Hellspawn Pre-Order Is Here!
#141
Posted 09 September 2017 - 02:34 PM
#142
Posted 09 September 2017 - 06:20 PM
#143
Posted 09 September 2017 - 09:19 PM
Hawk819, on 09 September 2017 - 06:20 PM, said:
have to correct your post: "one of the mechs I was most **** at piloting"
the Chimera is actually a pretty solid and flexible 40-tonner.
#144
Posted 10 September 2017 - 12:55 AM
Arkhangel, on 09 September 2017 - 09:19 PM, said:
The only Chimera variant that would not be total garbage is the one with the sword and TSM (and C3), i.e. the one with all the tech we don't have in MWO.
The others are simply horrible, just look at the hardpoints and their locations: 2x energy (LA), 1x missile (RT), and 1x ballistic (RA); or 2x energy (LA) and 1x missile (RT). Without a ridiculous inflation and non-canon PGI-variants sporting a different layout there is nothing to be done with this Mech that other Mechs could not do better.
And even then Assassin and Cicada would have the better geometry, for the Chimera has huge and easily destroyed STs.
The Chimera would be the worst 40 ton Mech in MWO unless PGI creates variants which have nothing to do with the source material – but then you could just chose a Mech that is not horrible out of the box to begin with.
And it is even worse in TT.
#145
Posted 10 September 2017 - 08:47 AM
#146
Posted 10 September 2017 - 12:47 PM
FLG 01, on 10 September 2017 - 12:55 AM, said:
The others are simply horrible, just look at the hardpoints and their locations: 2x energy (LA), 1x missile (RT), and 1x ballistic (RA); or 2x energy (LA) and 1x missile (RT). Without a ridiculous inflation and non-canon PGI-variants sporting a different layout there is nothing to be done with this Mech that other Mechs could not do better.
And even then Assassin and Cicada would have the better geometry, for the Chimera has huge and easily destroyed STs.
The Chimera would be the worst 40 ton Mech in MWO unless PGI creates variants which have nothing to do with the source material – but then you could just chose a Mech that is not horrible out of the box to begin with.
And it is even worse in TT.
I totally agree. They can keep the Primary, but release four others and a Hero that has nothing to do with the source version.
#147
Posted 10 September 2017 - 07:03 PM
Hawk819, on 09 September 2017 - 06:20 PM, said:
Could be worse, they could introduced the Ragnarok from MechAssault.
.
#148
Posted 10 September 2017 - 11:22 PM
el piromaniaco, on 08 September 2017 - 02:09 PM, said:
I thought the same of the Uziel then persuaded myself to get it... it turned out to be even worse than the artwork.
Don't make my mistake!
#149
Posted 11 September 2017 - 12:26 PM
It does not look cool.
It can't do anything other mechs could do better.
It is neither a Battletech classicclassic nor extremely popular in any other MW title.
Beats me why you would bring that thing.
#151
Posted 16 September 2017 - 01:44 AM
Juodas Varnas, on 01 September 2017 - 09:35 AM, said:
.
.
.
Looks kind of like a tractor.
Dude, give it up! Mich over at BATTLETECH is even considering crowd-funding a device that can strangle people over the internet because of you and your "quads"
Arkhangel, on 09 September 2017 - 09:19 PM, said:
the Chimera is actually a pretty solid and flexible 40-tonner.
Flexible < Boat in MWO.
6 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users