Quad Laser: Running Your Cataphract Straight And Simple.
#1
Posted 25 November 2012 - 03:10 PM
The solution is the Quad Laser.
Yes, it's a lot like the Moonite one. Slow, but ooh does it pack a wallop.
Take your -1X or -2X or -3D. Strip them. Upgrade them to DHS.
Mount a 250 rated standard engine. You're looking at about 57.8 kph on the ground.
Mount four large lasers- and the 'Phract will take 19-20 DHS on the chassis to go with them.
The -1X can get 20 on there, while you may want AMS and 19 DHS on the other two- or jump jets, in the -3D's case. You'll have a few tons to spare for whatever, as long as it fits in the CT/legs/head.
Fire the arm mounts on low-odds shots. Add the torso lasers when it's a good one, and watch the Quad Laser burn away armor like nobody's business- and with that many DHS, it can actually manage 3 alpha strikes before getting worrisome. Three shots to the same spot will burn an Atlas off at the side torso, and headshotting Cats is not hard with this design (never mind the arms, which burn off in two shots).
Will you win points for creativity? Not at all. But you'll hurt things. Lots. And that's good. And it's one of the cheaper configs to repair, too. Remember to smoke as you shoot the bird.
#2
Posted 25 November 2012 - 04:31 PM
#3
Posted 25 November 2012 - 09:01 PM
Might need to try it myself when I get a CTF-1X.
#4
Posted 25 November 2012 - 11:18 PM
Even in Caustic if you manage your heat you can be very effective.
Add the speed tweak from elite, and the heat skills from basic and it is even better.
#6
Posted 26 November 2012 - 04:29 AM
#7
Posted 26 November 2012 - 05:08 AM
I love the idea of blazing around in the much speedier Dragon while I melt mechs into heaps of slag.
#8
Posted 26 November 2012 - 05:12 AM
#9
Posted 26 November 2012 - 06:28 AM
Mithos, on 26 November 2012 - 05:12 AM, said:
Then I'm thinking about picking up a 1C.
I've never seen anyone talk about boating a DRG that way, is there something I'm missing that makes it a bad idea? I'm thinking good mobility, hard to hit side torso bits, and 4 LLAS = win. But my math has been sketchy in the past.
#10
Posted 26 November 2012 - 07:09 AM
Resulting, its easier to track fast-runners with arm-mounting lasers on a dragon, but harder to converge all 4 LL's for an alpha or chain than on K2. And dragon is hotter.
#11
Posted 26 November 2012 - 07:50 AM
#12
Posted 26 November 2012 - 08:44 AM
#13
Posted 26 November 2012 - 08:57 AM
-61 movement speed
-Heat efficiency 1.39
-5 Alphas in a row before overheat
-Quick heat reduction, with some pacing unlimited alphas
-Weapons in arms for better aim (side effect lose arms lose weapons)
So compared to the cataprach, you get higher movement speed and maneuverability, better heat control, higher armor / durability and more firepower overall because of the better heat management. If quad large laser is your desired build, it's simply foolish to get anything but the atlas RS model.
#14
Posted 26 November 2012 - 09:43 AM
MadPanda, on 26 November 2012 - 08:57 AM, said:
-61 movement speed
-Heat efficiency 1.39
-5 Alphas in a row before overheat
-Quick heat reduction, with some pacing unlimited alphas
-Weapons in arms for better aim (side effect lose arms lose weapons)
So compared to the cataprach, you get higher movement speed and maneuverability, better heat control, higher armor / durability and more firepower overall because of the better heat management. If quad large laser is your desired build, it's simply foolish to get anything but the atlas RS model.
And it's an assault. It's also not a Cataphract, so good luck skilling up your heavy piloting effs with that 100-ton Lyran scout.
The fun thing about quad lasering is that it works for all three variants, pretty much the same way. The only one it doesn't is the -4X, naturally. The -1X can put three lasers in the arms, the other two spread them out nicely and pretty much require you to core the 'Mech to stop it shooting. The -3D is also the only one that can pull it off a 4-LL layout and jump without being an oven.
And yes, you want to sit there chain-firing or snapping off shots from two lasers at a time until you line up a good shot.
Then fire all four and watch the armor melting away.
#15
Posted 26 November 2012 - 09:54 AM
MadPanda, on 26 November 2012 - 08:57 AM, said:
-61 movement speed
-Heat efficiency 1.39
-5 Alphas in a row before overheat
-Quick heat reduction, with some pacing unlimited alphas
-Weapons in arms for better aim (side effect lose arms lose weapons)
So compared to the cataprach, you get higher movement speed and maneuverability, better heat control, higher armor / durability and more firepower overall because of the better heat management. If quad large laser is your desired build, it's simply foolish to get anything but the atlas RS model.
Quad LL K2 cata has 78.5kph (w/o elite skill, 84.4 after feat unlock) @ 1.24 Heat efficiency (315XL, 19DHS, ES).
I never tried to drop ES, degrade to smaller engine and stuff more heatsinks due personal speedaholism, but wouldn't it still be much faster and maneurable than atli with ~1.39 efficiency?
And yes, its not a phract too. Sorry for hijacking thread )
Edited by Mithos, 26 November 2012 - 09:58 AM.
#16
Posted 26 November 2012 - 09:56 AM
#17
Posted 26 November 2012 - 10:09 AM
Mithos, on 26 November 2012 - 09:54 AM, said:
Quad LL K2 cata has 78.5kph (w/o elite skill, 84.4 after feat unlock) @ 1.24 Heat efficiency (315XL, 19DHS, ES).
I never tried to drop ES, degrade to smaller engine and stuff more heatsinks due personal speedaholism, but wouldn't it still be much faster and maneurable than atli with ~1.39 efficiency?
And yes, its not a phract too. Sorry for hijacking thread )
It would be faster but the 1.24 to 1.39 heat efficiency is a big difference. Only thing that makes quad LL work is the heat efficiency. If you can't be shooting virtually without a break then you might as well strap in 2 gauss in there. I personally don't like energy weapon builds that force you to take a break. It's lethal to you when faced with multiple enemies.
@Wanderer: Sorry just providing an option. No need to get heated up.
#18
Posted 26 November 2012 - 10:19 AM
#19
Posted 26 November 2012 - 11:20 AM
MadPanda, on 26 November 2012 - 10:09 AM, said:
Relax, I use un-nerfed DHS when forum posting!
It's more a matter of "Hey, this is a simple, effective, incredibly straightforward build to slap on a 'Phract you're grinding while getting good firepower and minimal repair costs.".
Truth is, the only one that was cheaper and effective for me was the -4X quad AC/2 build. I was regularly seeing 20K repair bills.
#20
Posted 26 November 2012 - 11:24 AM
Untill they nurf it there is no reason to not put a Gauss on a mech if there is room it always is worth its weight in tons and ammo.
6 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users