Captain Midnight, on 27 November 2012 - 03:30 PM, said:
A lot of Neville Chamberlain-esque apologists telling us about how it's not pay2win even though at this point it's prettttty obvious.
Tell me, what mech configuration would you say is irrefutably P2W? I think if this new hero mech isn't across the line, it certainly is the line.

I generally dislike image macros, but my God, this calls for one. You're totally right, this pretty much
is the line. Anything more than this and I'll get bothered.
CodeNameValtus, on 27 November 2012 - 02:30 PM, said:
When you figure out that you can't actually make this happen....then you can come back down to reality...
With 3 Gauss, you are limping around at 23.1 kph (if they let you go down to STD 100 engine, and you can only carry maximum 3 tons of ammo....oh and you're ~4.5 tons underarmored...
Have fun being a statue that's made out of paper mache in a game where armor is king.
This is pretty much why it doesn't bother me. The Yen Lo Wang only got me until the D came around, because it was the fastest medium in the game.
The 3 Gauss thing is such a huge tradeoff it doesn't bother me nearly as much as it would if this was being offered on, say, an Atlas that could actually
run 3 Gauss. Then I'd be here screaming bloody murder.
Like I just joked about, this is literally standing on the line between me being OK with it and me being actually pissed. They've got to be really, really careful with this hero 'mech stuff in the future, in particular if they're going to make up variants like this.
Edited by Victor Morson, 27 November 2012 - 08:00 PM.