Illydth, on 13 September 2012 - 01:37 PM, said:
Very well... That "special tag" (founders tag) does not mean "I'm better than you are because I have this tag and you don't". It means "I did something for this game as well as for other players". Tag does not segregate population, only in some minds.
I really do NOT think that the extend founders twice just because they are selling well is right - it's kind of unfair for those who bought founders in "first wave".
Illydth, on 13 September 2012 - 01:37 PM, said:
Its not about open or closed beta - its about that the sale of founders should end long time age, maybe only founder accounts upgrade could be still available.
Pup money to this game now is not a big risk, not anymore. There is enought video gameplay footage, screenshots (and yes there are NDA breaks as well) . Try to compare current situation with situation one or two months ago and you will see there is huge difference.
Illydth, on 13 September 2012 - 01:37 PM, said:
Yes I did, yes I did and yes I did. Did you?
Summary:
Devs sold the founders with the tags and other bonuses - there was this deal:
We put money to this game only becouse we believed in this game, and devs gave us those founders tags and other stuff as reward. But now - its not reward, not anymore. The founders are just common article.
Do you see the difference? Founders should be (and they were) reward for something (in this case for affiance), not just a commodity (becuase its not anymore about affiance as well there is no risk... "new" founders know exactly what are they buying).