Jump to content

Limit Class Based On Score In Qp


84 replies to this topic

#81 Fallingfloor

    Member

  • Pip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 17 posts

Posted 15 February 2019 - 08:45 AM

My solution is to stop handing out C-bills in the form of cadet bonus and events. Back in 2013 you had to EARN that AS7-D. By the time you could afford it you understood how to play.

#82 Mystere

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 22,783 posts
  • LocationClassified

Posted 24 February 2019 - 12:51 AM

View PostNameless King, on 13 February 2019 - 06:18 PM, said:

So you want to play a worse game. Can we stop with the Bad Ideas please.


I think WT's orders of magnitude larger player base speaks for itself. <shrugs>

#83 ingramli

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • 554 posts

Posted 24 February 2019 - 01:01 AM

View PostFallingfloor, on 15 February 2019 - 08:45 AM, said:

My solution is to stop handing out C-bills in the form of cadet bonus and events. Back in 2013 you had to EARN that AS7-D. By the time you could afford it you understood how to play.

You also have to remove the assaults mechs from the trial list, direwolfs and kdk-3 is really popular when they are available as trial mechs.

#84 BlueStrat

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 239 posts

Posted 24 February 2019 - 12:10 PM

LMAO! Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image

If you think it's OK to limit playerss' ability to pilot heavier weight classes based on performance stats, think how *you* would feel if they turned it upside down and limited players with extremely good stats from heavier weight classes, so players with the highest stats can only play lights, and a player like a Proton, a 20-ton light with only one weapon.

Doesn't sound like such a great idea now, does it?

Funny how that works when it's suddenly *your* ox getting gored! Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image

Edited by BlueStrat, 24 February 2019 - 12:22 PM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users