Jump to content

Do we need ingame VOIP? A poll...


127 replies to this topic

Poll: Do we need ingame VOIP? A poll... (341 member(s) have cast votes)

Do we need ingame VOIP to experience nice and tactical gameplay?

  1. Yes, it would advance tactical TEAMPLAY! (142 votes [41.64%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 41.64%

  2. No, I wanna play for my own/with my friends on VENT/TS/MUMBLE only! (52 votes [15.25%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 15.25%

  3. I've got nothing against it, as long as I can mute it... (138 votes [40.47%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 40.47%

  4. Don't really know.... (9 votes [2.64%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 2.64%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#121 Helmer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Stone Cold
  • 3,272 posts
  • LocationColumbus, Ga

Posted 19 April 2012 - 06:40 PM

Like many I would love to try and communicate with some of the other people out there, and doubt I would take the effort to connect to a strange TS/Vent server.
In Game would make is much easier. However, I also agree that most likely it would be a feature that be abused.





Cheers.

#122 Rejarial Galatan

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 4,312 posts
  • LocationOutter Periphery

Posted 19 April 2012 - 06:46 PM

Helmer but the thing of it is this. This game with its role warfare is dependant by its own design on rapid, clear communication between the roles. There are players out there who are polarized for some reason against a 3rd party VOIP and refuse to use them. Not having a built in VOIP at somepoint will hinder rapid and clear communication between all team members. I for one in a major firefight cannot take the time to remove my left hand from throttle quad and right hand from joystick simply out of self preservation. Being forced to waste pre-match time getting onto another voip outside the game is a waste of effort and time. Also, not every single player out there will be using the SAME BLOODY 3rd PARTY VOIP.

#123 Ghosth

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 968 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationFargo North Dakota

Posted 21 April 2012 - 03:53 AM

Well I'm going to go back to WOT yet once again, it depends on what kind of game your running.

In WOT, you have random battles, Tank Company Battles, Platoons (2-3 people going into the same random battle) and Clan wars.

Clan wars is almost exclusively done on TS or Vent. (BTW I'm one of those with TS, Vent and Skype. :D )

For platoons I'll commonly hook up on either TS, or Vent with friends so we can coordinate.

Tank Company battles however are almost exclusively done on ingame voip.
Random groups of people thrown together that need to work together to win, that don't have time to hook up to someones TS or Vent server.

Also while I may not use ingame voip often, when I get into a situation where I'm trying to help someone new, and or text just isn't working, I thank god we have it.

As to shutting down comms between other players, even if you kill all voip, you'll still have guys using second computers to communicate, or landlines, or cell phones. And if you do shut down all comms, then those who cheat have a definate advantage.

Leave ingame voip for now, once we have beta released and your getting ready for full release, then is the time to relook if ingame voip is needed, wanted, desired.

In game VOIP may be a pain (hence it must be able to be muted) but its value can be huge in some situations.

#124 Pilot Revant

    Member

  • PipPip
  • 30 posts
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 21 April 2012 - 04:10 AM

My computer will have a hard enough time running the game as it is, let alone running anything else in the background. So I hope there will be a inbuilt system.

Not to mention it will reduce the hassle of organising players to use the right program, not everyone will run the same programs.

#125 Tyrant

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 89 posts

Posted 21 April 2012 - 04:35 AM

View PostSpooky, on 19 April 2012 - 12:28 AM, said:

What do you mean by that?


Cromhounds was a X360 title, the radar / coms worked as follows..

A commander Mech had a radar modual, all team mates inside the range were able to use X360 VOIP / see friends / enemies on radar, when you leave the radar range, you lose both IFF and VOIP.

Capturing static comm towers would create team controlled radar areas.

In premades games we all would join skype on laptops and not have to bring a commander mech.

Spooky, this is why I am against make VOIP a gameplay integrated system.

#126 David Decoster

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 267 posts
  • LocationBrugge, Belgium, Terra

Posted 21 April 2012 - 04:54 AM

There are many good alternatives as opposed to an ingame VOIP, and I expect most hardcore / semi-serious clans and players to use those. Then again, I've got nothing against the idea per se, I just hope they don't 'waste' time on implementing this if that time is required elsewhere. I voted for option 3.

#127 Phoenixfire

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts
  • LocationNew Yorl

Posted 21 April 2012 - 06:17 AM

anybody who has a webcam has a mic so an ingame VOIP would not be a waste. it may make the team aspect better as better communication leads to more strategic battles rather than just degrading into a slug fest

#128 Carebear

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 227 posts

Posted 21 April 2012 - 08:18 AM

Voice commands/orders at least!





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users