


Warhammer Rebuild
#101
Posted 11 October 2012 - 01:42 AM

#102
Posted 11 October 2012 - 03:31 AM
#105
Posted 05 November 2012 - 01:48 PM
#107
Posted 05 November 2012 - 10:19 PM
Paul BlackJack Cady, on 05 November 2012 - 02:04 PM, said:
I thought the whole lens was the large laser and the little black dot might have been the small targeting laser for the cannon..
my bad.
It's an optical distortion when I rendered the model. The gun tube is hollow with the back end painted black for effect. It shows up as a little dot in the lens.
#108
Posted 06 November 2012 - 02:41 PM
#109
Posted 13 February 2013 - 09:20 AM
At first I thought the legs are a bit too "beefy" for the rest of the 'Mech, but actually it makes a lot of sense for a 'Mech to have sturdy legs

Can't wait to see your Rifleman

#110
Posted 13 February 2013 - 12:48 PM
Speechless...
#111
Posted 13 February 2013 - 01:08 PM
Piranha, on 13 February 2013 - 09:20 AM, said:
At first I thought the legs are a bit too "beefy" for the rest of the 'Mech, but actually it makes a lot of sense for a 'Mech to have sturdy legs

Can't wait to see your Rifleman

You don't have to wait long. The Rifleman
Bam MacGonzo, on 13 February 2013 - 12:48 PM, said:
Speechless...
Sometimes the fewest words have the most meaning.
#112
Posted 13 February 2013 - 01:55 PM


On a side note I think I read a few descriptions of SRM launchers that describe them 60mm and at least one make that fires 90mm missiles.
#113
Posted 13 February 2013 - 02:20 PM

#114
Posted 13 February 2013 - 03:10 PM
Fury9er, on 13 February 2013 - 01:55 PM, said:


On a side note I think I read a few descriptions of SRM launchers that describe them 60mm and at least one make that fires 90mm missiles.
When I lived in Vegas and would regularly go to the Virtual World center in the mid-90s, they had mockup weapons and ammo on display in the lobby. On one display were different SRM missiles. They were a bit large in comparison to the LRM if shorter in length.
Snaloe, on 13 February 2013 - 02:20 PM, said:

Thanks!
#115
Posted 13 February 2013 - 07:27 PM
#118
Posted 14 February 2013 - 10:58 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 13 February 2013 - 07:32 PM, said:
ShadowHammer, on 14 February 2013 - 07:21 PM, said:
Well whoops! That measn I left the same mistake on one of the other threads lol.
There's a reason I have a quote in my sig! LOL
#119
Posted 15 February 2013 - 08:35 AM
HanaYuriko, on 05 November 2012 - 10:19 PM, said:
Well why not? A LL is defined by it´s destructive power.. you can very well get that with a small beam diameter

#120
Posted 16 February 2013 - 07:34 AM
15 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 15 guests, 0 anonymous users