

More Engine Dhs Sockets
#1
Posted 18 February 2019 - 09:10 PM
I think should be nice to have more engines dhs sockets
#2
Posted 18 February 2019 - 09:22 PM
#4
Posted 18 February 2019 - 09:30 PM
Edited by Mister Maf, 18 February 2019 - 09:31 PM.
#5
Posted 18 February 2019 - 09:56 PM
#6
Posted 18 February 2019 - 09:57 PM
#7
Posted 18 February 2019 - 10:47 PM
#8
Posted 18 February 2019 - 10:48 PM
#9
Posted 18 February 2019 - 11:00 PM

#10
Posted 18 February 2019 - 11:27 PM
#11
Posted 19 February 2019 - 12:42 AM
#12
Posted 19 February 2019 - 12:54 AM
Instead all IS DHS (both internal and external) should just be true double heatsinks. IS pay more for their DHS so their DHS should be better. Its that simple. Making all IS DHS true dubs would balance the fact they take up 3 crit slots instead of only 2 crit slots.
Also the issue of ISES/ISFF sucking compared to their clan versions needs to be addressed. Because thats another huge reason why IS mechs are starved on crit slots. Like ISDHS, if ISES/ISFF cost more then they also need to DO more.
And ISXL should survive side torso destruction (also LFE and STD should get buffed). because right now CXL is vastly superior to every other engine type. All the different engines need to be completely rebalanced to be brought into parity with eachother.
PGI really needs to balance the fundamental tech bases for IS and Clans (engines, structure/armor, and heatsinks). Until they do that theres always going to be serious balance problems.
Edited by Khobai, 19 February 2019 - 01:12 AM.
#13
Posted 19 February 2019 - 12:55 AM

#14
Posted 19 February 2019 - 03:38 AM
#15
Posted 19 February 2019 - 04:16 AM
Kiran Yagami, on 18 February 2019 - 09:23 PM, said:
Yeah, peon IS pilot! How dare you wish for some semblance of parity!
That would mean allowing isXL survive the loss of a ST with the current cXL/LFE penalties and readjust those penalties to a slightly lower settings, with the LFE having the lowest settings.

#16
Posted 19 February 2019 - 05:26 AM
Edited by ACH75, 19 February 2019 - 05:28 AM.
#17
Posted 19 February 2019 - 06:58 AM
Edited by process, 19 February 2019 - 06:59 AM.
#20
Posted 19 February 2019 - 07:28 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users