Jakob Knight, on 11 December 2012 - 07:46 AM, said:
This is an example of how those who are defending ECM simply don't know what they are talking about. Besides the fact that there is no reason to bring up 18th century support weaponry, in canon, Guardian ECM does not stop Streaks from working, and no ECM system prevents an enemy from locking onto a target or the use of standard LRMs in the slightest.
And, I find it interesting that the people screaming 'adapt' (who have already proven they can't earlier in this thread) are the same ones who cried a river that they couldn't cope with LRMs, even with thread after thread proving that all they had to do was take one of many counteractions to do so.
No, the people who are defending ECM are simply children who don't want their new candy taken away. And nothing else.
Didn't they stop going strictly by canon when they veered away from the tt rules?
Before making sweeping statements about those defending it you should know some facts. Not everyone defending ECM plays it. I still have not loaded up an ECM module in any of my mechs yet still defend it. Am I the only one out there? No. Is there a certain percentage out there that has found a new toy and doesn't want it taken away? Of course. It's like if I said the only people wanting to take away ECM from the game are little children who want their SSRM/LRM love boats back, and nothing else. Sweeping statements solve nothing.