Hawk819, on 17 September 2025 - 09:36 PM, said:
Truth be told, I'm not jumping for joy for this variant, I would much rather have the Gauss Variant or LB-x AC/10 variant. Either of those would've been a better choice. Like usual, they read Ballistic Torso and wham! We've got MG monster!
MG monster? Why would you run MG's on that. Plus, it adds something new to the chassis instead of copy and paste laser vomit.
Steel Raven, on 18 September 2025 - 12:26 AM, said:
...The Sleipnir has Ballistic Torso Mounts. The Black Widow has Ballistic Torso Mounts. The War Emu, Torso Ballistic Mounts.The BLR-6C canonically has 4X Light AC 5, you can easily swap those out for Dual Gauss, Dual Heavy Gauss, Triple or Quad LB-10X, Duel LB-20X, Duel RAC-5, Triple Rac-2. The only way PGI could screw this up is by ether giving it terrible quirks or ignoring the art the BLR-6C was based on and somehow place the ballistics at crotch level like the current arm mounts.
Yeah, I take back what I posted earlier. Without re-scaling,10 tons less armor and guns, it's going to live or die on quirks.
It's going to be laser mount high. That's the whole reason for it coming, and I doubt Tiyos would **** it up.
Ttly, on 17 September 2025 - 09:16 PM, said:
What, you think having below 10DPS/30ish alpha to be fine because at least it has access to stealth armor which is its only selling point above the WLF-C (which has 50ish alpha thanks to HLL+cERML) since it has no weapon quirks other than heat?
And the new Raven just gets to have more hardpoints, and slightly better hitbox/weapon placement. And if it takes after the 3L, effectively more hitpoints than the Grinner too because structure (which it gets instead of armor quirk) skill nodes are +33% at 10 nodes.
Probably going to have a lot less quirks compared to the Grinner, like no laser heat, and only structure. Think of it as a side grade.