PNT-9K Panther fan concept
#21
Posted 08 February 2012 - 09:34 AM
#22
Posted 08 February 2012 - 09:37 AM
#23
Posted 08 February 2012 - 09:41 AM
Bit of a ******* offspring of an ON1-K and a GHR-5R and something else judging buy the shoulder assembly and *face*
definitely needs more of a *feline* look to the face.
but still very well done.
#24
Posted 08 February 2012 - 09:49 AM
#25
Posted 08 February 2012 - 09:51 AM
They'd buy it, right?
#26
Posted 08 February 2012 - 10:09 AM
Garth Erlam, on 08 February 2012 - 09:51 AM, said:
They'd buy it, right?
Ever heard about SOPA? The guys in black will break into your house and sodomize you if you do.
EDIT: Forgot you have to be bothering the industry for that to happen... Go ahead then.
Edited by Caballo, 08 February 2012 - 10:13 AM.
#27
Posted 08 February 2012 - 10:16 AM
#28
Posted 08 February 2012 - 10:19 AM
#29
Posted 08 February 2012 - 10:26 AM
Garth Erlam, on 08 February 2012 - 09:51 AM, said:
They'd buy it, right?
Nah,... FD would say you phtoshopped some of his mechs together and Paul would... let's not get into detail. Of course everyone else would be 100% sure you are not that good artsist. No offense.
But if you can't use this, at least tell FD that this is what a good Panther should look like and that he should do his work on this, instead of that piece of ugly junk in the TRO drawings.
Edited by Adridos, 08 February 2012 - 10:27 AM.
#30
Posted 08 February 2012 - 10:28 AM
#31
Posted 08 February 2012 - 01:40 PM
#32
Posted 08 February 2012 - 03:02 PM
boooo fists!
</sarcasm>
loving it, excellent rendition - maybe just trim the shoulders a little but everything else is
spot on
#33
Posted 08 February 2012 - 03:33 PM
In retrospect, yeah the head is looking increasingly derpy to me and the shoulders are a bit big - would hate to catch an AC hit on one of them. On the plus side I bet the thing is stick thin approaching the the side view.
#34
Posted 08 February 2012 - 03:52 PM
#35
Posted 08 February 2012 - 04:13 PM
ED: Again, too much torso, not enough head. But great job with the style!
Edited by Hayden, 08 February 2012 - 04:14 PM.
#36
Posted 08 February 2012 - 04:55 PM
ethnic minority, on 08 February 2012 - 01:50 AM, said:
Figured it might be easier if a head to head camparison was done..
So with that said..
I can see the camparison really well.. and like FD you sunk the head into the torso (Which BTW I am good with).
Seems the only major deviatons you incorporated other than sinking the head into the chest was the "waist" so it could really "do the twist" (Wich again I am really good with.. ) and relocation of the SRM4 (which I think could have been where it was.. so don't understand that change.. but its minor)
On a scale of 1-100 I give it a 92 really really good.. Do think it needs its "Face".. specifically the mouth.
Edited by Chuckie, 08 February 2012 - 05:01 PM.
#37
Posted 08 February 2012 - 05:00 PM
#38
Posted 08 February 2012 - 05:14 PM
#39
Posted 08 February 2012 - 05:21 PM
#40
Posted 08 February 2012 - 09:13 PM
Some constructive (I hope) critisism though, the left arm looks like it would be further away from the body if you were looking strait on rather than at an angle. I feel there is too much torso going on also, I thought it was a Battle Cobra at first glance.
But very well done, all the same!
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users