#61
Posted 05 October 2017 - 06:10 PM
#62
Posted 05 October 2017 - 06:18 PM
Asrrin, on 05 October 2017 - 06:07 PM, said:
For the record, If you haven't been in a top tier of a tournament (Div A/B MRBC, finalists in RHOD or Star League, or top 12 in WC '16/'17) I don't consider you tier 1...
There is quite a few players out there that haven't made the holy grail of
#63
Posted 05 October 2017 - 06:21 PM
Asrrin, on 05 October 2017 - 06:07 PM, said:
For the record, If you haven't been in a top tier of a tournament (Div A/B MRBC, finalists in RHOD or Star League, or top 12 in WC '16/'17) I don't consider you tier 1...
Just to clarify, div been mrbc winner or just in a team in div b?
Also any specific area?
#64
Posted 05 October 2017 - 06:46 PM
justcallme A S H, on 05 October 2017 - 06:18 PM, said:
There is quite a few players out there that haven't made the holy grail of
Which is why I gave several examples of diverse tournaments with vastly different metas. I pity anyone that thinks that cERPPCs are the only meta weapon.
Bohxim, on 05 October 2017 - 06:21 PM, said:
Also any specific area?
I gave a general list of examples. If you are not regularly playing with or against people of this caliber and holding your own then I don't think you make the cut.
If you happen to be one of a few dozen alternates on the list of the last place Div B team, I highly doubt you are Tier 1 material, but if you are carrying the team on your back in Div C, maybe you've got what it takes. It's kind of subjective at that level.
#65
Posted 05 October 2017 - 06:57 PM
I'm still bummed PGI took the clamp off of the matchmaker again. For a nice while players would only ever be matched with people one tier higher or lower than them. As of my typing this, tier 5's are dropping with Tier 1's again. It sucks because for that short span of time the matches during NA late evening hours were pretty fun.
Edited by FireStoat, 06 October 2017 - 07:58 AM.
#66
Posted 05 October 2017 - 06:59 PM
5570 Gaden Phoenix 1820 1665 1.09 2777 2340 1.19 3489 260 262 14% 4% 19% 64% 12%
I DEMAND TO BE De-TIERed to T5!!! Or at least T3.
Edited by Gaden Phoenix, 05 October 2017 - 07:20 PM.
#67
Posted 05 October 2017 - 07:15 PM
Kroete, on 05 October 2017 - 05:44 PM, said:
Please stop your elitism, depending on your stats you are one of these "potatos" you are talking about, if you cant catch up with an old, drugged and disabled man, whos using lrms in tier 1, finds metawhoring boring (and dont uses it) and only plays for fun and not competition.
Elitism?
I don't even belong in Tier 1.
I have a tier 1 clan account and a tier 1 I.S. account, and yet I am not a tier 1 pilot.
Most days I belong somewhere in the middle to lower part of Tier 2.
If you looked at my stats, you might even suggest tier 3
I am certainly not potato(most of the time )
#68
Posted 05 October 2017 - 07:16 PM
Now I just play to play instead of trying to impress the forum warriors.
For example, my great pleasure right now is the TBT-7M and all my Uziels. Whist I don't kill a lot in them I consistently score high(ish) damage...and more importantly I have a lot of fun.
#69
Posted 05 October 2017 - 07:22 PM
#70
Posted 05 October 2017 - 07:23 PM
Gaden Phoenix, on 05 October 2017 - 07:22 PM, said:
That's not the List's fault - people did the same thing with PGI's native leaderboard. The List just has a superior presentation and a way to rank a player's overall stats, instead of just individual stats (Which I don't think anyone's used here, except for me, and it was as a positive).
#71
Posted 05 October 2017 - 07:43 PM
Stf Sgt Marblez, on 05 October 2017 - 02:03 PM, said:
Also learned a bit about a mechwarrior I was curious about. Gettin that itch scratched felt sooooooo gud.
what is this Jarl's list and why should phukks be given?
#72
Posted 05 October 2017 - 07:47 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 05 October 2017 - 07:43 PM, said:
http://leaderboard.isengrim.org
It's just another an attempt to do the leaderboard better than PGI does.
#73
Posted 05 October 2017 - 07:49 PM
Bombast, on 05 October 2017 - 07:47 PM, said:
http://leaderboard.isengrim.org
It's just another an attempt to do the leaderboard better than PGI does.
you mean it's yet another pointless epeen chart? Cool. Just one more reason why no phukks are given anymore.
#74
Posted 05 October 2017 - 08:06 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 05 October 2017 - 07:49 PM, said:
Hit the nail on the head.
I log into this game day in and day out bc big stompy robots, high caliber ballistics, and an outrageous amount of any type of missle. It was just nice to see I'm not the most russet potato out there.
But yeah, you pretty much got it right.
o7
#75
Posted 05 October 2017 - 08:09 PM
#76
Posted 05 October 2017 - 08:15 PM
Gaden Phoenix, on 05 October 2017 - 07:22 PM, said:
TBH there are maybe ~50 active posters on these forums that actually play at a decent level and understand MWO, balance and the game as a whole. Doesn't take a genius to work out who they are either.
The rest are just throwing elephant dung like it's playtime at the zoo (IE; quite a lot of CJF Loyalists, for example)
Edited by justcallme A S H, 05 October 2017 - 08:16 PM.
#77
Posted 05 October 2017 - 08:17 PM
Bohxim, on 05 October 2017 - 06:21 PM, said:
Also any specific area?
MWO WC have show the Skill gap Between EU/AP and NA is very low(EMP is the exception to the rule), Its just NA teams can have a range of scrims and heaps more chances to work on there team play.
T1 in MWO means nothing, as the environment that you gain EXP is casual and no way competitive.
#78
Posted 05 October 2017 - 08:19 PM
Asrrin, on 05 October 2017 - 06:46 PM, said:
Which is why I gave several examples of diverse tournaments with vastly different metas. I pity anyone that thinks that cERPPCs are the only meta weapon.
I gave a general list of examples. If you are not regularly playing with or against people of this caliber and holding your own then I don't think you make the cut.
:rolleyes.gif:
Why does no-one outside of AU understand our funnies?
#79
Posted 05 October 2017 - 08:23 PM
5 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users