Jump to content

Battle Of Luthien Statistics


98 replies to this topic

#81 LordFatman

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • The Moon
  • The Moon
  • 183 posts

Posted 25 October 2017 - 09:07 AM

Total # of Scout Matches
13073
Total # of Scout Match wins
Clan: 6050
IS: 7023
Total # of Siege Matches
1623
Total # of Siege Match attacker/defender wins
Clan: 988
IS: 635



only thing IS won was scouting and I didn't think they counted towards faction win count

Edited by LordFatman, 25 October 2017 - 09:07 AM.


#82 Tina Benoit

    Community Manager

  • Developer
  • Developer
  • 817 posts

Posted 25 October 2017 - 03:58 PM

Hello, thanks everyone for the feedback.

We've updated the post with a few more stats as requested. They can also be reviewed here below:


Total Won Matches per Game Mode:

Inner Sphere
Assault: 54
Conquest: 58
Skirmish: 48
Invasion: 635
Domination: 28
Scouting: 7023
Incursion: 56

Clans
Assault : 85
Conquest: 91
Skirmish: 87
Invasion: 988
Domination: 78
Scouting: 6050
Incursion: 80


Top 20 Mechs used per Game Mode:

Inner Sphere Assault top Mechs and # of matches:
MARAUDER MAD-3R: 168
ASSASSIN ASN-21: 165
WARHAMMER WHM-6R: 164
WARHAMMER WHM-6D: 158
BLACK WIDOW: 142
BATTLEMASTER BLR-1G: 141
MAULER MAL-MX90: 119
JAGERMECH JM6-DD: 107
CYCLOPS CP-10-Q: 84
GRIFFIN GRF-2N : 76
GRASSHOPPER GHR-5P: 73
BATTLEMASTER BLR-2C: 72
PHOENIX HAWK PXH-2(C): 69
CATAPULT CPLT-K2: 68
RIFLEMAN RFL-3C: 67
JAGERMECH JM6-S: 66
SLEIPNIR: 61
PIRATES' BANE: 59
TEMPEST: 57
CICADA CDA-3M: 57

Inner Sphere Conquest top Mech and # of matches:
WARHAMMER WHM-6R: 185
ASSASSIN ASN-21: 176
BATTLEMASTER BLR-1G: 152
MARAUDER MAD-3R: 145
WARHAMMER WHM-6D: 144
MAULER MAL-MX90: 124
BLACK WIDOW: 111
CYCLOPS CP-10-Q: 108
JAGERMECH JM6-DD: 97
BATTLEMASTER BLR-2C: 90
THUNDERBOLT TDR-5SS: 85
CICADA CDA-3M: 85
PIRATES' BANE: 84
CATAPULT CPLT-K2: 77
GRIFFIN GRF-2N: 75
GRASSHOPPER GHR-5P: 72
MARAUDER MAD-5M: 71
PHOENIX HAWK PXH-2(C): 66
SLEIPNIR: 66
BOUNTY HUNTER II: 64

Inner Sphere Skirmish top Mechs and # matches:
MARAUDER MAD-3R: 180
WARHAMMER WHM-6D: 159
WARHAMMER WHM-6R: 149
BATTLEMASTER BLR-1G: 137
ASSASSIN ASN-21: 132
MAULER MAL-MX90: 118
BLACK WIDOW: 109
JAGERMECH JM6-DD: 98
GRASSHOPPER GHR-5P: 84
BATTLEMASTER BLR-2C: 75
PIRATES' BANE: 72
|GRASSHOPPER GHR-5H: 71
GRIFFIN GRF-2N: 67
RIFLEMAN RFL-3C: 65
JAGERMECH JM6-S: 63
CATAPULT CPLT-K2: 63
CICADA CDA-3M: 58
|ROUGHNECK RGH-3A: 58
WARHAMMER WHM-6D(C): 56
MARAUDER MAD-5M: 56

Inner Sphere Invasion top Mechs and # matches:
WARHAMMER WHM-6R: 2033
MARAUDER MAD-3R: 1932
ASSASSIN ASN-21: 1782
WARHAMMER WHM-6D: 1759
BATTLEMASTER BLR-1G: 1506
MAULER MAL-MX90: 1300
JAGERMECH JM6-DD: 1159
BLACK WIDOW: 1154
CYCLOPS CP-10-Q: 1100
CATAPULT CPLT-K2: 876
BATTLEMASTER BLR-2C: 787
GRASSHOPPER GHR-5H: 775
JAGERMECH JM6-S: 770
THUNDERBOLT TDR-5SS: 759
MARAUDER MAD-5M: 747
PIRATES' BANE: 747
GRASSHOPPER GHR-5P: 738
GRIFFIN GRF-2N: 735
MARAUDER MAD-5D: 687
BOUNTY HUNTER II: 660

Inner Sphere Domination top Mechs and # matches:
WARHAMMER WHM-6R: 147
MARAUDER MAD-3R: 125
BATTLEMASTER BLR-1G: 112
ASSASSIN ASN-21: 108
WARHAMMER WHM-6D: 104
JAGERMECH JM6-DD: 82
BLACK WIDOW: 75
MAULER MAL-MX90: 70
PIRATES' BANE: 65
CYCLOPS CP-10-Q: 62
JAGERMECH JM6-S: 59
CATAPULT CPLT-K2: 55
BATTLEMASTER BLR-2C: 54
STALKER STK-3F(C): 53
GRIFFIN GRF-2N: 53
CATAPULT CPLT-C4: 52
MARAUDER MAD-5D: 51
RAVEN RVN-3L: 51
MARAUDER MAD-5M: 51
ROUGHNECK RGH-3A: 47

Inner Sphere Scouting top Mechs and # matches:
GRIFFIN GRF-2N: 4610
BUSHWACKER BSW-P1: 3718
BUSHWACKER BSW-X1: 3302
ASSASSIN ASN-21: 2909
CENTURION CN9-AH(L): 1934
SHADOW HAWK SHD-2D2: 1740
CENTURION CN9-A(NCIX): 1365
BUSHWACKER BSW-P2: 1359
BUSHWACKER BSW-S2: 1207
HUNCHBACK HBK-4SP: 1091
HIGH ROLLER: 1076
|HUNCHBACK HBK-4G: 840
KINTARO KTO-18: 824
CRAB CRB-27B: 808
HUNCHBACK HBK-4P: 787
SHADOW HAWK SHD-2H: 770
PHOENIX HAWK PXH-2(C): 763
GRIFFIN GRF-3M: 718

Inner Sphere Incursion top Mechs and # matches:
WARHAMMER WHM-6R: 182
ASSASSIN ASN-21: 169
MARAUDER MAD-3R: 156
BATTLEMASTER BLR-1G: 149
WARHAMMER WHM-6D: 142
BLACK WIDOW: 104
JAGERMECH JM6-DD: 97
MAULER MAL-MX90: 96
CYCLOPS CP-10-Q: 90
SLEIPNIR: 81
CATAPULT CPLT-K2: 78
GRASSHOPPER GHR-5H: 72
GRASSHOPPER GHR-5P: 70
GRIFFIN GRF-2N: 67
MARAUDER MAD-5M: 67
PIRATES' BANE: 65
BATTLEMASTER BLR-2C: 64
JAGERMECH JM6-S: 62
WARHAMMER WHM-6D(C): 59
PHOENIX HAWK PXH-2(C): 57


Clans Assault top Mechs and # matches:
HELLBRINGER HBR-PRIME: 232
HELLBRINGER HBR-F(L): 197
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-A: 178
HELLBRINGER HBR-A: 163
MIST LYNX MLX-G: 161
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-PRIME: 144
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-B: 142
LINEBACKER LBK-PRIME: 140
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC-A: 133
MAD DOG MDD-PRIME: 110
MAD DOG MDD-A: 97
MARAUDER IIC MAD-IIC-D: 92
| ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-E: 89
TIMBER WOLF TBR-PRIME: 86
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME: 85
HELLBRINGER HBR-B: 80
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC: 80
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-C: 76
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-C: 75
TIMBER WOLF TBR-C: 75

Clans Conquest top Mechs and # matches:
HELLBRINGER HBR-PRIME: 238
LINEBACKER LBK-PRIME: 218
MIST LYNX MLX-G: 191
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-A: 175
HELLBRINGER HBR-F(L): 162
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC-A: 148
MAD DOG MDD-PRIME: 137
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-PRIME: 128
HELLBRINGER HBR-A: 123
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-B: 120
LINEBACKER LBK-C: 112
LINEBACKER LBK-D: 111
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME: 110
MAD DOG MDD-A: 100
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-E: 99
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME(C): 92
MARAUDER IIC MAD-IIC: 91
MARAUDER IIC MAD-IIC-D: 83
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-C: 83
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-PRIME(I):81

Clans Skirmish top Mechs and # matches:
HELLBRINGER HBR-PRIME: 262
| HELLBRINGER HBR-F(L): 185
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-A: 178
MIST LYNX MLX-G: 164
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC-A: 144
HELLBRINGER HBR-A: 143
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-B: 139
MAD DOG MDD-PRIME: 117
LINEBACKER LBK-PRIME: 113
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-PRIME: 109
MAD DOG MDD-A: 106
HELLBRINGER HBR-B: 98
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME: 87
MARAUDER IIC MAD-IIC-D: 86
TIMBER WOLF TBR-PRIME: 84
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-E: 83
SHADOW CAT SHC-B: 81
HELLBRINGER HBR-F(C): 80
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME(C): 80
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-C: 79

Clans Invasion top mechs and # of matches:
HELLBRINGER HBR-PRIME: 2546
MIST LYNX MLX-G: 2306
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-A: 1923
HELLBRINGER HBR-F(L): 1893
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC-A: 1686
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-B: 1673
LINEBACKER LBK-PRIME: 1655
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-PRIME: 1568
HELLBRINGER HBR-A: 1454
MAD DOG MDD-A: 1300
MAD DOG MDD-PRIME: 1272
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME: 1057
MARAUDER IIC MAD-IIC: 1021
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME(C): 920
MARAUDER IIC MAD-IIC-D: 909
HELLBRINGER HBR-B: 905
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-E: 904
SHADOW CAT SHC-B: 900
HELLBRINGER HBR-F(C): 870
ORION IIC ON1-IIC-A: 851

Clan Domination top Mechs and # of matches:
HELLBRINGER HBR-PRIME: 190
MIST LYNX MLX-G: 171
HELLBRINGER HBR-F(L): 146
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-A: 122
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC-A: 118
LINEBACKER LBK-PRIME: 109
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-B: 92
MAD DOG MDD-PRIME: 91
HELLBRINGER HBR-A: 89
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-PRIME: 84
MARAUDER IIC MAD-IIC: 79
MAD DOG MDD-A: 70
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-C: 67
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME: 64
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC: 62
TIMBER WOLF TBR-PRIME: 62
MARAUDER IIC MAD-IIC-D: 62
SHADOW CAT SHC-B: 62
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-E: 61
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME(C): 60

Clan Scouting top Mechs and # of matches:
HUNTSMAN HMN-P: 4485
NOVA NVA-PRIME: 4246
PAKHET: 4009
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC-B: 3918
NOVA NVA-S: 3339
HUNTSMAN HMN-PRIME: 2931
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC-A: 2771
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC: 2068
HUNTSMAN HMN-B: 1372
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC-C: 1237
HUNTSMAN HMN-C: 1164
SHADOW CAT SHC-B: 1143
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC(C): 1115
SHADOW CAT SHC-P: 1032
VIPER VPR-C: 967
BREAKER: 944
NOVA NVA-PRIME(I): 936
MIST LYNX MLX-G: 921
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-PRIME: 787
NOVA NVA-S(C): 763

Clans Incursion top Mechs and # of matches:
HELLBRINGER HBR-PRIME: 216
LINEBACKER LBK-PRIME: 177
HELLBRINGER HBR-F(L): 170
MIST LYNX MLX-G: 158
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-A: 152
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC-A: 134
HELLBRINGER HBR-A: 127
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-PRIME: 116
MAD DOG MDD-PRIME: 114
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-B: 113
LINEBACKER LBK-D: 112
LINEBACKER LBK-C: 99
HELLBRINGER HBR-B: 94
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME: 92
MAD DOG MDD-A: 87
SHADOW CAT SHC-B: 83
MARAUDER IIC MAD-IIC-D: 79
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-E: 78
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME(C): 74
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC(C) : 73


Number of players who have participated in at least 1 match during the event:
Davion: 733
Kurita: 995
Liao: 897
Marik: 903
Rasalhague: 585
Steiner: 677
Clan Smoke Jaguar: 914
Clan Jade Falcon: 521
Clan Wolf: 688
Clan Ghost Bear: 608
Clan Nova Cat: 799
Clan Steel Viper: 572
Clan Diamond Shark: 656
None: 89

#83 Tarl Cabot

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Tai-sho
  • Tai-sho
  • 7,763 posts
  • LocationImperial City, Luthien - Draconis Combine

Posted 25 October 2017 - 04:32 PM

View PostTina Benoit, on 25 October 2017 - 03:58 PM, said:

Hello, thanks everyone for the feedback.

We've updated the post with a few more stats as requested. They can also be reviewed here below:


Total Won Matches per Game Mode:

Inner Sphere
Assault: 54
Conquest: 58
Skirmish: 48
Invasion: 635
Domination: 28
Scouting: 7023
Incursion: 56

Clans
Assault : 85
Conquest: 91
Skirmish: 87
Invasion: 988
Domination: 78
Scouting: 6050
Incursion: 80


Top 20 Mechs used per Game Mode:

Inner Sphere Assault top Mechs and # of matches:
MARAUDER MAD-3R: 168
ASSASSIN ASN-21: 165
WARHAMMER WHM-6R: 164
WARHAMMER WHM-6D: 158
BLACK WIDOW: 142
BATTLEMASTER BLR-1G: 141
MAULER MAL-MX90: 119
JAGERMECH JM6-DD: 107
CYCLOPS CP-10-Q: 84
GRIFFIN GRF-2N : 76
GRASSHOPPER GHR-5P: 73
BATTLEMASTER BLR-2C: 72
PHOENIX HAWK PXH-2(C): 69
CATAPULT CPLT-K2: 68
RIFLEMAN RFL-3C: 67
JAGERMECH JM6-S: 66
SLEIPNIR: 61
PIRATES' BANE: 59
TEMPEST: 57
CICADA CDA-3M: 57

Inner Sphere Conquest top Mech and # of matches:
WARHAMMER WHM-6R: 185
ASSASSIN ASN-21: 176
BATTLEMASTER BLR-1G: 152
MARAUDER MAD-3R: 145
WARHAMMER WHM-6D: 144
MAULER MAL-MX90: 124
BLACK WIDOW: 111
CYCLOPS CP-10-Q: 108
JAGERMECH JM6-DD: 97
BATTLEMASTER BLR-2C: 90
THUNDERBOLT TDR-5SS: 85
CICADA CDA-3M: 85
PIRATES' BANE: 84
CATAPULT CPLT-K2: 77
GRIFFIN GRF-2N: 75
GRASSHOPPER GHR-5P: 72
MARAUDER MAD-5M: 71
PHOENIX HAWK PXH-2(C): 66
SLEIPNIR: 66
BOUNTY HUNTER II: 64

Inner Sphere Skirmish top Mechs and # matches:
MARAUDER MAD-3R: 180
WARHAMMER WHM-6D: 159
WARHAMMER WHM-6R: 149
BATTLEMASTER BLR-1G: 137
ASSASSIN ASN-21: 132
MAULER MAL-MX90: 118
BLACK WIDOW: 109
JAGERMECH JM6-DD: 98
GRASSHOPPER GHR-5P: 84
BATTLEMASTER BLR-2C: 75
PIRATES' BANE: 72
|GRASSHOPPER GHR-5H: 71
GRIFFIN GRF-2N: 67
RIFLEMAN RFL-3C: 65
JAGERMECH JM6-S: 63
CATAPULT CPLT-K2: 63
CICADA CDA-3M: 58
|ROUGHNECK RGH-3A: 58
WARHAMMER WHM-6D(C): 56
MARAUDER MAD-5M: 56

Inner Sphere Invasion top Mechs and # matches:
WARHAMMER WHM-6R: 2033
MARAUDER MAD-3R: 1932
ASSASSIN ASN-21: 1782
WARHAMMER WHM-6D: 1759
BATTLEMASTER BLR-1G: 1506
MAULER MAL-MX90: 1300
JAGERMECH JM6-DD: 1159
BLACK WIDOW: 1154
CYCLOPS CP-10-Q: 1100
CATAPULT CPLT-K2: 876
BATTLEMASTER BLR-2C: 787
GRASSHOPPER GHR-5H: 775
JAGERMECH JM6-S: 770
THUNDERBOLT TDR-5SS: 759
MARAUDER MAD-5M: 747
PIRATES' BANE: 747
GRASSHOPPER GHR-5P: 738
GRIFFIN GRF-2N: 735
MARAUDER MAD-5D: 687
BOUNTY HUNTER II: 660

Inner Sphere Domination top Mechs and # matches:
WARHAMMER WHM-6R: 147
MARAUDER MAD-3R: 125
BATTLEMASTER BLR-1G: 112
ASSASSIN ASN-21: 108
WARHAMMER WHM-6D: 104
JAGERMECH JM6-DD: 82
BLACK WIDOW: 75
MAULER MAL-MX90: 70
PIRATES' BANE: 65
CYCLOPS CP-10-Q: 62
JAGERMECH JM6-S: 59
CATAPULT CPLT-K2: 55
BATTLEMASTER BLR-2C: 54
STALKER STK-3F(C): 53
GRIFFIN GRF-2N: 53
CATAPULT CPLT-C4: 52
MARAUDER MAD-5D: 51
RAVEN RVN-3L: 51
MARAUDER MAD-5M: 51
ROUGHNECK RGH-3A: 47

Inner Sphere Scouting top Mechs and # matches:
GRIFFIN GRF-2N: 4610
BUSHWACKER BSW-P1: 3718
BUSHWACKER BSW-X1: 3302
ASSASSIN ASN-21: 2909
CENTURION CN9-AH(L): 1934
SHADOW HAWK SHD-2D2: 1740
CENTURION CN9-A(NCIX): 1365
BUSHWACKER BSW-P2: 1359
BUSHWACKER BSW-S2: 1207
HUNCHBACK HBK-4SP: 1091
HIGH ROLLER: 1076
|HUNCHBACK HBK-4G: 840
KINTARO KTO-18: 824
CRAB CRB-27B: 808
HUNCHBACK HBK-4P: 787
SHADOW HAWK SHD-2H: 770
PHOENIX HAWK PXH-2(C): 763
GRIFFIN GRF-3M: 718

Inner Sphere Incursion top Mechs and # matches:
WARHAMMER WHM-6R: 182
ASSASSIN ASN-21: 169
MARAUDER MAD-3R: 156
BATTLEMASTER BLR-1G: 149
WARHAMMER WHM-6D: 142
BLACK WIDOW: 104
JAGERMECH JM6-DD: 97
MAULER MAL-MX90: 96
CYCLOPS CP-10-Q: 90
SLEIPNIR: 81
CATAPULT CPLT-K2: 78
GRASSHOPPER GHR-5H: 72
GRASSHOPPER GHR-5P: 70
GRIFFIN GRF-2N: 67
MARAUDER MAD-5M: 67
PIRATES' BANE: 65
BATTLEMASTER BLR-2C: 64
JAGERMECH JM6-S: 62
WARHAMMER WHM-6D(C): 59
PHOENIX HAWK PXH-2(C): 57


Clans Assault top Mechs and # matches:
HELLBRINGER HBR-PRIME: 232
HELLBRINGER HBR-F(L): 197
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-A: 178
HELLBRINGER HBR-A: 163
MIST LYNX MLX-G: 161
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-PRIME: 144
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-B: 142
LINEBACKER LBK-PRIME: 140
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC-A: 133
MAD DOG MDD-PRIME: 110
MAD DOG MDD-A: 97
MARAUDER IIC MAD-IIC-D: 92
| ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-E: 89
TIMBER WOLF TBR-PRIME: 86
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME: 85
HELLBRINGER HBR-B: 80
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC: 80
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-C: 76
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-C: 75
TIMBER WOLF TBR-C: 75

Clans Conquest top Mechs and # matches:
HELLBRINGER HBR-PRIME: 238
LINEBACKER LBK-PRIME: 218
MIST LYNX MLX-G: 191
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-A: 175
HELLBRINGER HBR-F(L): 162
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC-A: 148
MAD DOG MDD-PRIME: 137
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-PRIME: 128
HELLBRINGER HBR-A: 123
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-B: 120
LINEBACKER LBK-C: 112
LINEBACKER LBK-D: 111
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME: 110
MAD DOG MDD-A: 100
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-E: 99
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME(C): 92
MARAUDER IIC MAD-IIC: 91
MARAUDER IIC MAD-IIC-D: 83
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-C: 83
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-PRIME(I):81

Clans Skirmish top Mechs and # matches:
HELLBRINGER HBR-PRIME: 262
| HELLBRINGER HBR-F(L): 185
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-A: 178
MIST LYNX MLX-G: 164
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC-A: 144
HELLBRINGER HBR-A: 143
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-B: 139
MAD DOG MDD-PRIME: 117
LINEBACKER LBK-PRIME: 113
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-PRIME: 109
MAD DOG MDD-A: 106
HELLBRINGER HBR-B: 98
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME: 87
MARAUDER IIC MAD-IIC-D: 86
TIMBER WOLF TBR-PRIME: 84
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-E: 83
SHADOW CAT SHC-B: 81
HELLBRINGER HBR-F(C): 80
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME(C): 80
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-C: 79

Clans Invasion top mechs and # of matches:
HELLBRINGER HBR-PRIME: 2546
MIST LYNX MLX-G: 2306
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-A: 1923
HELLBRINGER HBR-F(L): 1893
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC-A: 1686
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-B: 1673
LINEBACKER LBK-PRIME: 1655
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-PRIME: 1568
HELLBRINGER HBR-A: 1454
MAD DOG MDD-A: 1300
MAD DOG MDD-PRIME: 1272
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME: 1057
MARAUDER IIC MAD-IIC: 1021
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME(C): 920
MARAUDER IIC MAD-IIC-D: 909
HELLBRINGER HBR-B: 905
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-E: 904
SHADOW CAT SHC-B: 900
HELLBRINGER HBR-F(C): 870
ORION IIC ON1-IIC-A: 851

Clan Domination top Mechs and # of matches:
HELLBRINGER HBR-PRIME: 190
MIST LYNX MLX-G: 171
HELLBRINGER HBR-F(L): 146
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-A: 122
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC-A: 118
LINEBACKER LBK-PRIME: 109
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-B: 92
MAD DOG MDD-PRIME: 91
HELLBRINGER HBR-A: 89
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-PRIME: 84
MARAUDER IIC MAD-IIC: 79
MAD DOG MDD-A: 70
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-C: 67
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME: 64
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC: 62
TIMBER WOLF TBR-PRIME: 62
MARAUDER IIC MAD-IIC-D: 62
SHADOW CAT SHC-B: 62
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-E: 61
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME(C): 60

Clan Scouting top Mechs and # of matches:
HUNTSMAN HMN-P: 4485
NOVA NVA-PRIME: 4246
PAKHET: 4009
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC-B: 3918
NOVA NVA-S: 3339
HUNTSMAN HMN-PRIME: 2931
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC-A: 2771
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC: 2068
HUNTSMAN HMN-B: 1372
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC-C: 1237
HUNTSMAN HMN-C: 1164
SHADOW CAT SHC-B: 1143
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC(C): 1115
SHADOW CAT SHC-P: 1032
VIPER VPR-C: 967
BREAKER: 944
NOVA NVA-PRIME(I): 936
MIST LYNX MLX-G: 921
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-PRIME: 787
NOVA NVA-S(C): 763

Clans Incursion top Mechs and # of matches:
HELLBRINGER HBR-PRIME: 216
LINEBACKER LBK-PRIME: 177
HELLBRINGER HBR-F(L): 170
MIST LYNX MLX-G: 158
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-A: 152
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC-A: 134
HELLBRINGER HBR-A: 127
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-PRIME: 116
MAD DOG MDD-PRIME: 114
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-B: 113
LINEBACKER LBK-D: 112
LINEBACKER LBK-C: 99
HELLBRINGER HBR-B: 94
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME: 92
MAD DOG MDD-A: 87
SHADOW CAT SHC-B: 83
MARAUDER IIC MAD-IIC-D: 79
ARCTIC CHEETAH ACH-E: 78
EBON JAGUAR EBJ-PRIME(C): 74
HUNCHBACK IIC HBK-IIC(C) : 73


Number of players who have participated in at least 1 match during the event:
Davion: 733
Kurita: 995
Liao: 897
Marik: 903
Rasalhague: 585
Steiner: 677
Clan Smoke Jaguar: 914
Clan Jade Falcon: 521
Clan Wolf: 688
Clan Ghost Bear: 608
Clan Nova Cat: 799
Clan Steel Viper: 572
Clan Diamond Shark: 656
None: 89

That is the way I like it!

And considering the Clan's 240 ton cap, it is not surprising the number of Hellbringers (65 tons) that were played due to high hardpoints/ECM and tonnage. At 240 tons IS would have brought T-bolts (before Warhammers/Marauders were released) due being 65 tons and high energy hardpoints also.

Domo arigato (bows)

Edited by Tarl Cabot, 25 October 2017 - 04:39 PM.


#84 Commander A9

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary Rank 8
  • 2,375 posts
  • LocationGDI East Coast Command, Fort Dix, NJ

Posted 25 October 2017 - 06:43 PM

View PostTina Benoit, on 25 October 2017 - 03:58 PM, said:

Total Won Matches per Game Mode:

Inner Sphere
Assault: 54
Conquest: 58
Skirmish: 48
Invasion: 635
Domination: 28
Scouting: 7023
Incursion: 56

Clans
Assault : 85
Conquest: 91
Skirmish: 87
Invasion: 988
Domination: 78
Scouting: 6050
Incursion: 80


Yup. Clans "lost" alright...

#85 Genesis23

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • 227 posts
  • LocationKanton Bern, Switzerland

Posted 26 October 2017 - 02:35 AM

so wait a moment, who actually won? because the numbers clearly speak for clan, but i see no "Clanners have won/IS have won/tie" anywhere in PGIs post.

#86 Muriel Steiner

    Member

  • PipPip
  • The God
  • The God
  • 33 posts

Posted 26 October 2017 - 03:04 AM

based solely on what's been written here, I believe the answer is that nobody "won" because, at the end of the event, the "tug of war" bar wasn't within the "capture threshold" of either faction. It seems that the clan had achieved the "capture threshold" early on, but the inner-sphere launched successful counter-attacks at the end which pulled the bar back into neutrality.

#87 Genesis23

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • 227 posts
  • LocationKanton Bern, Switzerland

Posted 26 October 2017 - 03:16 AM

saw the results post a bit later, but thanks anyway.

a tie is absolute ******** tho, because either you succeed in conquering the planet (=win for clans) or you fail (= win for IS). there is no place for a tie in this event.

also: while i dont know all details of the lore, was the battle of luthien not a "bet" of how many troops would be needed to take the planet? if the clan side failed to do so, then it would be a defeat, right?

Edited by Genesis23, 26 October 2017 - 03:26 AM.


#88 Tarl Cabot

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Tai-sho
  • Tai-sho
  • 7,763 posts
  • LocationImperial City, Luthien - Draconis Combine

Posted 26 October 2017 - 05:09 AM

View PostGenesis23, on 26 October 2017 - 03:16 AM, said:

saw the results post a bit later, but thanks anyway.

a tie is absolute ******** tho, because either you succeed in conquering the planet (=win for clans) or you fail (= win for IS). there is no place for a tie in this event.

That is why PGI write up said it was a Pyrrhic victory. A tie in the event is the same as in the normal FP drops. To truly win the IS had to be on the other end of the bar, which would have allowed them to regain ownership of all the planets that were in play.

The Tukayyid events had been run when CW/FW/FP setup had a winner had greater than 50%. A tie was not possible but then it was a simple win/loss and the units generally came out in force at the end. If the defender won they kept the planet, if they lost the attack owned the planet. But the current setup there are three possible outcomes, a IS or Clan win where the winning side gets to keep their planets and take 4 of their opponents or a tie where no planets change hands.

It does make one wonder though, did those IS forces who were dropping at the end thought that as long they kept the Clans out of that endzone things would be interesting, or was the attempt to move the bar to the or pass the 50% mark? Most likely they were playing to just to be playing and rack up some wins, to show they made an attempt because obviously no one on the Clan side thought otherwise. And it is that reason so many are in a tizzy :)

For the next Capitol event, it will be interesting to see how some play it. From getting the requirements in for the goodies then take a break prior to the end of the event.

#89 Aiden Skye

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Galaxy Commander II
  • Galaxy Commander II
  • 1,364 posts
  • LocationThe Rock

Posted 26 October 2017 - 06:07 AM

Funny that the timberwolf didn't make the top 20 for clans but the mist lynx did.

#90 Bud Crue

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Rage
  • Rage
  • 9,936 posts
  • LocationOn the farm in central Minnesota

Posted 26 October 2017 - 06:48 AM

View PostTina Benoit, on 25 October 2017 - 03:58 PM, said:

Top 20 Mechs used per Game Mode:


So is this the list of mechs that get nerffed next?
Wait...a lot of those carry medium lasers. Its all so clear to me now.

#91 Jay Leon Hart

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Spear
  • The Spear
  • 4,669 posts

Posted 26 October 2017 - 08:03 AM

View PostTarl Cabot, on 26 October 2017 - 05:09 AM, said:

For the next Capitol event, it will be interesting to see how some play it.


Abandon the Tug-of-War "X matches to 100%" method and just count overall matches, with the progress bar being dynamic based on matches played. No wasted matches that way.

View PostBud Crue, on 26 October 2017 - 06:48 AM, said:

So is this the list of mechs that get nerffed next?
Wait...a lot of those carry medium lasers. Its all so clear to me now.

WHAT HAVE WE DONE?!

#92 BUMMBUMM

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • 254 posts
  • LocationHannover

Posted 27 October 2017 - 03:58 AM

Wall-of-Text Stats, i love it, good read.
but the event outcome is still a bummer.
if u insist on keeping the tug of war mechanic you shuould adjust the duration of future events accordingly. since only the last Invasion Phase counts for the overall event outcome, the event duration should only be ONE INVASION PHASE long! pretty simple logic isnt it.

In fact i did put extra effort in this event, like the tukayiid, meaning i played way more FW than i would normaly have. not for the long ago achieved rewards, not for the fun, but for victory.
But since i did not play on the last day of the battle for luthien event, the extra effort was in vain, i got...
Posted Image



#93 Marquis De Lafayette

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2023 Top 12 Qualifier
  • CS 2023 Top 12 Qualifier
  • 1,396 posts
  • LocationIn Valley Forge with General Washington

Posted 27 October 2017 - 08:05 AM

Tina..
I very much appreciate the stats.

Regarding the tug-of-war.....how this latest Halloween event (how it has been set up initially, seems like it will be changed) looks to be set up, was several steps in the wrong direction on the tug-of-war progress bar. I know you want more of a see-saw, but that will drive active players like me out of MWO, as it takes a 11 DAY event and makes only the last couple of hours (which are Oceanic) really count. With +10% moves one side can get it to 100%, win hundreds of more games than the other side and still lose their planet if in the lowest population TZ their opponents can win like 17 (or so) more games than them in those final hours. It might make those final hours better, but it makes there first 10 2/3 days worse....much worse...as In nearly pointless to fight.

I get that you want to keep folks playing, but after how the tug-of-war failed at Luthien (Clans won 530 more invasion games, but only finished +77...due to the end of the tug of war bar negating any advantage to most of those wins) you aren't going to get the same level of dedication from units over multiple days again....under the current system. So, while the last few hours might be better for participation the first 10 2/3 days will be worse....so you lose activity, not gain it.

An 11 day event where every day matters is probably the best solution. Stagger individual rewards based on levels of victory/defeat to make winning each day matter to both sides.

Whatever system you use PGI...don't make it all last timezone dependent (even though it seems fun to add more drama)...that is a recipe for 2/3 of your player base to feel they were made irrelevant...which means a lot of active (in FW) unhappy players...many of whom spend money because of FW. I know you guys can't want to alienate that many players.

Edited by Marquis De Lafayette, 27 October 2017 - 08:06 AM.


#94 Ghastly

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • The Hungry
  • The Hungry
  • 66 posts

Posted 27 October 2017 - 11:57 AM

View PostMarquis De Lafayette, on 27 October 2017 - 08:05 AM, said:

An 11 day event where every day matters is probably the best solution.
But on the other hand, that would turn each of these events simply into a popularity contest. For example, in the current event Kurita is a lot more popular than Rasalhague. We're winning several games by default because there just aren't enough players on the "losing" side. The current setup at least lets players on the less-popular side of a conflict try to hit at a time when they can actually make a difference. Setting it up so each day matters will just make it so the side that starts losing will stop playing; they picked the wrong side at the start, so nothing they do will matter for the rest of the event.

Can we get a count of matches that were won by default because the matchmaker couldn't get an opposing team?

Edited by Ghastly, 27 October 2017 - 11:58 AM.


#95 Marquis De Lafayette

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2023 Top 12 Qualifier
  • CS 2023 Top 12 Qualifier
  • 1,396 posts
  • LocationIn Valley Forge with General Washington

Posted 27 October 2017 - 01:57 PM

View PostGhastly, on 27 October 2017 - 11:57 AM, said:

But on the other hand, that would turn each of these events simply into a popularity contest. For example, in the current event Kurita is a lot more popular than Rasalhague. We're winning several games by default because there just aren't enough players on the "losing" side. The current setup at least lets players on the less-popular side of a conflict try to hit at a time when they can actually make a difference. Setting it up so each day matters will just make it so the side that starts losing will stop playing; they picked the wrong side at the start, so nothing they do will matter for the rest of the event.

Can we get a count of matches that were won by default because the matchmaker couldn't get an opposing team?



I get the concern...they would have to make each day's rewards (win or lose) worth still getting for individuals. As is though 5 straight wins would eliminate a hundred win advantage and result in a tie. A 16 win advantage would flip the slider completely...making the see-saw that easy to tip makes the first 10 days nearly irrelevant to the conflict. PGI needs to find a way to keep players engaged throughout the conflict without making the first 10 days irrelevant

#96 Jungle Rhino

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Veteran Founder
  • Veteran Founder
  • 579 posts
  • LocationNew Zealand

Posted 30 October 2017 - 02:03 AM

It's pretty damn obvious seeing the detailed stats that Grasshoppers need a nerf.

#97 SCHLIMMER BESTIMMER XXX

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • 879 posts
  • LocationNiemalsland

Posted 06 November 2017 - 01:22 PM

View PostIron Lemur, on 21 October 2017 - 03:48 PM, said:

What about it? Win or lose, you got a mech bay (with or without mech). Or am I misunderstanding the question?

i thought you get 2 on win

#98 C E Dwyer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,274 posts
  • LocationHiding in the periphery, from Bounty Hunters

Posted 06 November 2017 - 02:55 PM

View PostGenesis23, on 26 October 2017 - 02:35 AM, said:

so wait a moment, who actually won? because the numbers clearly speak for clan, but i see no "Clanners have won/IS have won/tie" anywhere in PGIs post.

time zones happened like the always do

#99 C E Dwyer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,274 posts
  • LocationHiding in the periphery, from Bounty Hunters

Posted 06 November 2017 - 03:10 PM

View PostJungle Rhino, on 30 October 2017 - 02:03 AM, said:

It's pretty damn obvious seeing the detailed stats that Grasshoppers need a nerf.


Um yeah right....





17 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 17 guests, 0 anonymous users