Dee Eight, on 04 November 2019 - 08:39 AM, said:
To expand on that, a lot of folks will go look at Jarl's as its a quick reference to the Quickplay leaderboard data going back to July 2016, but they'll only use the "overall" numbers usually when trying to disparage / attack someone on the forums. They'll conveniently choose to omit mentioning whether or not someone's play has shown consistent improvement for months, years, whatever. If you played 10,000 bad matches over a year, and then had 2,000 good matches over the following year, you're overall score is still being dragged down by those earlier 10,000 games. There's that expression "git gud" some love to throw out on comms / chat, but they never will admit when someone actually has. If someone has reached tier 1 and they have 16 consecutive months of killing enemies more often than dying and average match scores higher than their "overall" average, then they probably deserve to be there a lot more than someone who's never shown any signs of improvement and who've been playing the game far more often.
An entire paragraph that is, rather clearly, waffling about yourself.
Trying to justify "why" you should be Tier 1. Despite the fact your performance is only
just above Tier 3, if PSR actually worked.
And that is the thing - it is all about interpreting the data given. You have shown time and time again that you are unable to understand basic metrics within MWO.
Also the
KEY FACTOR YOU ARE IGNORING (of course, cause it suits your narative) -
Skilled Player Exodus. The mass exodus of skilled players in the past 18 months is the only reason players such as you are increasing in AvgMS. If they were still in the game they would be punishing you left/right & centre. And this your Avg MS would not improve at all because bad play would ensure you get REKT.
That's quite literally the state of the MM in the past 18 months. If you think you have improved, marginally at best, when all the good players have left. That is LOL worthy level delusion.