data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3ae9/b3ae9cf8cfed3e06df6984fcf2a08c460eab065d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8b54/d8b54e7a47cf52481bc45d3566c7b0ade78ceb21" alt=""
Shafted Again - Over $250 Spent But Still Don't Qualify For The Clan Or Is Top Tier Reward
#1
Posted 14 September 2017 - 02:08 PM
Seriously, this is some BS yet again this year. Why does it not surprise me that PGI would pull the same crap even when there were a hundred posts complaining about this last year.
This honestly just makes me want to flip PGI the bird rather than spend more money. Good Job PGI marketing team, you succeeded in making one of your top spenders, look for other places to spend his money.
#2
Posted 14 September 2017 - 02:09 PM
#3
Posted 14 September 2017 - 02:20 PM
Also, ty to PGI for a missle urbie. That part was done right.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce741/ce741b1be519f0138c70cb79d5ab1d36931990bf" alt=":)"
#4
Posted 14 September 2017 - 02:21 PM
Lorian Sunrider, on 14 September 2017 - 02:09 PM, said:
That is just the thing. I personally think it is a waste to buy the collectors pack because I already own 44 mechs with 30% C-bill bonus and have damn near a year of premium time and that is all you get with the Collectors pack. What I would rather do is buy the Hero ($15) and/or pick up next months mech pack instead yet I am penalized because I spend my money that way instead of buying collectors packs. This is totally BS to me.
#5
Posted 14 September 2017 - 02:27 PM
Sorry for the folks who feel they're getting shafted.
#7
Posted 14 September 2017 - 02:34 PM
Jay Leon Hart, on 14 September 2017 - 02:30 PM, said:
Sorry but penalized it the correct word. I am being told I didn't spend my money in the correct way despite spending 3-4 times over the amount that would qualify me if I had spent my money on collectors packs. Sorry but that is a penalty in my estimation. Oh and yeah, I am not getting rewarded either.
#8
Posted 14 September 2017 - 02:39 PM
So if you feel like you're being shafted, realize you aren't - You just happen to be the target audience of the Hostage Program. Spend, baby, spend.
Edited by Bombast, 14 September 2017 - 05:51 PM.
#9
Posted 14 September 2017 - 03:02 PM
I swear, people on this forum are such entitled whiners.
#10
Posted 14 September 2017 - 03:08 PM
Bombast, on 14 September 2017 - 02:39 PM, said:
So if you feel like you're being shafted, realize you aren't - You just happen to be the target audience of the Hostage Program. Spend, baby, spend.
Have already spent, bay, spent. That is the issue. Don't have a problem one with the program rewarding you for spending money, I just have a problem with the fact that the way I spent my money apparently isn't good enough to get rewarded for. That is where the shafting comes in.
PGI "Hi Viktor, thank you for spending near $300 this year on our game but you have been naughty and didn't buy collectors packs, shame on you, guess your just getting the lump of coal." Then....'Oh by the way, we have this lovely Hellspawn mech pack for you to spend even more money on but your still only getting the lump of coal next year if you don't fork over for a Collectors pack or 3".
#11
Posted 14 September 2017 - 03:10 PM
Anyone?
#12
Posted 14 September 2017 - 03:31 PM
For myself I got exactly what I thought I'd get. I figured I'd get the IS top tier because I bought the Nightstar and Osiris collector packs, and I wouldn't get the Clan top tier because I haven't bought any clan collector packs. I can upgrade my Arctic Wolf standard pack to collector for $20 and buy the Cougar collector pack ($30) or Marauder IIC collector pack ($32 from sept 26 to oct 4) to qualify for the clan top tier and ultimate rewards but I'll make that decision later.
Edited by Ruccus, 14 September 2017 - 03:37 PM.
#13
Posted 14 September 2017 - 03:35 PM
#14
Posted 14 September 2017 - 03:43 PM
Viktor Drake, on 14 September 2017 - 02:21 PM, said:
Try to look at it this way:
Part of the added value of the collector level (besides premium time and c-bill bonus) is that it qualifies you for the annual top tier loyalty awards.
#15
Posted 14 September 2017 - 03:51 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 14 September 2017 - 03:10 PM, said:
Anyone?
I recall them saying they would "look into it" or words to that effect, but I don't remember them saying it would definitely change.
#16
Posted 14 September 2017 - 04:21 PM
Viktor Drake, on 14 September 2017 - 03:08 PM, said:
Have already spent, bay, spent. That is the issue. Don't have a problem one with the program rewarding you for spending money, I just have a problem with the fact that the way I spent my money apparently isn't good enough to get rewarded for. That is where the shafting comes in.
...
This is just silly.
I spent more money than that on contests rewards and oh me, oh my, not one penny of that goes toward my "loyalty" rewards. I feel so snubbed. Insulted even! Actually, no. Not even a tiny bit.
See, my spending gets other people their loyalty rewards, but that isn't some nasty ploy on PGI's part to make me feel ripped off, or whatever. It isn't a snub, rather, that is how it works. Just as if I want a loyalty reward, I need to buy what PGI says I should buy. It's their game, it's their program. It's that simple. Moreover the precedent from last year ought to have been a loud and clear message to you as to what needed to be done in order to qualify this year.
Edit. Also, stop making me defend PGI. It's making me very uncomfortable damn it.
Edited by Bud Crue, 14 September 2017 - 04:22 PM.
#17
Posted 14 September 2017 - 04:23 PM
Apparently I'm not loyal.
#18
Posted 14 September 2017 - 04:28 PM
#19
Posted 14 September 2017 - 04:39 PM
Jay Leon Hart, on 14 September 2017 - 03:51 PM, said:
I recall them saying they would "look into it" or words to that effect, but I don't remember them saying it would definitely change.
Hey dad... can I have ice cream for breakfast.... I'll consider it son... NO.
*shrugs* If they never said they would change it, then people expecting them to only have themselves to blame thinking that they would.
#20
Posted 14 September 2017 - 05:38 PM
That said, before PGI went all wobbly with their decision making in the 2nd half of this year (I'm sure some would say that happened much longer ago
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d785d/d785dbc9efb07ab589158523f83145489b51453e" alt="Posted Image"
Edited by SFC174, 14 September 2017 - 05:38 PM.
5 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users