3036 replies to this topic

[Sacrosanct]

https://www.facebook...rOnline?fref=ts

[anonymous175]

In before thread merge and next thread OP makes that claims previous thread was deleted.

[LordBraxton]

8CH Trooper, on 04 March 2013 - 05:50 PM, said:

If anyone thought that this was going to stay a f2p game and never have p2w implemented at some point was seriously deluding themselves.

Im guilty I guess, I actually expected better.

[BladeSplint]

http://mwomercs.com/...my-thread-mods/

prepare to be assimilated

[Fooooo]

My post is somewhere in here now........as I was going to add....


I would prefer these type of things in a skill tree. Where choosing 1 locks you out of the others. IE

Teir 1.

Coolant Flush Module - Speed Tweak - Weapon Tweak


Choosing 1 of those, locks you out of the other 2 for that variant. Gives the player a choice.

Do you get the extra cooling via consumable ? Or do you want more speed ? Or slightly faster cooldown on your weapons ? Because you can't have all 3.


With more and more teirs after that. All seperate for each variant. Etc etc.

As I said in my other post, I don't like where this is going to lead. It will be pretty much a 100% use thing, so just another cbill sink.

Edited by Fooooo, 04 March 2013 - 05:58 PM.

[Volume]

[Skizzak]

Threads inside of threads talking about those threads inside of the other threads.

THREADCEPTION

I have no idea whats going on

[CutterWolf]

[Harmin]

I don't think it does much good to be honest. A 35% flush of heat? That's not very worth while in my opinion. What does that translate to in damage? At best 20-30. MWO is very lenient when it comes to heat. Internals don't blow up, jumping doesn't seem to generate heat either. If you have troubles managing your heat throughout then a small reduction will not make any odds. You'll still run too hot.

I'm much more interested in how much damage artillery and air strikes will do.

[Helmer]

Astroniomix, on 04 March 2013 - 05:45 PM, said:

Was deleting the polls necessary?

Unfortunately, when you merge posts polls are lost. As I am just getting home and jumping into the thick of things, I am unsure who merged everything. I have a suspicion it was someone who was unaware of that merge issue. Again, I cannot confirm it as of now, sorry.

Sorry the polls got merged-deleted. I agree, they were great statistical data. I voted No to as many as I could (on my phone no less).


Cheers.

[Hekalite]

There are several possilities here:
1) The C-bill option is better. So if that's the case, they should make the MC option the same because doing so would tempt more people to buy the MC option.

2) The MC option is better. This is pay to win so they should make the MC option the same because failing to do so will cause people to quit, resulting in fewer overall MC purchases.

3) Neither option is really better. But in this situation, personal preference will lean you one way or the other, meaning that you will likely either not by the MC version or be pissed off at a perceived pay to win advantage.

I can understand adding variation to an MC only hero mech, but this serves no purpose unless it's pay to win.

[General Taskeen]

Sooo... why not just have a Coolant Pod for the Mech Lab? 1 ton, 1 crit.

One more lost opportunity for the best selling point of this game IMO (customizing Mechs in the Mech Lab).

[Enig]

PGI please listen and don't lock. We are the people that invest the most money to your game. You have individuals that don't invest, and then you have the golden gooses that spend upwards to 400+ USD per year on your game.

Don't lose us because of greed.

[BetaBear]

Pretty much. I've paid more than your standard game for MWO, but I certainly don't want things like this. Pay to win isn't enjoyable. Consumables? Really?

[JohnoBurr]

RedDragon, on 04 March 2013 - 05:44 PM, said:

Ok, this is the very first time I'm really pi**ed about PGI and their decisions, especially their forum policy.

Just to keep the guys in here informed: Results as of 5 pm PST before the topics were merged and my poll deleted: 400 votes, 75% against coolant flush, 25% for coolant flush.

Edit: @Niko: If you were interested in user opinions, you wouldn't have deleted the poll that gave you empirical evidence that 3/4 of your customers don't like coolant flush.

[JEB8753]

agreed this is gonna end just like WOT

[Mystere]

Mystere, on 04 March 2013 - 05:54 PM, said:

I am not part of your "WE". Change the title or I will report you.

You have 60 seconds.

60 seconds are up. Reported.

[Primetimex]

Sooooo .... does this mean if I'm loaded up, I can basically SPAM air/artillery strikes my way to victory??? So then why even bother shooting them at all - just spot them and rain death on enemies - no need for coolant flush then! ^^

[Grrzoot]

Larth, on 04 March 2013 - 05:54 PM, said:

Case of the PPC stalker, fire once. Coolant AND override. Fire second time, shutdown. If they override, well they are so far in the red by now they'd probably melt their own engine and insta die or for the cannibals out there, well you have your House of choice. Would you like some fried Kuritan. How about Rasalhague flambe. Baked Davion. Broiled Steiner. Oooh oooh how about some Steamed Liao. And Marik soup du jour.

i dont go for the 6 i run 4 if i run it at all, and i could definately benefit. My point isnt the specific build , but what it allows to become common in builds which is beyond what they wanted with role-warfare, will work against role-warfare.

[jakucha]

Sacrosanct, on 04 March 2013 - 05:54 PM, said:

https://www.facebook...rOnline?fref=ts

Yes, show your nerdrage to all your friends and family as well.