Jump to content

More Engine Dhs Sockets


28 replies to this topic

#1 ACH75

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Grizzly
  • The Grizzly
  • 251 posts

Posted 18 February 2019 - 09:10 PM

IS DHS take a lot of space often preventing the use of Endo-Steel...

I think should be nice to have more engines dhs sockets

#2 GeminiWolf

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Howl
  • The Howl
  • 743 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 18 February 2019 - 09:22 PM

Negative

#3 R Valentine

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Heavy Lifter
  • Heavy Lifter
  • 1,744 posts

Posted 18 February 2019 - 09:23 PM

View PostGeminiWolf, on 18 February 2019 - 09:22 PM, said:

Negative


Yeah, peon IS pilot! How dare you wish for some semblance of parity!

#4 Mister Maf

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 351 posts
  • LocationAtlanta

Posted 18 February 2019 - 09:30 PM

I was ready to write this off offhand as unnecessary, but that actually might not be a bad buff for Standard and/or IS XL engines to make them more attractive. Makes sense for XL since they're so big IMO.

Edited by Mister Maf, 18 February 2019 - 09:31 PM.


#5 Jackal Noble

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,863 posts
  • LocationTerra

Posted 18 February 2019 - 09:56 PM

I agree, Clan XLs should get like twice as many DHS 'sockets' <?.

#6 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 18 February 2019 - 09:57 PM

Semi-related: Being able to mix SHS with DHS would be nice for filling in those last slots in weird places (obviously requiring a rebalancing of SHS dissipation and capacity values).

#7 El Bandito

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 26,736 posts
  • LocationStill doing ungodly amount of damage, but with more accuracy.

Posted 18 February 2019 - 10:47 PM

Allow battlemechs to remove the useless hand actuators. That way IS can at least put 3 DHS per arm.

#8 BrunoSSace

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Guide
  • The Guide
  • 1,032 posts
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 18 February 2019 - 10:48 PM

Even if this was a semi good idea, the Clan players will Veto this quickly. They are already salty at "cough" Inner Sphere super quirks. Truth is, balance is pretty good atm, I'm happy with it.

#9 Stonefalcon

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Messenger
  • The Messenger
  • 1,384 posts
  • LocationProselytizing in the name of Our Lord and Savior the Annihilator

Posted 18 February 2019 - 11:00 PM

Posted Image

#10 Sjorpha

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 4,480 posts
  • LocationSweden

Posted 18 February 2019 - 11:27 PM

I could see extra heatsinks slots as a way to balance is engines better against cxl.

#11 ShiverMeRivets

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • 520 posts

Posted 19 February 2019 - 12:42 AM

I will support a bonus engine slot to STD engines only (IS and Clan). This will make STD engines slightly more useful vs. LFE/cXL. The IS will enjoy this more, true.

#12 Khobai

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 23,969 posts

Posted 19 February 2019 - 12:54 AM

No. I dont agree with IS mechs getting more DHS slots. Because giving IS mechs more DHS slots doesnt really solve the problem. More DHS slots just means IS has to spend that much more tonnage on DHS. So at best youre just trading tonnage for crit slots, and its still not impactful enough to make up for CES/CFF being vastly better than ISES/ISFF.

Instead all IS DHS (both internal and external) should just be true double heatsinks. IS pay more for their DHS so their DHS should be better. Its that simple. Making all IS DHS true dubs would balance the fact they take up 3 crit slots instead of only 2 crit slots.

Also the issue of ISES/ISFF sucking compared to their clan versions needs to be addressed. Because thats another huge reason why IS mechs are starved on crit slots. Like ISDHS, if ISES/ISFF cost more then they also need to DO more.

And ISXL should survive side torso destruction (also LFE and STD should get buffed). because right now CXL is vastly superior to every other engine type. All the different engines need to be completely rebalanced to be brought into parity with eachother.

PGI really needs to balance the fundamental tech bases for IS and Clans (engines, structure/armor, and heatsinks). Until they do that theres always going to be serious balance problems.

Edited by Khobai, 19 February 2019 - 01:12 AM.


#13 Aidan Crenshaw

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Mercenary
  • The Mercenary
  • 3,648 posts

Posted 19 February 2019 - 12:55 AM

pssst... who's gonna tell him? Posted Image

#14 Dogstar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 1,725 posts
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationLondon

Posted 19 February 2019 - 03:38 AM

Adding more HS slots is one way PGI could balance standard engines - but they won't becasue they don't understand balance

#15 Tarl Cabot

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Tai-sho
  • Tai-sho
  • 7,824 posts
  • LocationImperial City, Luthien - Draconis Combine

Posted 19 February 2019 - 04:16 AM

View PostKiran Yagami, on 18 February 2019 - 09:23 PM, said:


Yeah, peon IS pilot! How dare you wish for some semblance of parity!


That would mean allowing isXL survive the loss of a ST with the current cXL/LFE penalties and readjust those penalties to a slightly lower settings, with the LFE having the lowest settings. Posted Image

#16 ACH75

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Grizzly
  • The Grizzly
  • 251 posts

Posted 19 February 2019 - 05:26 AM

Adding just 2-3 sockets should be sufficent to free the needed crit slots...

Edited by ACH75, 19 February 2019 - 05:28 AM.


#17 process

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Star Colonel II
  • Star Colonel II
  • 1,667 posts

Posted 19 February 2019 - 06:58 AM

If IS weapons are truly too hot, I'd rather see across-the-board heat reduction. No need to tweak construction rules. An IS mech with 12-18 DHS should be comparable to a Clan mech with 18-26 DHS, give or take.

Edited by process, 19 February 2019 - 06:59 AM.


#18 R E X I OS

    Member

  • PipPip
  • 31 posts

Posted 19 February 2019 - 07:01 AM

View PostACH75, on 18 February 2019 - 09:10 PM, said:

IS DHS take a lot of space often preventing the use of Endo-Steel...

I think should be nice to have more engines dhs sockets


Switch to Clan and problem solved.

#19 Oberst Wilhelm Klink

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 85 posts

Posted 19 February 2019 - 07:17 AM

View PostACH75, on 18 February 2019 - 09:10 PM, said:

I think should be nice to have more engines dhs sockets

Nope

#20 R Valentine

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Heavy Lifter
  • Heavy Lifter
  • 1,744 posts

Posted 19 February 2019 - 07:28 AM

You guys can cry about how much you hate IS being competitive all you want, but this is how we get stupid changes like ST heat spike. So enjoy your reward.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users