Honor Among Thieves (Signup)
#601
Posted 10 August 2012 - 06:27 PM
#602
Posted 10 August 2012 - 06:37 PM
guardian wolf, on 09 August 2012 - 05:53 PM, said:
I think Thom was saying that, were he in the position of a seller, he wouldn't sell it for less than 30,000, and thereby raising questions about whether Chris would have ever accepted 3,000. I figure that 3,000 will buy you a lot of cans of beans, and that when you are desperate, you might care a lot less about what you could potentially get for a non-edible laser system, and how many cans of beans that guy there is offering you right now.
#603
Posted 10 August 2012 - 06:42 PM
#604
Posted 10 August 2012 - 06:58 PM
RogueSpear, on 10 August 2012 - 06:27 PM, said:
Nope. Nik had one from when he stole that RVN-3L Raven from the MAC, but I fluffed it as being damaged (along with the BAP) during his escape, considering he's not going to use either one. It also allowed him to keep the IS on the Chameleon standard.
#605
Posted 10 August 2012 - 08:20 PM
Edit: I hope there's still room for me.
Edited by Rasengetsu, 10 August 2012 - 09:10 PM.
#606
Posted 11 August 2012 - 11:15 AM
#607
Posted 11 August 2012 - 02:57 PM
#608
Posted 11 August 2012 - 03:02 PM
#609
Posted 12 August 2012 - 08:54 AM
#610
Posted 12 August 2012 - 09:06 AM
#611
Posted 12 August 2012 - 10:15 AM
Seriously though, I was gone for like 5 days and the RP is still at the same spot, but the first few days when we started we got 3 pages xD
#612
Posted 12 August 2012 - 10:23 AM
#613
Posted 12 August 2012 - 11:08 AM
Edited by Rasengetsu, 12 August 2012 - 12:25 PM.
#614
Posted 12 August 2012 - 11:53 AM
#615
Posted 13 August 2012 - 09:28 AM
The briefing kinda went on longer than I was expecting; it's because people were asking good questions and giving good suggestions though, so that's okay. At any rate, I think I'd like to fast-forward to the drop just to expedite things; if there are no objections to that, the post'll go up tomorrow!
Edited by Xinaoen, 13 August 2012 - 09:28 AM.
#616
Posted 13 August 2012 - 05:12 PM
#617
Posted 13 August 2012 - 06:06 PM
Edited by Rasengetsu, 13 August 2012 - 06:08 PM.
#618
Posted 13 August 2012 - 07:09 PM
Thom Frankfurt, on 13 August 2012 - 05:12 PM, said:
That's for sure. Normally I don't have any presupposed outcomes in mind; I have a scenario crafted, but how the players want to approach it is up to them. I'd rather watch them come up with their own solution than watch them trying to figure out the solution that I had in mind. That leads to a lot of games where I have no idea what the players are going to do, and I'm just improvising moment-to-moment.
That kind of an open-ended approach is really hard to manage with this many players, though; it gets messy if you have a dozen different people each trying to do their own thing. At that point, I prefer a scenario like this one - the players can put their own touches on it, but it's more "here's the plan" than "what's the plan?"
That way I can be the one throwing the monkey wrenches. Heh.
#619
Posted 13 August 2012 - 10:13 PM
#620
Posted 14 August 2012 - 04:21 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users