BattleMech 16: Flea
#401
Posted 09 October 2012 - 05:24 PM
#402
Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:20 PM
#403
Posted 22 October 2012 - 02:07 PM
Edited by Rodney28021, 22 October 2012 - 02:09 PM.
#404
Posted 27 October 2012 - 04:55 PM
Omigir, on 26 September 2012 - 10:46 AM, said:
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
See, it wasn't a troll post. If not for this one Omigir couldn't play
#405
Posted 27 October 2012 - 08:26 PM
#406
Posted 31 October 2012 - 02:07 AM
#407
Posted 31 October 2012 - 05:00 PM
#409
Posted 04 November 2012 - 11:09 PM
#410
Posted 15 November 2012 - 06:04 PM
What does this bring that you can't already do with a jenner/commando/raven?
Absolutely nothing.
There are still so many mechs that can actually be put in that aren't just duplicates of existing mechs with different shells that should be coming instead.
#411
Posted 15 November 2012 - 08:05 PM
#412
Posted 16 November 2012 - 08:00 AM
#413
Posted 16 November 2012 - 08:12 AM
Farmer, on 15 November 2012 - 08:05 PM, said:
It does fill a tonnage gap, but the HIghlander does too...and it fills the lack of a JJ capable assault, there are more light/light medium mechs then assaults, it is probably the mech that more people want to play, and will keep people playing this game...more so then the Flea at least and that is why the Highlander should get priority...it helps the product more then the flea to be commercially viable.
#414
Posted 16 November 2012 - 10:34 AM
#415
Posted 16 November 2012 - 12:32 PM
Farmer, on 16 November 2012 - 10:34 AM, said:
Valid points, but 60% voted for the highlander first...closer to 70% if you give half the "i don't care" votes to each option. The people have spoken
#416
Posted 17 November 2012 - 05:05 AM
for its light weight (speed, turn, engine size to speed ratio)
for mounting light weapon systems (extra range, recharge/reload, heat bleeding)
be able to mount extra systems (ams, emc, command, radar...)
for training (count as 1 in 3 of any other tree)
for suffering a massive weight disadvantage
#417
Posted 17 November 2012 - 06:45 AM
**giggety**
#418
Posted 18 November 2012 - 07:09 AM
#420
Posted 11 January 2013 - 11:52 AM
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users