169 replies to this topic

[Kaemon]

aglarang, on 13 March 2012 - 12:21 PM, said:

Thunderbolt............
(yah, i know its unseen, but the TBolt is awesomesauce.)

Or if I can get my hands on a Star league era Cestus. mmmmmm... guassie goodness.

You sir, have failed the poll.

[Morashtak]

Each fulfill different roles so not to cop out but I'd use most what would be needed most.

As for just aesthetics I would like to see what FD's take on all three is before I choose one.

[Evgeny Bear]

What the hell shall I do with a Facebook poll?
don't have facebook acc in the near future

[tyrone dunkirk]

Axeman! That was one of the coolest designs.... sighhhh. Nostalgia..

[stabwest]

Axeman is only good if we can use melee attacks. of which I've heard we can't. So I'd rather have Jagermech, also the Facebook Poll link doesn't seem to be working, at least not for me anyway.

[Adridos]

Andar89, on 13 March 2012 - 12:28 PM, said:

What the hell shall I do with a Facebook poll?
don't have facebook acc in the near future

Me too, just post your opinion here and throw it away.

[Evgeny Bear]

Ok... facebook is cra...

ah you mean about the Mechs

hmm dunno

Only know the jeagermech from the first Mechcommander, and liked it

[Stone Profit]

Garth Erlam, on 13 March 2012 - 11:58 AM, said:

https://www.facebook...95749623826354/

Options are Axman, Bombardier, JagerMech.

WHAT?!?
NO THUNDERBOLT?
for shame!

given the choices, ill take the axeman

[Orzorn]

That's a difficult choice. The JagerMech fills a position we haven't yet seen filled in MWO, but the Axman is such a scary close up mech. The armor on the JagerMech is absolutely disgusting, however, but the speed on the Axman is lacking. If I recall, the Axman also has heat issues.

Still, I think I'd have to go with the awesome that is the Axman. Because, come on, it has an axe.

[Hador]

Bombardier is a nice support Mech

[verybad]

Hador, on 13 March 2012 - 12:38 PM, said:

Bombardier is a nice support Mech

The Catapult is 65 tons, and it is a NICER support mech.

The Axman is damned fragile for a brawler with it's XL engine and mediocre speed.

The clear choice is a Jagermech.

Edited by verybad, 13 March 2012 - 12:45 PM.

[Orion Starion]

Blech, I hate all of those. Give me a T-bolt or Grasshopper.

--Orion Starion

[Hador]

My clear choice would have been a different 65t mech, but from those 3 offered, i pick the Bombardier

[Skwisgaar Skwigelf]

There is only 1 correct answer here.


AXMAN!

[Bluey]

AXEMAN

[wwiiogre]

1: Axman if there is melee
2: Jagermech cause it is iconic and there probably won't be a rifleman
3: Bombardier, uhh don't we already have the catapult and we won't have the Archer so why is this even here?

Crusader, Exterminator and Thunderbolt are missing from these suggestions.

chris

[Saint of Sinners]

The Face book link isn't working for me but I'd go for the Axman.

[Azantia]

Axman
Bombardier
Jagermech

so anti-davion I know.....but i hate the jagermech....I always had to play one for tabletop (opponnent always got to choose some of the mechs you ran in league play from your faction list) and any smart player choose the Jagermech. Why? cause it only had 6 tons of armor! (96 armor points)...JM6-A had slightly more....8 TONS!...what a frickin joke.....

Axman minus the ax just isnt the same, good mech, but it goes into the 2nd slot behind the Bombardier, however, we already have a 65 ton missile boating fire support mech, its called a Catapult, therefore Axman goes back to number one....I would prefer the Thunderbolt, and as i understand the Thunderbolt is "Reseen".

http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Reseen

Thunderbolt would be at the top of my list for 65 ton battlemechs, period.

[Namwons]

Axeman & Catapult = PWNsauce

[Hador]

wwiiogre, on 13 March 2012 - 12:59 PM, said:

Crusader, Exterminator and Thunderbolt are missing from these suggestions.

All of them are great 65t mechs indeed.