19 replies to this topic

[HC Harlequin]

An expanded poll from http://mwomercs.com/...implementation/

[Tykelau]

I would like to see team damage done per match personally.

[HC Harlequin]

You mean like..
average damage to team members per match when team damage is >0
max damage to ....
average number of team members damaged ....
max number of team members damaged...

[Xervitus]

Most of these seem...really not that relevant.

[Adrienne Vorton]

i´d like to add:

damage on capturing mech(defense damage)
damage while capturing base (capture damage)
capturing mechs killed (defense kill)
mechs killed while capturing ( capture kill )
time (in seconds?) interrupting enemy capture (time in friendly capture zone while enemies try to capture)

and stuff like that^^

i want those not only to be stats btw, but also to be rewarded, so that might encourage ppl to RTB....

Edited by Adrienne Vorton, 16 November 2012 - 03:55 AM.

[Sean von Steinike]

Xervitus, on 16 November 2012 - 03:13 AM, said:

Most of these seem...really not that relevant.

Kinda like k/d ratios and the rest of the stats we already have.

[Tykelau]

All preferably, though I was thinking average team damage per match (>0 yadda yadda).

Adrienne Vorton, on 16 November 2012 - 03:53 AM, said:

damage on capturing mech(defense damage)
damage while capturing base (capture damage)
capturing mechs killed (defense kill)
mechs killed while capturing ( capture kill )
time (in seconds?) interrupting enemy capture (time in friendly capture zone while enemies try to capture)

These seem like an excellent idea.


maybe individual mech stats also.

Edited by Tykelau, 16 November 2012 - 04:20 AM.

[Velba]

Another great Poll!

I personally went ahead and voted for everything except for the "Maximum" ones. The reason behind that is, I would hate to see the internet-tuffguy-minmaxers trying to get the best stats etc.etc. If we keep it at averages, it would create less of a "stat-storm" game play, if you guys get my drift. Or at least that would be my hope.



OP go work at PGI....

[Grraarrgghh]

I just want to know my damage breakdown by weapon/hardpoint.

[Stormur Herra]

Grraarrgghh, on 16 November 2012 - 08:52 AM, said:

I just want to know my damage breakdown by weapon/hardpoint.

OMG YES!!1!

When I put Streak SRMs on my 3 energy/1missile commando, I really wanted to know if I was gaining enough damage to justify the lost heatsink and armor or if enough to be better than having an AMS. I had no way to tell how much the streaks were doing or if they were just dead weight.

I imagine this is even more of a thing on mechs with more hardpoints.

[Belorion]

idc and idc...

[HC Harlequin]

Shameless bump for more votes
updated poll to come

[New Day]

bump for glory

[stimpeh]

I'd rather have a working netcode...

[BulletChief]

where is the "i don't want any stats" option?

[HC Harlequin]

Will add removing stats altogether from future polls

[Gristle]

the only stats I would really, really like to see is at the end of the match, who killed me from which chassis, with what weapon, to what section, for how much damage. I would also like to see a battlelog showing map name, my team, enemy team, mechs, and results of match.

[HC Harlequin]

People are rehashing some of this like a new wheel, so I thought I would dig it up

[sg spider]

I think there should be 'effective damage'. Its like you dealt 500dmg, but nothing of it helped to destroy smth = 0 eff. dmg.
Im trying to say, its should be more then just damage.
K/D is ok, everything about money is ok.

[Eddrick]

Personaly, individual total damage or DPS doesn't matter much. I want to see the damage to the Center Torso and Head. The parts that matter most to me. I go for kills. I don't care much about how much damage someone can do, if the damage isn't in a lethal spot.