Ppc Min Range Has To Go
#1
Posted 30 November 2012 - 12:36 AM
Of course I just stand there and take my time lining up shots while they pound away at me and overheat.
Either the min range has to go, or the PPC should be taken off any trial mech they are equiped on.
I would imagine not doing damage at point blank range would tick off a few new players.
Just sayin....since there is no possible way they could know this info in game.
#2
Posted 30 November 2012 - 12:38 AM
the only time I have a problem is when im close enough that it makes my arm point another direction
Ive tested it on afk mechs and I can usually get within 10 meters and still do damage
#3
Posted 30 November 2012 - 12:40 AM
yashmack, on 30 November 2012 - 12:38 AM, said:
the only time I have a problem is when im close enough that it makes my arm point another direction
Ive tested it on afk mechs and I can usually get within 10 meters and still do damage
Under 90m the standard PPC will not do any damage. You might see the typical effect, but there is no damage from the impact.
Edited by Taizan, 30 November 2012 - 12:41 AM.
#4
Posted 30 November 2012 - 12:40 AM
Though I agree with you, something has to be done with PPC's. I've spent extensive time incorporating them into my builds and with one exception they haven't had a place. In 19/20 there is another weapon that will do the job better.
I think having DHS at 2.0 would go A LONG way towards making the weapon have a place among all the ballistics and large lasers I've been seeing today.
#5
Posted 30 November 2012 - 12:40 AM
Taizan, on 30 November 2012 - 12:40 AM, said:
AHA, there it is....
Remove minimum range on PPC. I for one never use it because of that. So it has become a shelved weapon because of that 90 meter joke of a minimum range. Also, add more damage to ERPPC for those that suffer the extra heat for a little extra range. This way both weapons will be desirable.
Edited by Teralitha, 30 November 2012 - 12:47 AM.
#6
Posted 30 November 2012 - 12:42 AM
Teralitha, on 30 November 2012 - 12:40 AM, said:
seems like youre under the same impression I am, I dont think the PPC has a minimum range currently, even though everyone seems to think it does...
I will find out when I get home from work and test it
Edited by yashmack, 30 November 2012 - 12:42 AM.
#7
Posted 30 November 2012 - 12:43 AM
PPC: 3 cases min, 18 cases max.
1 case is 30m = 90m min range on PPC is canon.
Knowing your weapons is part of being successful...or if you wanna make your forum name sound true.
And...just for you...the technology-level went up to 2, there is the ER PPC...no minimum range, extened max range...just a tick more heat.
#8
Posted 30 November 2012 - 12:48 AM
Cole Allard, on 30 November 2012 - 12:43 AM, said:
PPC: 3 cases min, 18 cases max.
1 case is 30m = 90m min range on PPC is canon.
Knowing your weapons is part of being successful...or if you wanna make your forum name sound true.
And...just for you...the technology-level went up to 2, there is the ER PPC...no minimum range, extened max range...just a tick more heat.
I can tell you that using a standard PPC I have caused damage at less than 90 meters, I have caused damage at 10m with a stock non extended range PPC...
but again, I will test it when I get home, I may be mistaken or something... lol
#9
Posted 30 November 2012 - 12:49 AM
Cole Allard, on 30 November 2012 - 12:43 AM, said:
PPC: 3 cases min, 18 cases max.
1 case is 30m = 90m min range on PPC is canon.
Knowing your weapons is part of being successful...or if you wanna make your forum name sound true.
And...just for you...the technology-level went up to 2, there is the ER PPC...no minimum range, extened max range...just a tick more heat.
To ******* hell with canon
#10
Posted 30 November 2012 - 12:52 AM
Which also means at 45m, you'll be doing 5 damage.
#11
Posted 30 November 2012 - 12:53 AM
Ace367, on 30 November 2012 - 12:52 AM, said:
Which also means at 45m, you'll be doing 5 damage.
Dont ya think that is a little redundant? just a little? 5 damage at 45 meters? seriously? ****
Btw I think that is wrong. From 0-90m it does zero. Just flashes the enemy paper doll and makes u think its doing something
Edited by Teralitha, 30 November 2012 - 12:54 AM.
#12
Posted 30 November 2012 - 12:56 AM
I did take a small amount of damage, but I think that was from his medium lasers he probably shot at the same time as his ppc's.
#13
Posted 30 November 2012 - 12:56 AM
Personally I think it makes it slightly unique compared with the ERPPC, even though it may or may not make actual sense.
(ERPPC gives you more heat, but doesn't have minimum range)
And doesn't the trial Awesome use ERPPCs instead?
Edited by Ace367, 30 November 2012 - 01:02 AM.
#14
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:01 AM
#15
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:32 AM
#16
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:33 AM
Secondly the current "Trial awesome" Runs ERPPC's which have no minimum range.
#17
Posted 30 November 2012 - 03:03 AM
Ace367, on 30 November 2012 - 12:52 AM, said:
Which also means at 45m, you'll be doing 5 damage.
Is it implemented that way with a linear drop off? I never had the impression that it does any damage at all under 90m,
#18
Posted 30 November 2012 - 03:17 AM
Ace367, on 30 November 2012 - 12:52 AM, said:
Which also means at 45m, you'll be doing 5 damage.
This.
In CB i often killed mechs at well under 90m with only PPC's.
#19
Posted 30 November 2012 - 03:39 AM
Teralitha, on 30 November 2012 - 12:49 AM, said:
To ******* hell with canon
Ohky...I see...
Then, saying that the PPC will get a secondary effect (EMP bziiiing when hitting enemy = lost of target lock + cockpit going "bling bling") will not interest you?!?
Ok then.
Stay into your little world, use weapons you dont understand. This is like giving an M82 to a prehistoric caveman. Yes, you point that end over there...and you pull there.
http://www.sarna.net/wiki/PPC
Just in case...you actually want to read something about it. Did that sound snobbish? Sorry, wasnt my intend.
EDIT changed the M88 (thats a sort of carrier tank into M82 what make more sense )
Edited by Cole Allard, 30 November 2012 - 03:40 AM.
#20
Posted 30 November 2012 - 03:39 AM
A PPC is, in fact, a ballistic weapon which does not require ammo, cannot explode, is way lighter than the other ballistic weapon of the same damage (or has the same weight with a more than appropriate number of DHS, IF it's your 2nd PPC), and can be mounted in mechs without ballistic slots, which is, nearly every mech (all current chassis have energy slots except the Cat-A1, and all upcoming do, except if the CN9-AH is reintroduced).
They must have SOME disadvantage versus an AC10.
Which is the minimum range in case of the PPC and the heat in case of the ERPPC.
And that's why I say if you drop one of those "canon nerfs" they would be overpowered.
The AWS-9M overheats so easily because it carries 3 ER PPCs. With 3 Standard PPCs it would be a decent Mech, as it has 20 DHS of which 12 are engine-mounted, so it has the equivalent of 35.2 single HS.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users