ambosen, on 08 March 2022 - 06:28 PM, said:
But yeah, the RAC-5's ultimately undone just by essentially having to many viable competitors with multiple desireable properties.
i disagree on that, non of the weaponsystems have the capability of continueous firesupport that a rac 5 offers .. the rac 5 imho is a good pick for when you want to provide firesupport with medium mechs were you otherwise lack the tonnage and space for boating AC 2s/5s .. it offers a better DPS for lower tonnage in that case ...
otherwise on heavies the RAC 5 is (at least for me) a nice tool for brawling with putting continiuous screenshake on the opponent ..
i use a dual RAC5 roughneck and when i get the opportunity i go out and melt fools with its firebarage i don´t see me getting with a compareable UAC or Standart AC build .. otherwise go and couple Racs with uacs on an Assault ... i have tried an annihilator with 2 uac 10 and 2 RAC 5s ... this thing DELETES (needs to shave of some armor though) ..... otherwise if you want range then 3 Rac 2 and dual UAC 5s ... i love it, it´s fun ...
any ballistic option has a drawback of some kind
LBX splash (no enemy screenshake on hit) and depending on the ammount of cannons not a continiuous bulletstream
Standart AC primarily the cooldown between shots that you have a less continious stream of bullets like with LBXs
UAC´s ... within those 15 seconds the avarage player will Jam its weapons significantly many more times than with racs ...
Edited by MrTBSC, 12 March 2022 - 09:33 AM.