

Awful Performance Since Meltdown Patch
#1
Posted 06 January 2018 - 08:49 AM
#2
Posted 06 January 2018 - 08:55 AM
#3
Posted 06 January 2018 - 08:56 AM
#4
Posted 06 January 2018 - 09:01 AM
l33tworks, on 06 January 2018 - 08:55 AM, said:
A huge flaw in CPUs. Microsoft just recently patched it. See here: https://www.theregis...pu_design_flaw/
Edited by RelativeQuanta, 06 January 2018 - 09:02 AM.
#5
Posted 06 January 2018 - 09:25 AM
RelativeQuanta, on 06 January 2018 - 09:01 AM, said:
A huge flaw in CPUs. Microsoft just recently patched it. See here: https://www.theregis...pu_design_flaw/
Gaddamn, that's a big screw-up on the part of Intel. I didn't even know about this.
#6
Posted 06 January 2018 - 09:50 AM
Radio Wolf, on 06 January 2018 - 09:25 AM, said:
It's not just Intel, it's AMD plus others as well, if it has a cpu it's likely to be vulnerable..
All those people that said I was paranoid about using cloud for personal details..
#7
Posted 06 January 2018 - 09:58 AM
Edited by Burke IV, 06 January 2018 - 09:58 AM.
#8
Posted 06 January 2018 - 10:03 AM
AMD is not vulnerable to that sort of remote attack bcs the Bug only can happen if the Computer is up and running from inside the OS so an attacker would need direct access to it - that is why MS did not update AMD Computers so far.
CPUs up to Bulldozer are not affected at all!
That means no Performance Hit for AMD!
Edited by Thorqemada, 06 January 2018 - 10:08 AM.
#9
Posted 06 January 2018 - 10:07 AM
Cathy, on 06 January 2018 - 09:50 AM, said:
The article did quote AMD as bragging that they weren't affected though...makes me wish I had bought AMD instead of the i7.
Edited by Radio Wolf, 06 January 2018 - 10:08 AM.
#10
Posted 06 January 2018 - 10:22 AM
https://www.planet3d...re-meltdown.png
Affected Intel CPUs:
- Intel® Core™ i3 processor (45nm and 32nm)
- Intel® Core™ i5 processor (45nm and 32nm)
- Intel® Core™ i7 processor (45nm and 32nm)
- Intel® Core™ M processor family (45nm and 32nm)
- 2nd generation Intel® Core™ processors
- 3rd generation Intel® Core™ processors
- 4th generation Intel® Core™ processors
- 5th generation Intel® Core™ processors
- 6th generation Intel® Core™ processors
- 7th generation Intel® Core™ processors
- 8th generation Intel® Core™ processors
- Intel® Core™ X-series Processor Family for Intel® X99 platforms
- Intel® Core™ X-series Processor Family for Intel® X299 platforms
- Intel® Xeon® processor 3400 series
- Intel® Xeon® processor 3600 series
- Intel® Xeon® processor 5500 series
- Intel® Xeon® processor 5600 series
- Intel® Xeon® processor 6500 series
- Intel® Xeon® processor 7500 series
- Intel® Xeon® Processor E3 Family
- Intel® Xeon® Processor E3 v2 Family
- Intel® Xeon® Processor E3 v3 Family
- Intel® Xeon® Processor E3 v4 Family
- Intel® Xeon® Processor E3 v5 Family
- Intel® Xeon® Processor E3 v6 Family
- Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 Family
- Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 v2 Family
- Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 v3 Family
- Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 v4 Family
- Intel® Xeon® Processor E7 Family
- Intel® Xeon® Processor E7 v2 Family
- Intel® Xeon® Processor E7 v3 Family
- Intel® Xeon® Processor E7 v4 Family
- Intel® Xeon® Processor Scalable Family
- Intel® Xeon Phi™ Processor 3200, 5200, 7200 Series
- Intel® Atom™ Processor C Series
- Intel® Atom™ Processor E Series
- Intel® Atom™ Processor A Series
- Intel® Atom™ Processor x3 Series
- Intel® Atom™ Processor Z Series
- Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series
- Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series
- Intel® Pentium® Processor J Series
- Intel® Pentium® Processor N Series
Edited by Thorqemada, 06 January 2018 - 10:50 AM.
#11
Posted 06 January 2018 - 10:38 AM
https://www.computer...herheitsluecke/
#12
Posted 06 January 2018 - 10:44 AM
http://www.dailymail...lion-stock.html
Edited by Thorqemada, 06 January 2018 - 10:46 AM.
#13
Posted 06 January 2018 - 10:45 AM
I haven't noticed a performance in SWTOR Galactic Starfighter, my other online game. But from what I've read, MWO is particularly CPU intensive so this could be expected.
https://www.reddit.c...668&sh=05178cf6
#15
Posted 06 January 2018 - 10:54 AM
RelativeQuanta, on 06 January 2018 - 08:49 AM, said:
I updated my Windows yesterday (5th) and i did not noticed any performance issues aside my own imagination. But i read Haswell CPUs (22nm), which i have (a youngest i5, 4430), and all more modern cores, bear a technology which saves them from most of performance drops. I do not know if this is a placebo.
Since you name a 6***, you should not be affected too.
In any case, it is a software, they will fix it or lose an Atlas-ton of money, Endure.
P.S. I tested my performance on Attila Total War (same results), Rome Total War (same-ish results, i do not remember original FPS from benchmark, but it was close), Star Citizen (as crappy crap as it was after 3.0). I play MWO today to test, too. All seems to be as i remember. Clams are cheaty buggers though, but i doubt my CPU is in cahoots with them

Edited by Sigmar Sich, 06 January 2018 - 11:19 AM.
#17
Posted 06 January 2018 - 11:28 AM
Seranov, on 06 January 2018 - 08:56 AM, said:
I'm curious if that 30% performance hit is for one or both patches. Intel rigs are going to need patching for both Spectre AND Meltdown which means their performance will likely be hit on two fronts.
#18
Posted 06 January 2018 - 11:33 AM
#19
Posted 06 January 2018 - 11:37 AM
https://www.theverge...n-security-flaw
1. Laptop.. when was last time the vents/heatsinks were blown out of any dust buildup? Time of the year where it is cold outside and heat is on inside.
2. Check Windows update to see if windows updated recent GPU drivers (on by default and can foul things up).
Edited by Tarl Cabot, 06 January 2018 - 11:38 AM.
#20
Posted 06 January 2018 - 11:39 AM
VonBruinwald, on 06 January 2018 - 11:28 AM, said:
I'm curious if that 30% performance hit is for one or both patches. Intel rigs are going to need patching for both Spectre AND Meltdown which means their performance will likely be hit on two fronts.
Not sure. They also said 30% was an absolute worst-case scenario. It's likely to be less for most folks.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users