Public Test Session Is Live With Rewards!
#61
Posted 13 July 2018 - 03:01 PM
#62
Posted 13 July 2018 - 03:03 PM
#63
Posted 13 July 2018 - 03:07 PM
Jarvssen, on 13 July 2018 - 01:42 PM, said:
my tracker is 0/10, ive played many matches already as well... and always getting well over 150 match score, (let alone the minimum 50)
edit: removed video now that its fixed
Edited by Aleksandr Sergeyevich Kerensky, 13 July 2018 - 07:22 PM.
#65
Posted 13 July 2018 - 03:29 PM
#67
Posted 13 July 2018 - 04:08 PM
Jack Shayu Walker, on 13 July 2018 - 12:41 PM, said:
They did not, in fact, reduce the duration of er medium lasers from the live patch. In fact they did not reduce the duration of ANY of the lasers except the heavy medium. You can check for yourself.
Playing clans is turning into wastebin wars.
My bad. I have not played MWO since HBS BT came out so it has been quite a while. I thought either the duration or cooldown of cerML was longer than cerLL.
#68
Posted 13 July 2018 - 04:18 PM
#69
Posted 13 July 2018 - 04:36 PM
Nerfs and buffs - nothing, just add FUN to this game, plz.
#71
Posted 13 July 2018 - 05:41 PM
#72
Posted 13 July 2018 - 05:41 PM
Also another update to the news post, here's what the Warhorn looks like:
#73
Posted 13 July 2018 - 06:12 PM
#74
Posted 13 July 2018 - 06:31 PM
I couldn't tell the damage, a lot of my 10 games were 4 lighter mechs against 4 assaults. Or 1 assault against 3.
#75
Posted 13 July 2018 - 06:58 PM
Tina Benoit, on 13 July 2018 - 05:41 PM, said:
Also another update to the news post, here's what the Warhorn looks like:
thank you so much Tina! now for me to get back into testing PTS!
#76
Posted 13 July 2018 - 07:08 PM
11r, on 13 July 2018 - 04:36 PM, said:
Nerfs and buffs - nothing, just add FUN to this game, plz.
Teamwork OPed, mate. Can't Nerf the player, Nerf the game!
#77
Posted 13 July 2018 - 07:10 PM
Not much to say except what I already said before.
- A big NO to C-Gauss recoil (that S* is supposed to be a small recoil?!). Problem was never C-Gauss. Boost IS Gauss instead (health, explosion chance, explosion damage, hell,... even damage)
- CERSLs: on the edge of being useless. huge heat is still there for little outcome
- CERMLs: dead. no advantage over IS. has every disadvantage imaginable. (in before anyone says 0.25 (lol) damage advantage, you have to realize that the duration is so long (+ 40%) that for the same period of burn, you're gonna do way less damage to where you are aiming compared to IS... also heat is so unimaginably huge that its just a bad joke)
- CERLL: Nothing changed in terms of performance. Mechs that were the problem with "big alphas" are now even stronger over longer distances
- CHML: was a useless weapon... now is the joke of the century (geographical scale cooldown time, immense heat, no damage)
- CHLL: Still manageable, too much heat for the new damage.
- CMPL: Still manageable.
- CLPL: No one was using this weapon anyway... due to weight, no one is going to put 3 when they can pack 3 ERs (the correct approach would have been SIGNIFICANT heat reduction and CD boosts)
This is just another PTS so that some self-centered individuals at PGI can refer to it and then go on and say that their destructive path of killing MWO is based on community feedback.
Remember when they first presented C-Gauss recoil idea?... The entire community told them in the corresponding thread that its a bad idea.
What did they do?
They released this PTS claiming that the majority of the player-base gave positive feedback regarding Gauss recoil. Right to our faces with no shame!!!
Edited by Navid A1, 13 July 2018 - 07:14 PM.
#78
Posted 13 July 2018 - 07:26 PM
#79
Posted 13 July 2018 - 08:10 PM
#80
Posted 13 July 2018 - 08:12 PM
Dee Eight, on 13 July 2018 - 01:36 PM, said:
Since the point to the testing is to evaluate the clan weapon changes... shouldn't the rewards be restricted to people using clan mechs ?
Since the entire point is to test their viability against ALL mechs, no. someone's got to be the control group.
8 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 8 guests, 0 anonymous users