| |
OVERVIEW | |
Tonnage | 80 |
Engine | 320 Standard |
Top Speed | 64.8 kph |
Max Engine Rating | 385 |
Armor | 440 Ferro-Fibrous |
Internal Structure | Endo-Steel |
Heat Sinks | 12 Double |
Jump Jets | 0 (0 Max) |
ECM Capable | No |
MASC Capable | No |
WEAPONS AND EQUIPMENT | |
Head | |
Left Arm | LB 10-X AC |
Left Torso | Streak SRM 6, ER Medium Laser, Streak SRM Ammo, LB 10-X Ammo |
Center Torso | Engine, ER Medium Laser |
Right Torso | Streak SRM 6, ER Medium Laser, Streak SRM Ammo, LB 10-X Ammo |
Right Arm | LB 10-X AC |
Left Leg | |
Right Leg | |
HARDPOINTS | |
Head | |
Left Arm | 1 Ballistic (Actuators: Upper, Lower) |
Left Torso | 1 Energy, 2 Missile |
Center Torso | 1 Energy, 1 AMS |
Right Torso | 1 Energy, 1 Missile |
Right Arm | 1 Ballistic (Actuators: Upper, Lower) |
Warhammer Iic New Variant Added Early Adopters Extended
#1
Posted 06 December 2018 - 02:03 PM
#2
Posted 06 December 2018 - 02:07 PM
Edited by FATA13RR0R, 06 December 2018 - 02:08 PM.
#3
Posted 06 December 2018 - 02:13 PM
#4
Posted 06 December 2018 - 02:13 PM
I am actually pretty cool with the stock loadout - I mean I will probably dump the streaks for a different flavor of missile - but I like it.
Could probably do a light variant of the MadCat Mk2 - double gauss, 3er med, and a pair of lurm 10s... any way you cut it, I like it.
#5
Posted 06 December 2018 - 02:14 PM
#6
Posted 06 December 2018 - 02:15 PM
#7
Posted 06 December 2018 - 02:18 PM
#8
Posted 06 December 2018 - 02:19 PM
Thanks Matt and Russ for talking and making this mech come to fruition! Love how different it is than the rest of the whammys iic's!
#9
Posted 06 December 2018 - 02:19 PM
Thanks again for owning up to a mistake and working on doing the right thing.
Now to see the the complainers in the thread.
Edited by Will9761, 06 December 2018 - 02:21 PM.
#10
Posted 06 December 2018 - 02:20 PM
#11
Posted 06 December 2018 - 02:25 PM
#12
Posted 06 December 2018 - 02:37 PM
FireStoat, on 06 December 2018 - 02:14 PM, said:
The "-A" designation on a Battlemech indicates a 'mech invented by PGI that is not part of the original canon. Same goes for all the other Clan Battlemechs. (Nearly all of them have at least one example, as there weren't 5, or even 3, Canon variants for PGI to use to make a 'mech pack).
Edited by C337Skymaster, 06 December 2018 - 02:42 PM.
#13
Posted 06 December 2018 - 02:50 PM
LONZA, on 06 December 2018 - 02:48 PM, said:
The Corsair is not comparable because the MWO twitter feed didn't make a comment urging people to place a pre-order before Mech Con and that people might regret if they did not pre-order. This only happened with the Whammy IIC.
#14
Posted 06 December 2018 - 02:50 PM
LONZA, on 06 December 2018 - 02:48 PM, said:
Well, I haven't started tweeting the countdown for the Corsair yet so I guess there is a Chance I will **** that up.
Fingers Crossed
Just Kidding I never make the same mistakes twice...I make them 3 times.
#15
Posted 06 December 2018 - 02:51 PM
#16
Posted 06 December 2018 - 02:51 PM
LONZA, on 06 December 2018 - 02:48 PM, said:
Why? The entire point of the extra variant is to make amends for the accidental FOMO that happened due to a miscommunication. No such thing happened with the Corsair. Further, this also resolves one of the larger complaints the WHM-IIC variants created: lack of hardpoint variety. It was all energy based except for one missile boat, with virtual duplicate variants, and no ballistic options outside of the hero. Now there's a ballistic option, making this a well rounded overall chassis.
#19
Posted 06 December 2018 - 02:59 PM
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users