Battle Of Luthien Results
#21
Posted 17 October 2017 - 01:47 PM
-PGI
#22
Posted 17 October 2017 - 01:56 PM
#23
Posted 17 October 2017 - 02:03 PM
Mcgral18, on 17 October 2017 - 01:39 PM, said:
Yeah, that's a pretty solid reason why CW was so bad at the start
Nothing mattered until the end. The extra time zones helped a little...but when nothing matters aside from the last 2 hours, what's the point?
If you're only focusing on the win conditions, there is no point.
But from a game design standpoint, the purpose is to keep one side from developing a lead the other cannot hope to overcome and discourage anyone on the other side from playing, especially if there's a major population imbalance, which it sounds like there was given how long Clanners reported having to wait for Invasion matches.
It's not an ideal solution, but given the situation PGI is in with this small a player base, it makes sense they chose to do it like this.
#24
Posted 17 October 2017 - 02:04 PM
#25
Posted 17 October 2017 - 02:04 PM
I don't think PGI will let the Clans win this invasion, so expect more patches along the way.
#26
Posted 17 October 2017 - 02:11 PM
Now, since this was the Battle of Luthien, with the Clans attacking and the IS defending, and Luthien is still in IS hands, I think it is clear that the defenders have won. They should get a Mauler.
#27
Posted 17 October 2017 - 02:13 PM
Is this a f-ing joke?
Our unit will remember this for the next event. Don't even bother playing until the very end, because that's all PGI will base the win conditions on anyways. If that means we ultimately play the game way less during the next event, and do something else with our lives, well apparently that's exactly what PGI wants.
#28
Posted 17 October 2017 - 02:13 PM
This event made me remember how much fun Scouting is compared to Invasion. I completed the event on Sunday (or Saturday night, maybe?) without ever dropping in Invasion. And for the first time in a while, I had a good time in FP.
Here's hoping that more FP events can be completed through Scouting.
-paws
#29
Posted 17 October 2017 - 02:14 PM
#30
Posted 17 October 2017 - 02:19 PM
Hey PGI, the way you've structured these multi-day faction play events means its very easy for one side to prevent a win with the bare minimum of organization. One possible alternative is to make it cumulative. So if Clan wins one attack phase they get 1 point. If IS wins one, they get 1 point. Whoever collects the most points at the end wins. If you wanted to prevent people from just giving up after you reach a tipping point, you could make attack phase wins worth more as you progress.
#31
Posted 17 October 2017 - 02:26 PM
Edited by ShooteyMcShooterson, 17 October 2017 - 02:29 PM.
#32
Posted 17 October 2017 - 02:37 PM
#33
Posted 17 October 2017 - 02:42 PM
Why didn't we do this like Tukayyid and determine victory by which side the bar is on?
Failure to capture by Clans is a win for the IS because the planet remains in Inner Sphere possession and it can't be attacked a second time. Therefore, if this repeats itself 3 more times, Clans "lose" the season, not a stalemate, a loss.
"No clear victor" my ***!
Clans were within capture threshold within 6 hours of the competition beginning! And yet we "lose" in the final hour-how, dare I wonder? And as I said before, the Clan capture threshold had to be above 95% progress bar to win, but IS win threshold was everything outside that box. The event lacked balance and fairness from the very beginning.
#34
Posted 17 October 2017 - 02:43 PM
1. Give IS the win, because they pushed the bar back at the very end, or
2. Admit that the "win" condition imposed by PGI is dumb because it literally incentivizes just playing at the very end of the event as it has been stated by many people and give Clans the win.
Saying it is a tie when it obviously wasn't based on either of the above logics for win conditions is ridiculous.
Tele
PS: Also, what is up with the lack of actual DOUBLE REWARDs for tournament supporters? Is that no longer/never was a thing?
Edited by Telemachus -Salt Wife Salt Life-, 17 October 2017 - 02:46 PM.
#35
Posted 17 October 2017 - 02:44 PM
#36
Posted 17 October 2017 - 02:45 PM
LazerTag, on 17 October 2017 - 01:30 PM, said:
Exactly! So that's what PGI meant when they announced the new faction play victory conditions. As I can remember, they said Clans have to capture three IS capital cities or IS has to capture two (?) Clan home world capital cities. If an invasion failes the capital city can 'never' be attacked again. If one side ultimatively fails to get their minimum victory aims the other side wins.
So, correct me if I'm wrong, PGI, if the Clans succeed in rushing through the Inner Sphere but fail in capturing at least three capital cities of the IS, the Inner Sphere will win this FP season?
That would be great! (but could result in a no-one-moves scenario if the Clans could lose their final battle)
Andrzej Lechrenski, on 17 October 2017 - 02:44 PM, said:
And thats the major drawback of the new event system. You could, theoretically, win 90% of the time but if the other side wins their 10% at the right time you fail to win the event. That would be a weak game system.
Edited by Simulacrum, 17 October 2017 - 02:49 PM.
#37
Posted 17 October 2017 - 02:46 PM
Aldebrando, on 17 October 2017 - 02:09 PM, said:
A tie is stupid in so many levels it just seems to me that PGI didnt wanted any side to get the reward mech.
If you are trying to bring real life siege mechanics, then you are probably right, and breaking a siege would have resulted in a victory. Provided one essential conditon: you must have some planet to breakthrough to. Luthien was surrounded for weeks, there were no escape routes. And taking the beating in the last past days, IS were exhausted enough to have any resources for even that fighting back to happen. Actually, all Luthien defenders would have been dead long before this breakthrough. Siege IRL
#38
Posted 17 October 2017 - 02:47 PM
#39
Posted 17 October 2017 - 02:49 PM
Edited by Telemachus -Salt Wife Salt Life-, 17 October 2017 - 02:49 PM.
#40
Posted 17 October 2017 - 02:59 PM
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users