2018, The Year Of The Is Omni's?
#1
Posted 13 December 2017 - 08:30 AM
Wave 1
Light - Raptor
Medium - Strider
Heavy - Avatar
Assault - Sunder
Wave 2
Light - Arctic Fox
Medium - Men Shen
Heavy - Blackhawk KU
Assault - Hauptmann
Bonus for owning all of both?
Assault - Templar
That is just my wish list, spread the good into with the rather meh (that should be there regardless, just give them good quirks though)
#2
Posted 13 December 2017 - 08:32 AM
Come on, PGI, give the people what they want - IS Omnimechs! Gimme a Sunder! Give Yeonne a Raptor! But mostly give me a Sunder!
#3
Posted 13 December 2017 - 08:44 AM
#4
Posted 13 December 2017 - 08:48 AM
Bombast, on 13 December 2017 - 08:32 AM, said:
Come on, PGI, give the people what they want -
Yeah! Like an intriguing and interesting CW experience... and some semblance of chassis to chassis balance!
Give the people what they want indeed!!
Oh.
You guys are talking about wanting more mech packs.
Ah.
Yes.
“Content”.
So, sorry. I’ll just be on my way.
#5
Posted 13 December 2017 - 08:55 AM
Bud Crue, on 13 December 2017 - 08:48 AM, said:
CW's crap and honestly, I think it's probably unsalvageable. I've seen the proposals people have made, and oh boy, they range from crappy to so restricting/intricate that it will finally kill it for sure, so complicated that even CW events wont get people to touch it.
Bud Crue, on 13 December 2017 - 08:48 AM, said:
I can complain about more than one thing. We got plenty of balance and gameplay fix threads rolling around, can we not talk about desired chassis too?
#6
Posted 13 December 2017 - 09:00 AM
#7
Posted 13 December 2017 - 09:03 AM
Light - Locust IIC 25 tons
Medium - Shadowhawk IIC 45 tons
Heavy - Rifleman IIC 65 tons
Assault - Warhammer IIC 80 tons
This pack would probably be the only pack that I would considering shelling out bucks for. After that I could care less what mechs are released afterwards.
#9
Posted 13 December 2017 - 09:05 AM
Bud Crue, on 13 December 2017 - 08:48 AM, said:
Give the people what they want indeed!!
Oh.
You guys are talking about wanting more mech packs.
Ah.
Yes.
“Content”.
So, sorry. I’ll just be on my way.
But on topic, I would love to have me a Owens because I'll find some stupid reason to drop in them with a fun build attached.
Also I'll take the Perseus, Orion That acts like a Night Gyr w/o JJ's.
#11
Posted 13 December 2017 - 09:08 AM
Make an Deus Vult Pack
Light:
Medium:
Heavy: Crusader
Assault: Templer
Need some help with the rest of the pack
#12
Posted 13 December 2017 - 09:08 AM
#13
Posted 13 December 2017 - 09:14 AM
Battlemaster56, on 13 December 2017 - 09:05 AM, said:
But on topic, I would love to have me a Owens because I'll find some stupid reason to drop in them with a fun build attached.
Also I'll take the Perseus, Orion That acts like a Night Gyr w/o JJ's.
Perseus is a nice one too
#16
Posted 13 December 2017 - 09:19 AM
Bud Crue, on 13 December 2017 - 08:48 AM, said:
Give the people what they want indeed!!
Oh.
You guys are talking about wanting more mech packs.
Ah.
Yes.
“Content”.
So, sorry. I’ll just be on my way.
Ahh, c'mon!
You know people can want multiple things at the same time? Who said that a mech pack satisfies all other demands? Since mechpacks are a constant which will come regularly for sure to finance the game why not shout some whishes out in addition to gameplay improvements?
And yes, new mechs which allow new interesting builds are indeed content although everyone values the quality differently of cause. Personally there are mechs i want more than some 'real' content like new maps.
#17
Posted 13 December 2017 - 09:20 AM
Wave 1 (The Good)
Raptor
Men Shen
Black Hawk-KU
Templar
*Blackjack-O (Pre-order bonus)
Wave 2 (The Ugly)
Arctic Fox
Battle Cobra
Avatar
Sunder
*Firestarter-O (Pre-order bonus)
Wave 3 (The Bad)
Owens
Strider
Perseus
Hauptmann
#18
Posted 13 December 2017 - 09:25 AM
Want $70 from me, PGI? Raptor ultimate package. Want more than that? Blackhawk-KU, BJ-O, Men Shen, Avatar, and Sunder.
#19
Posted 13 December 2017 - 09:31 AM
Bombast, on 13 December 2017 - 08:55 AM, said:
CW's crap and honestly, I think it's probably unsalvageable. I've seen the proposals people have made, and oh boy, they range from crappy to so restricting/intricate that it will finally kill it for sure, so complicated that even CW events wont get people to touch it.
I can complain about more than one thing. We got plenty of balance and gameplay fix threads rolling around, can we not talk about desired chassis too?
Of course. Just a little joke.
But do consider this, if just in passing:
We know PGI loves data, but that they rarely delve past what the surface of their data shows them.
We know PGI rarely actually engages in the forums and are at best simply aware of the basic discussions.
Threads like this get far more hits and looks than those talking about better/more maps, fixing problems, addressing balance or just about any other issue/want in the game.
PGI undoubtedly sees the data from their forums showing that threads talking about wanting new mechs are THEE most looked at and responded to threads.
What do they do with that? What have they always done with that historically?
A new mech or more every month and everything else is on the back burner because all they see is that in their forums the number 1 thing that folks care to talk about are new mechs and hoped for mech.
People want mechs, that’s why the game exists, I get that, but I fear that what PGI sees from these sorts of threads is that this is really what people want the most and to hell with everything else. After all if people really wanted something else wouldn’t they talk about it on the forums at least as much as they talk about mechs that aren’t yet even in the game? This is after all PGI we are talking about.
Sorry for the derail. My comment really was intended just a joke.
Edited by Bud Crue, 13 December 2017 - 09:33 AM.
#20
Posted 13 December 2017 - 11:27 AM
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users