Bud Crue, on 12 February 2018 - 04:54 AM, said:
Hope so. If the choice is "less broken or nothing", i'll take less broken. I do support the balancing effort.
However, it is not enough to make MWO fun again. And i fear asking for minor changes, without some feature improvements, is just a waste of the momentum "Unfunning of MWO" have created.
It doesn't really matter how nice you paint walls of a building, if basement is flooded with wastes. Such building will be uncomfortable to live anyway, without fixing pipes.
Though i do understand the idea of baby steps, but i'm afraid there will be only one step allowed. For example PGI implements some suggested features, and they will be sure they did everything community wanted, and will be deaf to any next suggestions.
Bud Crue, on 12 February 2018 - 04:54 AM, said:
Maybe poor choice of words on my part, i meant this - chassis able to monoboat are obvious choice over chassis that can't. I want those non-boats to be a valid option. Ability to boat is a quirk itself (same as hardpoint placement and hitboxes, were "quirks" before quirks were introduced). So there is need to compensate those non-boats, preferably buffing less numerous hardpoint type.
For example, when people say "Bushwacker", they most likely mean P1, with 6 missile hardpoints; not other bushies, because choice is obvious. This is what makes me sad about boating.