73 replies to this topic

[Staude Coston]

HYPER ASSAULT GAUSS RIFLE 20:
<p style="font-size: medium;">

• Reduced Heat to 6.25 (from 7.0)

HYPER ASSAULT GAUSS RIFLE 30:
<p style="font-size: medium;">

• Reduced Heat to 11.5 (from 13)

HYPER ASSAULT GAUSS RIFLE 40:

• Reduced Heat to 12.5 (from

HYPER ASSAULT GAUSS
no clan player takes this weapon because it's just ********
point damage
Loading time heat
It's starting to get ridiculous

[Steel Shanks]

Rhaelcan, on 17 February 2024 - 06:07 PM, said:

People complain a lot on the forums. It is funny

People complained because it was Moronic... Hence it's changed back...

It's the Red Reaper II, not the beloved Red Reaper of BattleTech Canon... No, this one is... Different... It's Gods awful terrible, with an arse load of SRM Launchers for... Reasons? I guess... With a terrible Skin... Sad... I'd rather see the original.

Can't wait to see some LRM boat Red Reaper II's out there... LOL.

This gam...

[DarkISI]

Steel Shanks, on 17 February 2024 - 08:26 PM, said:

the beloved Red Reaper of BattleTech Canon...

Thank you
I did my best.

[crazytimes]

Steel Shanks, on 17 February 2024 - 08:26 PM, said:

It's the Red Reaper II, not the beloved Red Reaper of BattleTech Canon... No, this one is... Different... It's Gods awful terrible, with an arse load of SRM Launchers for... Reasons? I guess...

Yeah it's almost like 1990s tabletop turned based game and fluff lore don't trranslate well to 2024 first person real time shooter gameplay and things have to get changed so as to not be absolutely terrible.

But "mUh lOrE!!11" right?

[Void Angel]

First, I've seen several HAGs today alone, much less since the patch. Second, why are you crying bitter tears about the weapon being buffed if you think it's "*****?"

[DarkISI]

Given I am the one who wrote the stats and lore for the original Red Reaper, I am totally fine with PGI making changes for the sake of their game. They are also nice enough to call it Red Reaper II and do not pretend it would be the original. Good move on their part

Edited by DarkISI, 18 February 2024 - 01:00 AM.

[torsie]

I upgraded to 6 lasers, I hope that smaller heat from Gauss 30 will help with not exploding that much.

[Viltor]

[color=#CCCCCC]
LRM 5/10/15/20 (Standard and Artemis - Clan and IS)[/color]
[color=#CCCCCC]

• Max trajectory arc in indirect fire mode is increased to 150 meters (from 100m)*

*Note: This is a revert of the change made in January patch[/color]


Our pleads have been heard.

[Amsro]

Bud Crue, on 17 February 2024 - 07:11 AM, said:

Welp, ya got me opening the wallet again for the Red Reaper. Well done. Now do a Highlander that can somehow carry a Heavy Gauss in one arm and a shield in the other (seriously, that's it; just a Heavy Gauss and a shield and not much else other than maybe some mobility quirks) and I'll buy that too.

Oh...and the quirk changes to King Crabs and Oxide are a nice touch as well.

I would love a highlander with a Shield and Heavy Gauss. Perhaps something like this;

Legendary Highlander

XL400

Max Armor 558 + Shield 183 (123 and 150 for the Medium and Heavy.)

RT - ECM - 1M

RA - Heavy Gauss - 1B

RL - 2x Heavy Gauss Ammo

LT - 3x Jump Jet

LA - Shield

LL - 2x Heavy Gauss Ammo

CT - 2 ERML - 2E

Head - 1 ERML - 1E

Edited by Amsro, 18 February 2024 - 10:15 AM.

[Tiy0s]

DarkISI, on 17 February 2024 - 11:51 PM, said:

Given I am the one who wrote the stats and lore for the original Red Reaper, I am totally fine with PGI making changes for the sake of their game. They are also nice enough to call it Red Reaper II and do not pretend it would be the original. Good move on their part

Are you actually the original designer? I did not know! Awesome.

It’s a shame we had to redo it, but the lack of melee in MWO hurt it too much. Gotta make up for it with more guns!

[Amsro]

Tiy0s, on 18 February 2024 - 12:40 PM, said:

Are you actually the original designer? I did not know! Awesome.

It’s a shame we had to redo it, but the lack of melee in MWO hurt it too much. Gotta make up for it with more guns!

I think 5x Medium X-Pulse and a Couple Heavy PPC's would have been fine. I'll still have great fun with the Missiles, probably 4x MRM10's on the New variant though.


It would be amazing if you could manage to implement the MW5 Melee in MWO. I'm sure there have been talks, any specific reason it can't be done? (I've been away for too long if the reason has been discussed before)

[DarkISI]

Tiy0s, on 18 February 2024 - 12:40 PM, said:

Are you actually the original designer? I did not know! Awesome.

It’s a shame we had to redo it, but the lack of melee in MWO hurt it too much. Gotta make up for it with more guns!

Yep, Daniel Isberner. That would be me. Catalyst writer and the one who wrote XTRO Most Wanted and designed all units in it. Only the artwork isn't me, since my kids draw better than me.

[Rhaelcan]

Steel Shanks, on 17 February 2024 - 08:26 PM, said:

People complained because it was Moronic... Hence it's changed back...

It's the Red Reaper II, not the beloved Red Reaper of BattleTech Canon... No, this one is... Different... It's Gods awful terrible, with an arse load of SRM Launchers for... Reasons? I guess... With a terrible Skin... Sad... I'd rather see the original.

Can't wait to see some LRM boat Red Reaper II's out there... LOL.

This gam...

The original wouldn't have fit mwo, cause 1, no melee in mwo. 2, only 6 energy to work with.

[Rhaelcan]

DarkISI, on 18 February 2024 - 01:13 PM, said:

Yep, Daniel Isberner. That would be me. Catalyst writer and the one who wrote XTRO Most Wanted and designed all units in it. Only the artwork isn't me, since my kids draw better than me.

I'm sure if you wanted to play it tiyos could hook you up with a free one

[DarkISI]

Rhaelcan, on 18 February 2024 - 02:01 PM, said:

I'm sure if you wanted to play it tiyos could hook you up with a free one

I would definitely not say no to that.

[Tiy0s]

Rhaelcan, on 18 February 2024 - 02:01 PM, said:

I'm sure if you wanted to play it tiyos could hook you up with a free one

Don't put words in my mouth, Haru!

DarkISI, on 18 February 2024 - 02:06 PM, said:

I would definitely not say no to that.

But yes, I will hook you up with one

[DarkISI]

Tiy0s, on 18 February 2024 - 02:18 PM, said:

Don't put words in my mouth, Haru!


But yes, I will hook you up with one

[BlueDevilspawn]

Viltor, on 18 February 2024 - 08:38 AM, said:

[color=#CCCCCC]
LRM 5/10/15/20 (Standard and Artemis - Clan and IS)[/color]
[color=#CCCCCC]

• Max trajectory arc in indirect fire mode is increased to 150 meters (from 100m)*

*Note: This is a revert of the change made in January patch[/color]


Our pleads have been heard.

I wouldn’t say that’s the reason. The spaghetti code made the max height lower and it also made the launch angle shallower when that wasn’t the intent. Then intended stats were never properly tested due to this. Will need to adjust another way.

[nopempele]

Just wanted to say thank you for reverting the LRM nerf. That must have required some courage to admit that you were wrong about it.

Just don't listen to everything that your "Cauldron" club has to say as they are very much biased towards their preferred way of playing.

[Case18]

With the new weapons coming in March, will there be some news or specs released on them in the coming weeks?