TheMittani.com: MWO State of Play
#1
Posted 01 November 2012 - 10:52 AM
Some words on the current state of the game for anyone that's interested.
#2
Posted 01 November 2012 - 11:34 AM
Quote
I laughed.
Edited by RabbidFerret, 01 November 2012 - 11:34 AM.
#3
Posted 01 November 2012 - 11:45 AM
#4
Posted 01 November 2012 - 11:49 AM
Honest about the good and the bad
Edited by Shortbus, 01 November 2012 - 11:49 AM.
#5
Posted 01 November 2012 - 11:50 AM
-netcode (not talking about engine speed, I'm talking about hit registration and lag compensation)
-matchmaking
-etcetectecetc as someone who went through the trial experience, earning 12,000,000+ through it, it was really badly designed, especially incentive wise
Edited by RoyalWave, 01 November 2012 - 11:55 AM.
#6
Posted 01 November 2012 - 11:52 AM
#8
Posted 01 November 2012 - 12:01 PM
Tickdoff Tank, on 01 November 2012 - 11:52 AM, said:
Caring about payed review.. also you are implying the opinion of a payed "gaming journalist" has more weight then that of a gamer?
I hope you enjoy your 9.4 points on asscreed3 or 9.9 on any future CoD title.
#9
Posted 01 November 2012 - 12:03 PM
hornet331, on 01 November 2012 - 12:01 PM, said:
Caring about payed review.. also you are implying the opinion of a payed "gaming journalist" has more weight then that of a gamer?
I hope you enjoy your 9.4 points on asscreed3 or 9.9 on any future CoD title.
I am implying that reviews are not worth reading, especially on the internet. There are no checks and balances. No accountability. Newspaper reviews are as useful as toilet paper, internet revies are worth less. Try the product yourself, form your own opinion.
My opinion of MWO is that it is a great game, I love it. Do you care what I think?
#10
Posted 01 November 2012 - 12:08 PM
#12
Posted 01 November 2012 - 12:09 PM
Tickdoff Tank, on 01 November 2012 - 12:03 PM, said:
I am implying that reviews are not worth reading, especially on the internet. There are no checks and balances. No accountability. Newspaper reviews are as useful as toilet paper, internet revies are worth less. Try the product yourself, form your own opinion.
My opinion of MWO is that it is a great game, I love it. Do you care what I think?
No people dont care what you think but a lot of people actually do care and pay attention to what theMittani has to say.
Sorry bud.
#13
Posted 01 November 2012 - 12:15 PM
Quote
truth.
#14
Posted 01 November 2012 - 12:19 PM
RoyalWave, on 01 November 2012 - 11:50 AM, said:
-netcode (not talking about engine speed, I'm talking about hit registration and lag compensation)
-matchmaking
-etcetectecetc as someone who went through the trial experience, earning 12,000,000+ through it, it was really badly designed, especially incentive wise
Well yeah, it has problems. I fill a PARAGRAPH with problems, just not the specific ones you mention there. Maybe I'm just a glass half full guy, but I like and enjoy this game and I'm looking forward to seeing how it ends up.
#15
Posted 01 November 2012 - 12:35 PM
Psykosis, on 01 November 2012 - 12:15 PM, said:
Truth
#16
Posted 01 November 2012 - 12:36 PM
hornet331, on 01 November 2012 - 12:01 PM, said:
Caring about payed review.. also you are implying the opinion of a payed "gaming journalist" has more weight then that of a gamer?
I hope you enjoy your 9.4 points on asscreed3 or 9.9 on any future CoD title.
Also for clarity, I am unpaid.
#17
Posted 01 November 2012 - 12:43 PM
Good post fil!
#19
Posted 01 November 2012 - 01:06 PM
wanderer, on 01 November 2012 - 12:08 PM, said:
You're new to this corner of the world we call "The Internet", right? That's why you just called that a no-name reviewer.
This got me curious - I am certainly not new to this corner of the world, but I've never heard about Fil5000 before...did I miss something important?
#20
Posted 01 November 2012 - 01:09 PM
IceSerpent, on 01 November 2012 - 01:06 PM, said:
This got me curious - I am certainly not new to this corner of the world, but I've never heard about Fil5000 before...did I miss something important?
Nope, I'm nobody - I think people thought it was Mittens himself writing the review, hence my clarification.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users