Sun Spider Pre-Order Is Here!
#81
Posted 10 December 2017 - 03:58 AM
#82
Posted 10 December 2017 - 04:03 AM
Cadoazreal, on 10 December 2017 - 03:58 AM, said:
evidence pls...
Is this based on the 'facts' known by the forumwarriors or actual numbers?
Edited by Cyrilis, 10 December 2017 - 04:04 AM.
#83
Posted 10 December 2017 - 04:23 AM
Cadoazreal, on 10 December 2017 - 03:58 AM, said:
I see more roughnecks than several other heavy IS designs... Cataphracts come to mind. Maybe Dragons...
#84
Posted 10 December 2017 - 04:44 AM
Thank you PGI and Ibradul_Mike!
I think i'll buy the Reinforcement upgrade so I also get the ECM variant.
#85
Posted 10 December 2017 - 05:17 AM
#86
Posted 10 December 2017 - 06:42 AM
Cadoazreal, on 10 December 2017 - 03:58 AM, said:
Before I begin...yes, nostalgia is a thing. But as I said, my personal initial reaction to the Roughneck was 'Oh God, they're doing a stupid Dark Age mech. (Heck with*) that' and I didn't buy the mechpack. I've since purchased the hero for MCs because it actually turned out to be pretty good. There is no such stigma associated with the Sun Spider. But NEVER underestimate the disgust people have with that Wiz Kids abomination.
*Insert epithet of choice.
#87
Posted 10 December 2017 - 08:08 AM
#88
Posted 10 December 2017 - 08:33 AM
#89
Posted 10 December 2017 - 08:55 AM
#90
Posted 10 December 2017 - 09:09 AM
#91
Posted 10 December 2017 - 09:29 AM
#92
Posted 10 December 2017 - 09:43 AM
http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Mangonel
#93
Posted 10 December 2017 - 10:27 AM
Bogus, on 09 December 2017 - 10:17 PM, said:
sorry, Uziel was the box Mech but for MW4 Vengance but not the Starter Mech (I think the MW4:V starter was a Couger but I could be misremembering, however it was definately a Light), you salvage the Uziel farily early in MW4:V the campaign and get a voiceover by the unit mechanic something to the effect of "on the last mission we salvaged an old favorate chassis of mine, the Uziel, it needs some wiring work but it will be ready for your next mission"
probably not the exact wording but that is the general gist of it.
#94
Posted 10 December 2017 - 10:32 AM
Edited by ChapeL, 10 December 2017 - 10:33 AM.
#95
Posted 10 December 2017 - 11:17 AM
Appogee, on 10 December 2017 - 01:33 AM, said:
No, he does not. He deserves to get paid a shitload of money cause he and his artwork skills are what keeps MWO alive. Nothing more, nothing less.
Ed Steele, on 09 December 2017 - 06:42 PM, said:
Inventing Mechs is OK, there have been rules for making custom mechs in TT for years, so I do not see any issue with PGI making Mechs. Actually HBS and Catalyst usually end up making the PGI Mechs canon anyway, so there is no issue. Again, like I have said in previous posts, if you don't like it, don't buy it.
Thats not the point. They crossed the line already with that modified industrial mech. But that story at least is believable. An unknown clan omni, not so much. Whats next, made up weapons to go with the made up mech? They set a bad precedent with said Roughneck and should have kept it that way.
The BT franchise is NOT PGIs to do whatever they please. Its a 30some years old universe with a rich background and history. This is why people love it so much. There are plenty of mechs to pick from without making one up. A friggin clan omni to boot.
If they want to do new stuff, fine. Just rename the game and do whatever the hell you please. But dont advertise it as "a Battletech game", cause it is not. They wonder why the hell ppl quit playing the game and spending money: stuff like this abomination here is one of the reasons.
And not only that: I know I wont touch MW5 or anything they release in the future until it is out for a good amount of time and tested in and out by ppl or magazines i trust. And I know I am not the only one. This is how PGI alienated a good chunk of their (former) paying customers with their head scratching/downright stupid actions.
#97
Posted 10 December 2017 - 12:24 PM
Just like the radar jam, wtf was you idea with that mode, lrms useless for 2 whole minutes...
Edited by ShinRazor, 10 December 2017 - 12:26 PM.
#98
Posted 10 December 2017 - 12:30 PM
It's a super Hellbringer / Ebon Jag / Mad Dog
#99
Posted 10 December 2017 - 12:46 PM
The Zohan, on 10 December 2017 - 11:17 AM, said:
If they want to do new stuff, fine. Just rename the game and do whatever the hell you please. But dont advertise it as "a Battletech game", cause it is not. They wonder why the hell ppl quit playing the game and spending money: stuff like this abomination here is one of the reasons.
If its one of the reasons its an extremely minor reason. Just about every single MW title for PC took major liberties with that 30-some years of lore. Some changes are more objectionable to certain groups than others.
Making up mechs themselves is nothing new. Heck even the venerable MW4 had some interesting takes on tech and at least one made up mech (my fave the Warthog).
So you can not like it, but don't act like PGI has deviated from a script because they all have in some way.
#100
Posted 10 December 2017 - 12:53 PM
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users