

Question About Tier And Quick Play
#1
Posted 20 November 2019 - 09:59 PM
#2
Posted 20 November 2019 - 10:15 PM
Anyone who is not the pinnacle of Terribad will eventually reach Tier 1
Even those sub 40% on the Jarls list, average performance being quite poor, will climb to the "top"
#3
Posted 20 November 2019 - 10:22 PM
#5
Posted 20 November 2019 - 10:41 PM
Second - there is no such thing, as Tier 1 now. Population of players is so small in this game, that all flood gates are just constantly open, except may be some holiday event.
Third - PSR is lie. It doesn't tell anything about real player skill, as it's way too biased towards increasing. For example I'm in Tier 2, while with my stats I should have been in Tier 4, Tier 3 at best.
#6
Posted 20 November 2019 - 10:50 PM
MrMadguy, on 20 November 2019 - 10:41 PM, said:
Third - PSR is lie. It doesn't tell anything about real player skill, as it's way too biased towards increasing. For example I'm in Tier 2, while with my stats I should have been in Tier 4, Tier 3 at best.
Second - is incorrect. The floodgates are not open. You drop in a 3-Tier range. Being T2 you can drop in 2 to 4 or 1 to 3, but not with T5.
Third - is correct. PSR is just an experience bar, nothing more. If you can stomach enough bad rounds, being bad, you still advance in Tier. You have to play really bad to stay in one tier.
Nosferatu, check this post for the active regulations of the matchmaker https://mwomercs.com...pdate-30052018/
#8
Posted 21 November 2019 - 01:49 AM
BlaizerP, on 20 November 2019 - 10:29 PM, said:
#9
Posted 21 November 2019 - 02:00 AM
there is a very large lag that happens.. IDK why or how.. but its more useful to your team if "when your viewing" you use that time to Identify targets and help your team mates id weak points..
so if target bravo left torso is Ez one touch and hes running a Xl because you did the calculations quickly.. you can say
"target bravo visual right torso ez one touch"
"golf Rear ct ready to pop"
"echo moving south thru golf eight"
then again.. i hear you guys say things like target baker, and taker dilly....
even with language barriers... Alfa, Bravo, Charlie, Delta, Echo, Foxtrot, Golf, Hotel, India, Juliet, Kilo, Lima, Mike, November, Oscar, Papa, Quebec, Romeo, Sierra, Tango, Uniform, Victor, Whiskey, X-ray, Yankee
is world wide, we dont have to speak the same language to speak this language
So.... keep waiting till the match is over to talk

#10
Posted 21 November 2019 - 02:13 AM
Prototelis, on 20 November 2019 - 10:50 PM, said:
There is still a two tier differential. I tested this recently while ASH was doing his Tier 3 in 3 matches.
Correct. Granted my sample space was only a handful of games it's not entirely fool proof...
However...
When you play in Oceanic as I do and a game takes 10mins to find a match each time - if the gates were open it would be putting all the guys watching my stream (~60 or do when I did it) in games with me.
Which it did not. It was not until I was Tier 3 that I started to see familiar names, all of them are definitely Tier 1. Some guys were even on T4/T3 smurfs just to match against me after I had been searching for 10mins to try and kick start a match.
So the gates are absolutely still working, I believe, as outlined HERE. PSR is broken however and I pointed it out in that very thread HERE. Fast Forward 18 months and the Qs and game quality has become so bad that many players I know simply refuse to play QP anymore, or at best play limited.
I mean just myself I've gone from 250-350 matches a month to around 30. It just isn't worth waiting 10mins for a match in QP for it to end in 3mins with 3-6 players failing to break 100dmg because they have no place being above Tier 4 and them having made their way into Tier 1 is just absurd.
#11
Posted 21 November 2019 - 02:46 AM
justcallme A S H, on 21 November 2019 - 02:13 AM, said:
I mean just myself I've gone from 250-350 matches a month to around 30. It just isn't worth waiting 10mins for a match in QP for it to end in 3mins with 3-6 players failing to break 100dmg because they have no place being above Tier 4 and them having made their way into Tier 1 is just absurd.
^^^this^^^
and also: NASCAR.
#12
Posted 21 November 2019 - 05:02 AM
MrMadguy, on 20 November 2019 - 10:41 PM, said:
Don't be so hard on yourself, you're a solid Tier 3, possibly a low-end 2.
There's an artificial raising of stats for the true Tier 1/top players as they have ample opportunity to farm potatoes who they shouldn't be matched with in the first place.
By reflection there's lower skilled players that should have higher stats because they're consistently matched against players beyond their pay grade.
#13
Posted 21 November 2019 - 05:07 AM
#14
Posted 21 November 2019 - 05:44 AM
#15
Posted 21 November 2019 - 05:49 AM

#16
Posted 21 November 2019 - 06:28 AM
Unfortunately, you're just going to have to get used to having these sorts of players on your team. It's not going to get significantly better when you get to T1 and the matchmaker will expect you to carry more weight. Just work on doing what you can to improve yourself and let your teammates do their thing, for better or for worse.
VonBruinwald, on 21 November 2019 - 05:02 AM, said:
There's an artificial raising of stats for the true Tier 1/top players as they have ample opportunity to farm potatoes who they shouldn't be matched with in the first place.
By reflection there's lower skilled players that should have higher stats because they're consistently matched against players beyond their pay grade.
I disagree with this analysis. The most accurate stats would be if no matchmaking existed and all players played all others. In that case the best players would have the best stats and the worst players would have the worst stats. This would accurately reflect their ability relative to the whole community and is close to what we have with T1 now.
On the flip side, if the matchmaker was nearly perfect you would expect everyone's stats to approach a WLR of ~1 since they would always be playing against similarly skilled players. In that case having a WLR of 1.0 becomes meaningless and what's important is the tier/ranking that player has.
You can't directly compare stats unless the players are in the same tier, since it's easier to get higher stats in the lower tiers by playing against weaker players. I take issue with the word "artificial", if a player is consistently being matched against players that are better than them it means that they probably aren't that strong of a player, if they are consistently matched against worse players they are probably a stronger player. Working tiers artificially lower the stats of true top players (by artificially matching them against each other) and elevate the stats of weaker players (by shielding them from better players).
There's nothing wrong with that (in fact it makes the game better for everyone involved), but completely random matchmaking provides the most accurate stats and matchmaking introduces "artificial" stats, not the other way around.
I agree with MrMadguy's analysis, based on his stats, in a properly distributed system he should probably be T4-T3. You should probably be upper T3 to low T2 (though your stats might be biased slightly higher if you aren't in T1), Horseman probably similarly depending on the metrics used (MS upper T2, WLR mid T3).
#17
Posted 21 November 2019 - 10:20 AM
Xiphias, on 21 November 2019 - 06:28 AM, said:
Considering I regularly put up 1000+ damage matches I would have to disagree with your assessment, I have so many matches because I have been playing a long time, I do **** off a lot like play troll mechs for fun but any person who knows me knows I am skilled beyond tier 2 but you have a right to your opinion no matter how inaccurate it is lol
#18
Posted 21 November 2019 - 10:29 AM

so ya....disagree lol ^^^^^^, even with my trolling I am still well above 1:1 lmao
Edited by Nosferatu 666, 21 November 2019 - 10:29 AM.
#19
Posted 21 November 2019 - 10:44 AM
#20
Posted 21 November 2019 - 10:52 AM

go ahead, impress me


Edited by Nosferatu 666, 21 November 2019 - 10:52 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users