.png

yeah, it is just a question what your priorities are

[Leggin Ho]

Well as I work around 60 hours a week and play a few games a day when I have time in the evenings, I'm pretty causal about play time myself, which is whats so funny about those of you making abrasive comments to folks when you don't even play or you play poorly. Your stats took all of 20 seconds to find, of course if you knew more about CW you'd have known that too so thanks again for making my point for me.

Edited by Leggin Ho, 14 August 2017 - 10:35 AM.

[MNML86]

Leggin Ho, on 14 August 2017 - 10:35 AM, said:

Well as I work around 60 hours a week and play a few games a day when I have time in the evenings, I'm pretty causal about play time myself, which is whats so funny about those of you making abrasive comments to folks when you don't even play or you play poorly. Your stats took all of 20 seconds to find, of course if you knew more about CW you'd have known that too so thanks again for making my point for me.

If you call that an abrasive comment you haven't been to the forums much. There have been much worse being tossed around.

To make things clear these are not my words but the words of clanners and elitists which was said to others. Read my post carefully.

"Just to put the cherry on top with what every clanner says to an IS whiner "git gud"

This did not originate from me I just copy paste from what they said.

I believe you yourself know who some of those elitists are.

I knew how to check the stats I just couldn't be bothered. Especially to actually take the time to go and check some random poster's stats. You really have so much time. I'm jealous of your priorities.

To Fuerchtenichts the clans currently at least, are the most infested with SJWs, snowflakes and elitists. It's good to nudge them once and awhile to see how they react. Check youtube for some fun.

[Fuerchtenichts]

MNML86, on 15 August 2017 - 05:55 PM, said:

To Fuerchtenichts the clans currently at least, are the most infested with SJWs, snowflakes and elitists. It's good to nudge them once and awhile to see how they react. Check youtube for some fun.

Where you see "SJWs, snowflakes and elitists" I see much more divergence in a faction population. In the end it doesn't matter which faction you are on. Just combine every subitem of "Player Quality" and "Player Group" and you will get a different perception of FP.


Player Quality:

• I refuse to learn
  
• i am not able to improve
  
• I am bad
  
• I just started to play the game
  
• I use other players as meat shields
  
• I manage to make it on my own
  
• I am able to cooperate with others
  
• I am a team player in an organized group

Player Group:

• Solo Player (Loyalist/Mercenary)
  
• Organised Loyalist (casual/committed)
  
• Organised Mercenary (casual/committed)

Edited by Fuerchtenichts, 16 August 2017 - 06:40 AM.

[MNML86]

Leggin Ho, on 13 August 2017 - 05:39 PM, said:

While I think the tonnage for the IS is alittle (10 -15 tons sounds about right) the thing about this thread that cracks me up the most are you W/L of ..36 to tell anyone to "git gud".

If your still having problems understanding why I think it's funny, please see your own statement above since as a Clanner loyalist you still have not won consistently.

Please add idea's and suggestions, but to make stupid comment's like that is just funny as hell.

Leggin Ho you need to go and check your eyes. You may need new spectacles. I was curious and checked my W/L ratio.

It is 0.89. Just where did you pull 0.36 from?

Edited by MNML86, 17 August 2017 - 07:52 AM.

[McGoat]

I don't have any problems with the Invasion tonnages, for the most part.
Scouting on the other hand could be adjusted - drop both to 50 tons or reset both back to 55t; the advent of the BW makes the streakcrow light hunting days no where near as "OP".

[Leggin Ho]

MNML86, on 17 August 2017 - 07:51 AM, said:

Leggin Ho you need to go and check your eyes. You may need new spectacles. I was curious and checked my W/L ratio.

It is 0.89. Just where did you pull 0.36 from?

As of today, so not sure where your looking, since your making suggestions about FW, I would assume you would be using your stats from that.

[Vxheous]

MNML86, on 17 August 2017 - 07:51 AM, said:

Leggin Ho you need to go and check your eyes. You may need new spectacles. I was curious and checked my W/L ratio.

It is 0.89. Just where did you pull 0.36 from?

While 0.89 (I assume QP stats) is better than the 0.36 from faction, it's still not something you should draw attention to. Assuming you have a proper computer that can handle MWO at 60 fps, if you turn your mouse sensitivity down, it will vastly help your shooting, and in turn, it will help your W/L and K/D

Edited by Vxheous Kerensky, 20 August 2017 - 04:03 PM.