Favourite 'Unseen' battlemechs to be 'Reseen' in MWO and would you pay for them?
#21
Posted 16 April 2012 - 11:54 AM
But yeah, I voted for adding the Unseen mechs with whatever redesign is required. These machines are too crucial to the Battletech lore. Stuff like the Warhammer IS Battletech for too many people. Plus they're just really good designs, not only in terms of visuals but their roles, properties, and loadouts. Some of them have really nice histories as well within the Battletech fiction.
#22
Posted 16 April 2012 - 12:26 PM
#23
Posted 16 April 2012 - 02:02 PM
#24
Posted 17 April 2012 - 12:15 AM
Angelicon, on 16 April 2012 - 12:26 PM, said:
Dragorath, on 16 April 2012 - 02:02 PM, said:
Sorry that there is only one mech to vote for, but based on what I mentioned before I will not open poll question 3 for multiple selections; however, you are very welcome to rank your top 5 or top 10 choices of 'Unseen'/'Reseen' mechs in the thread ...
I must confess being a little bit surprised about the lack of 'love' for the humanoid light mechs (I thought there would be some BattleTech novel readers that vote at least for the Valkyrie) and the 'Griffin', although, personally, I am not too fond of the latter (it looks pretty nifty though) ... the Longbow is probably not so much associated with the lore as the other models listed ...
#25
Posted 17 April 2012 - 04:36 AM
Quote
I don't feel this strongly about the Unseen. I would love to see them, but it's also cool seeing a whole bunch of previously unappreciated, more obscure IS designs getting into the game. It's on the "really nice to have but largely unnecessary" feature list.
The Marauder, Rifleman and Warhammer are the ones I want to see most; it does also help that the Marauder is apparently the most prolific IS Heavy in the pre-Invasion era. I wouldn't mind seeing a Locust, either.
I will say, however, that the Reseen Rifleman and Locust are both good-looking 'Mechs and I would be happy with their inclusion in any design.
Apparently "a future announcement" will determine whether or not we'll see these things. Let's wait until then, no?
Edited by barcode, 17 April 2012 - 04:38 AM.
#26
Posted 17 April 2012 - 12:25 PM
#27
Posted 17 April 2012 - 05:15 PM
#28
Posted 18 April 2012 - 06:50 PM
#29
Posted 21 April 2012 - 10:02 AM
With regard to the 'Unseen' mech type, the lead of the Marauder over the Warhammer has melted a little bit, but is still notable (over 25% versus over 20% of all poll takers) and then the leads are very narrow, third spot for the Phoenix Hawk just ahead of the Shadow Hawk and the Thunderbolt and the latter are closely followed by the BattleMaster now ... then there is a little gap (2 votes) difference to the Crusader, Archer, and Rifleman models ...
.. well, wishing all those, who have not placed their votes yet, a happy voting ...
#30
Posted 21 April 2012 - 05:32 PM
#31
Posted 22 April 2012 - 01:36 AM
#33
Posted 22 April 2012 - 02:39 AM
#34
Posted 22 April 2012 - 04:50 AM
#35
Posted 23 April 2012 - 09:34 AM
Edited by DavidHurricane, 23 April 2012 - 09:37 AM.
#36
Posted 23 April 2012 - 11:36 PM
.. don't do it PGI. Don't, please. Seriously. Too many awesome 'mech projects have died for tinkering around with questionable art, and we've got so many awesome 'mechs to choose from... I don't want anything done with even the smallest chance of a legal backlash against you. It's a no win scenario, period.
Hulldown, on 22 April 2012 - 01:36 AM, said:
The Commando is not only not unseen, but confirmed in MWO. So hopefully you'll be a little happy?
#37
Posted 24 April 2012 - 01:09 AM
Alright. Phoenix Hawk. Give me my Phoenix Hawk and I'll be a happy mechwarrior.
#38
Posted 24 April 2012 - 05:11 PM
#39
Posted 25 April 2012 - 01:18 AM
I mean, without the Marauder, you can't even explain the IS name for the Timber Wolf, Mad Cat. That's because it's a mix between the MAD Marauder and the CAT Catapult... ; _ ;
On the other hand, I'd rather have them kept out if trying to put them in risks lawsuits and the end of this thing....
#40
Posted 26 April 2012 - 06:03 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users