Third person views.
#61
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:58 AM
#62
Posted 31 July 2012 - 11:24 AM
Lights are scouting in MWO. Thats their designated role. For example it enables a Catapult to hail down LRMs from afar, for gods sake. My take is that weapons range and detection range will be a major contribution to battlefield dynamics.
Yes, external view gives an advantage to peekig around corners. But at least it gives this advantage consistently to EVERYBODY. It may help the jumpsniper behind his hill, but it also helps the brawler peeking around the corner before running in the open. And it certainly helps lights to maneuver difficult terrain (citys) at high speed whilst focusing a target (not so easy), so same difference really.
That being said it won't be implemented for a long time an most certainly nerver make it into the game.
#63
Posted 31 July 2012 - 11:35 AM
Edited by Okami Ryu, 31 July 2012 - 11:51 AM.
#64
Posted 31 July 2012 - 11:39 AM
At least we got reconissance drones, if you can belive that video with the Whammy.
Edited by MrDred, 31 July 2012 - 11:39 AM.
#66
Posted 31 July 2012 - 11:40 AM
#67
Posted 31 July 2012 - 11:47 AM
light487, on 30 July 2012 - 08:26 PM, said:
http://mwomercs.com/...post__p__587016
As I've posted elsewhere, I agree to a certain extent that it feels claustrophic and a bit limiting... but that's kind of the point..
I love it when developers stick to a vision rather than just try to please everyone. It always makes for great games. Personally I hope move more toward simulation and away from the arcade style of World of Tanks. Prohibiting 3rd person view is a big step in that direction.
#68
Posted 31 July 2012 - 11:48 AM
Being in a first person perspective also means you won't be able to see your back, meaning you'll have to develop awareness skills, which is to me a definite in a skill-based game. I'd never even consider MWO if it had the option to use 3rd person views.
#69
Posted 31 July 2012 - 11:52 AM
OdLaW187, on 30 July 2012 - 07:17 PM, said:
For. The. Hundredth. Time. NO!
No.
Niet.
Non.
Nein.
Nao.
Nee.
Mhai.
Ei.
Ingeno.
#70
Posted 31 July 2012 - 12:01 PM
Xyos212, on 31 July 2012 - 10:55 AM, said:
2. I'd rather have a working game that gets more money in the long run than a broken & stale experience that runs out of money in the first four months.
#71
Posted 31 July 2012 - 12:05 PM
LordDeathStrike, on 30 July 2012 - 08:27 PM, said:
this game is a mech sim for battle tech fans.
leave the game alone, it is what it is, and nobody wants a third person shooter (that matters).
WOW! Really, just because not everyone wants the same thing you do they automatically don't matter in the scheme of things? OH wait it's that founders thing again, has to be. Personally, I given the choice between 1st and 3rd person view I would take 1st, but to say I don't matter just because I want a different player view, that's wrong on many levels. Sorry to offend you oh wise and powerful one that matters!
#72
Posted 31 July 2012 - 12:10 PM
Kristarian, on 31 July 2012 - 12:05 PM, said:
WOW! Really, just because not everyone wants the same thing you do they automatically don't matter in the scheme of things? OH wait it's that founders thing again, has to be. Personally, I given the choice between 1st and 3rd person view I would take 1st, but to say I don't matter just because I want a different player view, that's wrong on many levels. Sorry to offend you oh wise and powerful one that matters!
Believe us, you do NOT want 3rd person for this game.
#73
Posted 31 July 2012 - 12:35 PM
Quote
#74
Posted 31 July 2012 - 12:35 PM
#75
Posted 31 July 2012 - 12:52 PM
Aside from that, no third person for me please, except in spectator mode.
Edited by Ghost0r, 31 July 2012 - 12:53 PM.
#76
Posted 31 July 2012 - 01:07 PM
#77
Posted 31 July 2012 - 01:30 PM
Mom I want ice cream
no
mom I'd really like some ice cream
no
mom I'm so hot ice cream would really be good now
no
mom cant I have just alittle bit of ice cream pleazzzzzzzzz
no
if I clean up my bedroom can I have some
I'll think about it
and so it goes tell mom just to shut her brat up lets him have some. Unfortunatly the kids takes this into adulthood to where we see these continued posts about the same thing reworded.
In old days you asked for something once if denied that was it...
Dad can I have icecream
no
Dad can I have some icecream plz
what did I say?
but ,but...
time for you to get your chores done, the lawn needs to be mowed, and theres some weeds to be pulled out in the garden, is your room cleaned up bed made"? here is some windex and paper towels I want you to clean all the windows.....
so we have the wishy washy parents who spoiled their kids to thank for multiple posts of same thing- 3d person view, in game voip so on. The "if we whine about it enough we will get our way" philosophy.
#78
Posted 31 July 2012 - 01:32 PM
#79
Posted 31 July 2012 - 01:35 PM
Evilhomer777, on 31 July 2012 - 01:32 PM, said:
Or better yet, let the people creating the game decide. Which they have.
Seriously, this dead horse has been flogged so terribly it no longer resembles a horse.
The game developer has said: No. Not going to happen.
http://mwomercs.com/...016#entry587016
Edited by Lin Shai, 31 July 2012 - 01:36 PM.
#80
Posted 31 July 2012 - 01:50 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
This topic is locked




















