Jump to content

Gauss Should Be Armor Piercing


41 replies to this topic

#41 Brain Cancer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • 3,851 posts

Posted 30 August 2017 - 10:30 AM

Nope. Armor-piercing rounds are very specific- they're an ammo type for standard (not Ultra/Rotary/LB-X) or light AC's, and there's an SRM that also can penetrate most armor types for internal damage.

Most AP rounds from AC's do get a penalty to crits, though.

And Gauss basically fire a magnetically charged cannonball at targets. It's not even equipped with a penetrator.

#42 Insanity09

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Death Wish
  • 551 posts

Posted 30 August 2017 - 11:27 AM

If you want to go purely by the supposed definition of a gauss rifle, a hypervelocity projectile weapon, yes, it should be AP.

However, it should be so AP that it would be able to shoot straight through however many mechs you'd want standing in a line.
Even toned down, a weapon that does what hit reg problems do now would not be very balanced.

And that would be totally OP.

So, no.



(apologies on this, but it was annoying the heck out of me. AP = Armor Piercing, APC is numerous other things, including armored personnel carrier, activated protein C, etc. )





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users