data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3ae9/b3ae9cf8cfed3e06df6984fcf2a08c460eab065d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a803/7a8032f867d66c5ea2d067f61e0d5b3fb4b18710" alt=""
PNT-9K Panther fan concept
#21
Posted 08 February 2012 - 09:34 AM
#22
Posted 08 February 2012 - 09:37 AM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7327/d7327050b9d7eaff92a293f6318de9fdcce6a4fc" alt=":)"
#23
Posted 08 February 2012 - 09:41 AM
Bit of a ******* offspring of an ON1-K and a GHR-5R and something else judging buy the shoulder assembly and *face*
definitely needs more of a *feline* look to the face.
but still very well done.
#24
Posted 08 February 2012 - 09:49 AM
#25
Posted 08 February 2012 - 09:51 AM
They'd buy it, right?
#26
Posted 08 February 2012 - 10:09 AM
Garth Erlam, on 08 February 2012 - 09:51 AM, said:
They'd buy it, right?
Ever heard about SOPA?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2be9/c2be9ba84b0aee57ef37db8584e1cab477350ae1" alt=":)"
EDIT: Forgot you have to be bothering the industry for that to happen... Go ahead then.
Edited by Caballo, 08 February 2012 - 10:13 AM.
#27
Posted 08 February 2012 - 10:16 AM
#28
Posted 08 February 2012 - 10:19 AM
#29
Posted 08 February 2012 - 10:26 AM
Garth Erlam, on 08 February 2012 - 09:51 AM, said:
They'd buy it, right?
Nah,... FD would say you phtoshopped some of his mechs together and Paul would... let's not get into detail. Of course everyone else would be 100% sure you are not that good artsist. No offense.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cac15/cac156271fb851310d70508668758f79fa3f0ec6" alt=":o"
But if you can't use this, at least tell FD that this is what a good Panther should look like and that he should do his work on this, instead of that piece of ugly junk in the TRO drawings.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7327/d7327050b9d7eaff92a293f6318de9fdcce6a4fc" alt=":)"
Edited by Adridos, 08 February 2012 - 10:27 AM.
#30
Posted 08 February 2012 - 10:28 AM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7327/d7327050b9d7eaff92a293f6318de9fdcce6a4fc" alt=":)"
#31
Posted 08 February 2012 - 01:40 PM
#32
Posted 08 February 2012 - 03:02 PM
boooo fists!
</sarcasm>
loving it, excellent rendition - maybe just trim the shoulders a little but everything else is
spot on
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8354/f8354f67d396600a43059baa17eee0be5011e8c2" alt=":)"
#33
Posted 08 February 2012 - 03:33 PM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7327/d7327050b9d7eaff92a293f6318de9fdcce6a4fc" alt=":)"
In retrospect, yeah the head is looking increasingly derpy to me and the shoulders are a bit big - would hate to catch an AC hit on one of them. On the plus side I bet the thing is stick thin approaching the the side view.
#34
Posted 08 February 2012 - 03:52 PM
#35
Posted 08 February 2012 - 04:13 PM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8354/f8354f67d396600a43059baa17eee0be5011e8c2" alt=":)"
ED: Again, too much torso, not enough head. But great job with the style!
Edited by Hayden, 08 February 2012 - 04:14 PM.
#36
Posted 08 February 2012 - 04:55 PM
ethnic minority, on 08 February 2012 - 01:50 AM, said:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d410/8d410c9076cf341ee417914f926ba1ddbec02646" alt="Posted Image"
Figured it might be easier if a head to head camparison was done..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c70f/8c70f68c966cfb9b10da8c1eec7d66514b97c08e" alt="Posted Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03e00/03e0067976d85b48ca1f1bb5abf4feafe6079bae" alt="Posted Image"
So with that said..
I can see the camparison really well.. and like FD you sunk the head into the torso (Which BTW I am good with).
Seems the only major deviatons you incorporated other than sinking the head into the chest was the "waist" so it could really "do the twist" (Wich again I am really good with.. ) and relocation of the SRM4 (which I think could have been where it was.. so don't understand that change.. but its minor)
On a scale of 1-100 I give it a 92 really really good.. Do think it needs its "Face".. specifically the mouth.
Edited by Chuckie, 08 February 2012 - 05:01 PM.
#37
Posted 08 February 2012 - 05:00 PM
#38
Posted 08 February 2012 - 05:14 PM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7327/d7327050b9d7eaff92a293f6318de9fdcce6a4fc" alt=":)"
#39
Posted 08 February 2012 - 05:21 PM
#40
Posted 08 February 2012 - 09:13 PM
Some constructive (I hope) critisism though, the left arm looks like it would be further away from the body if you were looking strait on rather than at an angle. I feel there is too much torso going on also, I thought it was a Battle Cobra at first glance.
But very well done, all the same!
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users