Jump to content

Solaris= The Biggest Waste Of Money Ever


52 replies to this topic

#1 Papaspud

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 643 posts
  • LocationIdaho, USA

Posted 26 January 2019 - 03:53 AM

we have an event= can't find a match, what a joke. How about make a few new maps?????????

#2 Brizna

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Liquid Metal
  • Liquid Metal
  • 1,363 posts
  • LocationCatalonia

Posted 26 January 2019 - 04:02 AM

Solaris is fundamentally flawed, more maps wouldn't fix it. It was actually pretty obvious to anyone who had done one or two 1 vs 1 player run tournaments that 1 vs 1 is nice to have some relaxed fun with friends every few months but that it is immensely dull and uninteresting in the long run, it simply lacks the depth and variation required to stay interesting. Thing is I don't think people who run this game play much of it and are out of touch with reality, so they wasted a huge deal of effort in a doomed game mode and are probably still wondering why Solaris failed so miserably.

#3 JediPanther

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 4,087 posts
  • LocationLost in my C1

Posted 26 January 2019 - 11:34 AM

If you wanted a list of 'biggest wastes' here's a few to get started:
1. Knockdowns added then removed because paul made a great bowing pin
2. IK. Removed...Because coding is too hard.
3. ESCORT...We can't show how horrible we are in that we can't even make a mech go down a path while we try and pre-order our AI filled game.
4. TRANSVERSE.
5. Gold Mech skin at $500 per mech.
6. Ghost heat.
7. REscale the lights into oblivion.
8. Long Tom.
9. Seven divisions for a 1 vs 1 and 2 vs 2 game mode.
10. Central feature with choke map lanes moba design in an arena shooter.

#4 Y E O N N E

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 16,810 posts

Posted 26 January 2019 - 11:48 AM

View PostBrizna, on 26 January 2019 - 04:02 AM, said:

Solaris is fundamentally flawed, more maps wouldn't fix it. It was actually pretty obvious to anyone who had done one or two 1 vs 1 player run tournaments that 1 vs 1 is nice to have some relaxed fun with friends every few months but that it is immensely dull and uninteresting in the long run, it simply lacks the depth and variation required to stay interesting. Thing is I don't think people who run this game play much of it and are out of touch with reality, so they wasted a huge deal of effort in a doomed game mode and are probably still wondering why Solaris failed so miserably.


They could salvage a lot of the work that went into Solaris 7 by creating an 8v8 or 12v12 "Solaris" mode and expanding on the MM infrastructure to properly allocate 'Mechs by pilot ELO and division to each team.

But no, it won't happen.

#5 Spheroid

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Veteran Founder
  • Veteran Founder
  • 5,064 posts
  • LocationSouthern Wisconsin

Posted 26 January 2019 - 12:07 PM

View PostJediPanther, on 26 January 2019 - 11:34 AM, said:

If you wanted a list of 'biggest wastes' here's a few to get started:

6. Ghost heat.



Not a waste at all. It is in fact the most labor efficient method of dealing with large pinpoint alphas that have been part of first person MechWarrior for over twenty-five years. The only ways of attacking pinpoint is either a cone of fire or random hit tables. Notice that no company in the history of first person BattleTech has gone this route. Do you think that is coincidence?

With a clean slate they could have chosen any fire mechanic they wanted to for MW5 and did not choose the above. I assume you are one of two opinions, either alphas should be unlimited or there should be spread. Please declare where you stand.

Edited by Spheroid, 26 January 2019 - 04:08 PM.


#6 Alcom Isst

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Professional
  • The Professional
  • 935 posts
  • LocationElo Heaven

Posted 26 January 2019 - 12:55 PM

View PostBrizna, on 26 January 2019 - 04:02 AM, said:

Solaris is fundamentally flawed, more maps wouldn't fix it. It was actually pretty obvious to anyone who had done one or two 1 vs 1 player run tournaments that 1 vs 1 is nice to have some relaxed fun with friends every few months but that it is immensely dull and uninteresting in the long run, it simply lacks the depth and variation required to stay interesting. Thing is I don't think people who run this game play much of it and are out of touch with reality, so they wasted a huge deal of effort in a doomed game mode and are probably still wondering why Solaris failed so miserably.

A majority of Solaris fights where there isn't a fast light/medium involved turn into pure DPS fights, where it's a matter of who has the better build, who fired the first shot, and who has the better aim. There's as much depth and complexity in an entire Solaris match as there is in the first 5 seconds of a typical 1v1 fighter.

Like once you involve faster mechs like Arctic Wolf, Wolfhound, and Assassin (not Piranha, Piranha is cancer), you start to see more complex positioning and conditioning, and occasionally you get some weird mind games with heavier mechs. Such depth is more the exception than the norm though.

#7 Monkey Lover

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 7,918 posts
  • LocationWazan

Posted 26 January 2019 - 01:23 PM

The issue is they gave up on mwo. Solaris hasn't seen a real update from when it started.

The design issues with the gui were never fixed. The launcher issues with 7 buttons was never fixed.

#8 Jackal Noble

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,863 posts
  • LocationTerra

Posted 26 January 2019 - 03:03 PM

Pls tell me. How much actual money was spent on this? I'm dying to know.

#9 adamts01

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Death Star
  • 3,417 posts
  • LocationPhilippines

Posted 26 January 2019 - 03:29 PM

View PostJackal Noble, on 26 January 2019 - 03:03 PM, said:

Pls tell me. How much actual money was spent on this? I'm dying to know.
Since the mode was a failure, as everyone but a few epeen wavers said it would be, any amount of money was a waste.

What's frustrating is that it was a very, very small crowd who liked 1v1s, and they already had an outlet for that through private matches. Yes, those took memberships, but all the more reason to keep it like that. Forget all the ridiculous buckets within another bucket, private matches also removed all the fuss ohf match making and mech/loadout hassle.

#10 Bud Crue

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Rage
  • Rage
  • 9,954 posts
  • LocationOn the farm in central Minnesota

Posted 26 January 2019 - 03:32 PM

View PostJackal Noble, on 26 January 2019 - 03:03 PM, said:

Pls tell me. How much actual money was spent on this? I'm dying to know.



Oooo...lets give it a shot:

So Russ said that a map in this game cost PGI $250K each. We got how many maps with Solaris? Lets see...Cave, Colosseum, the forest one, the factory, the Ice one...and I think one more, but for the life of me I can't remember. So anyway, lets call it 6 maps at 200K each (they are small so lets give a discount). That right there, is $1.2 Million just in maps.

The little intro animations must have been another couple hundred grand right (those lil spiders on Caves don't animate themselves); and of course the GUI where we get to select sponsors, and which tier we want to play must have cost serious cash in programing time...let's say 4 people dedicated for a year at 75K each, for another $300K. So were up to $1.7 mil. Duncan Fisher voice overs probably cost them another 50K. Chris's dedication to balancing the divisions (which is just awesome given all the diversity) must cost some portion of his salary, so lets add another 50K. Which gets us to $1.8 million.

Add another 200K for all the folks putting together events, seasons and rewards, the folks they hired to actually take the time to reprogram how flamers work and redo the functionality of consumables, redo the website to add "Solaris 7" to all aspects of the game, and all the rest, and we get to a clean $2 million bucks for a mode that as embodied, no one asked for and few play.

If only they had blown 2 million bucks* on paying a statistician who understood how to deal with outliers and maybe hiring a couple of comp guys to give them advice regarding balance and game play mechanics.





*What's sad is that i am being conservative. They probably spent a hell of a lot more.

#11 crazytimes

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 1,381 posts

Posted 26 January 2019 - 03:35 PM

1v1 is not really my thing. Judging by the difficulty in finding matches for events... it is not really anybodies thing, except for a very small crowd with super optimised mechs for solaris.

That crowd inspired me to never touch solaris again, even for events.

#12 HammerMaster

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Benefactor
  • The Benefactor
  • 2,516 posts
  • LocationNew Hampshire, USA

Posted 26 January 2019 - 03:39 PM

It would have been better served by less division buckets and a better SPECTATOR involvement.

#13 Koniving

    Welcoming Committee

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Guide
  • The Guide
  • 23,384 posts

Posted 26 January 2019 - 03:44 PM

View PostBrizna, on 26 January 2019 - 04:02 AM, said:

Solaris is fundamentally flawed, more maps wouldn't fix it. It was actually pretty obvious to anyone who had done one or two 1 vs 1 player run tournaments that 1 vs 1 is nice to have some relaxed fun with friends every few months but that it is immensely dull and uninteresting in the long run, it simply lacks the depth and variation required to stay interesting. Thing is I don't think people who run this game play much of it and are out of touch with reality, so they wasted a huge deal of effort in a doomed game mode and are probably still wondering why Solaris failed so miserably.


I have an idea (edit: as to one of the reasons it was fundamentally flawed) which I shared pretty early on.
Note that the Solaris VII we have...sounds nothing like this.
Spoiler

Interesting battles that are not so much one on one matches, but challenges against both the opponents AND the environment AND "fan flare" (things thrown in to make it fun for the fans, sometimes by the fans...in our case the spectators).

Edited by Koniving, 26 January 2019 - 03:46 PM.


#14 HammerMaster

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Benefactor
  • The Benefactor
  • 2,516 posts
  • LocationNew Hampshire, USA

Posted 26 January 2019 - 03:56 PM

View PostKoniving, on 26 January 2019 - 03:44 PM, said:


I have an idea (edit: as to one of the reasons it was fundamentally flawed) which I shared pretty early on.
Note that the Solaris VII we have...sounds nothing like this.
Spoiler

Interesting battles that are not so much one on one matches, but challenges against both the opponents AND the environment AND "fan flare" (things thrown in to make it fun for the fans, sometimes by the fans...in our case the spectators).

Holy crap source material not read again as PGI ignored it. Made their own. It works how well? Typical!

#15 LordNothing

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 17,295 posts

Posted 26 January 2019 - 05:16 PM

when i thought solaris i thought we would get free for all like we had in mw4 or living legends. 1v1/2v2 isnt exactly what i wanted.

i think what i would have done instead is to roll a much more robust custom game system with a lobby browser. then take all the lesser played modes and move them to that. find/create the match you want to play and join up. and when i mean robust i really mean robust. like give players control of everything, like match time, tonnage restrictions, whether or not to use a drop deck, or if you want infinite respawns, number of players (even asymmetrical games like stars vs lances), make all maps/modes available. like if you want to do a 1 life skirmish on boreal vault you could. and let players vote with their lobby settings and what games they want to join.

Edited by LordNothing, 26 January 2019 - 05:19 PM.


#16 Dee Eight

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 6,271 posts

Posted 26 January 2019 - 05:20 PM

View PostY E O N N E, on 26 January 2019 - 11:48 AM, said:


They could salvage a lot of the work that went into Solaris 7 by creating an 8v8 or 12v12 "Solaris" mode and expanding on the MM infrastructure to properly allocate 'Mechs by pilot ELO and division to each team.

But no, it won't happen.

No.. what Solaris should have been, based on the Solaris that was in MW3... was a free for all with five or six on the field at the same time.

#17 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 26 January 2019 - 05:26 PM

View PostDee Eight, on 26 January 2019 - 05:20 PM, said:

No.. what Solaris should have been, based on the Solaris that was in MW3... was a free for all with five or six on the field at the same time.

MW3 didn't have a Solaris or FF mode.

#18 thievingmagpi

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,577 posts

Posted 26 January 2019 - 05:28 PM

i was real drunk last night and actually had a blast in solaris, but there were lots of people dropping and matches were relatively fast.

more proof that

1) solaris should be an event that happens maybe a few days per month

2) mwo is better when drunk

Edited by thievingmagpi, 26 January 2019 - 08:05 PM.


#19 Koniving

    Welcoming Committee

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Guide
  • The Guide
  • 23,384 posts

Posted 26 January 2019 - 06:05 PM

View PostHammerMaster, on 26 January 2019 - 03:56 PM, said:

Holy crap source material not read again as PGI ignored it. Made their own. It works how well? Typical!

Sarcasm aside, if some of this was done anything like the Solaris 7 maps as described, they'd have to make a number of game modes... and King of the Hill wouldn't be all that satisfying without knockdowns. One of the map typically has turrets hiding in the floors and walls. The mudpit... nobody could move well at all with no walls...that wouldn't be fun in MWO as unlike over there, we can fire everything at once with incredible accuracy...as opposed to how Solaris solved it.
Spoiler


Steiner's pretty interesting though, the walls will move, creating pillars, full walls, orchestrating mazes that change every 10 to 20 seconds, potentially lifting mechs in the air or sending them dropping to potentially their death [if moving too fast, raised up and you 'run off', or you're raised up and the kinetic energy of being hit knocks you over]. But again... this would require MWO to have physics while you're mech's alive...not just when you're dead (twin AC/20s hit so hard that a if a mech dies with a lot of overkill damage they can be sent flying short distances... so why not when alive?)

Though the coolest concept of all is Davion's map. It renders solid holograms and can recreate weather conditions, too. It can recreate any of the other maps as well as other things. Basically, you could set it to be the "random" map... And then the Colosseum would 'materialize' like VR coming to reality, or a slower buildup of the Star Trek holodeck. ...while not cheap to create the effect for I'm sure, just imagine if they only went the cheap route...and had it "create" MW2 style maps. Could've been a neat little place to experiment with "map generation". Given the lore, we wouldn't expect perfect maps and there'd be no memorizing the layout.

Anyway... Such is just how it goes.

#20 JediPanther

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 4,087 posts
  • LocationLost in my C1

Posted 26 January 2019 - 06:24 PM

View PostSpheroid, on 26 January 2019 - 12:07 PM, said:


Not a waste at all. It is in fact the most labor efficient method of dealing with large pinpoint alphas that have been part of first person MechWarrior for over twenty-five years. The only ways of attacking pinpoint is either a cone of fire or random hit tables. Notice that no company in the history of first person BattleTech has gone this route. Do you think that is coincidence?

With a clean slate they could have chosen any fire mechanic they wanted to for MW5 and did not choose the above. I assume you are one of two opinions, either alphas should be unlimited or there should be spread. Please declare where you stand.

I'd rather alphas be spread. Power creep is going to happen in the game no matter what but at least with spread damage you wouldn't hear of the double-tripile damage complaints of insta-gibed from a full ct to dead or instantly loosing part of your mech. that was why in cb with streaks went for nothing but the ct or when the K2's dual ac 20 or the A1's srm 6s builds were so bad and the pinnacle of highest alpha. Now you look at an alpha of 40 like nothing.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users