Pgi Could Sue These Guys
#1
Posted 15 December 2012 - 02:59 AM
#2
Posted 15 December 2012 - 03:01 AM
#3
Posted 15 December 2012 - 03:02 AM
FrupertApricot, on 15 December 2012 - 02:59 AM, said:
Sadly I don't think marketing plans fall under copyright protection.
That game is being created by a developer called Splash Damage and a publisher called WarChest neither of which have anything to do with PGI/IGP.
I doubt it will be anywhere near as successful as the founders program was for MWO - there's no prior install base to draw from.
Edited by TruePoindexter, 15 December 2012 - 12:36 PM.
#4
Posted 15 December 2012 - 03:03 AM
MW:O
Planetside 2
EoN
This game of yours
and many more.
#5
Posted 15 December 2012 - 03:04 AM
Captain Midnight, on 15 December 2012 - 03:01 AM, said:
For what? Battletech is far older that WoT. As for the F2P economy being set up similar... well like I said marketing and business plans as far as I know do not fall under copyright protection.
Adridos, on 15 December 2012 - 03:03 AM, said:
MW:O
Planetside 2
EoN
This game of yours
and many more.
MWO's success has really bolstered the concept.
#6
Posted 15 December 2012 - 03:06 AM
#7
Posted 15 December 2012 - 03:06 AM
Quote
iseewhatyoudidthere.jpg
#8
Posted 15 December 2012 - 03:09 AM
FrupertApricot, on 15 December 2012 - 02:59 AM, said:
So what if they're copying Piranha's 3 Founder choice plan? It isn't MechWarrior. Lol at your "Pgi could sue these guys" line. Copying a business model or some font text/colors isn't something anyone cares about.
#9
Posted 15 December 2012 - 03:11 AM
#11
Posted 15 December 2012 - 03:19 AM
#12
Posted 15 December 2012 - 03:25 AM
I know this was in jest, but lets remember that progress begets progress, and it's better to share in our success than stifle knowledge for sake of pride
Edited by S3dition, 15 December 2012 - 03:26 AM.
#13
Posted 15 December 2012 - 03:29 AM
Captain Midnight, on 15 December 2012 - 03:06 AM, said:
The games share similar economies, business models, and UI layouts. This could be because of copying and it could be because it just plain works. I'm thinking it's a little bit of both. Either way a lawsuit would just waste money from both companies and likely bankrupt them.
I don't appreciate nor understand your tone. Did I perhaps step on your foot as a child?
#14
Posted 15 December 2012 - 03:43 AM
TruePoindexter, on 15 December 2012 - 03:29 AM, said:
I don't appreciate nor understand your tone. Did I perhaps step on your foot as a child?
Come, let's be gentlemen. Both points were made, and now we can respect them. No need to be personal
#15
Posted 15 December 2012 - 03:51 AM
TruePoindexter, on 15 December 2012 - 03:29 AM, said:
I don't appreciate nor understand your tone. Did I perhaps step on your foot as a child?
You are an obnoxious white knight blind to the truth for 1853 posts an counting. Keep it up I didn't see your post count before I called you out, obviously attempting to change anything to do with you is futile.
#16
Posted 15 December 2012 - 03:52 AM
FrupertApricot, on 15 December 2012 - 02:59 AM, said:
Bah, Legendary gives you a t-shirt, they're totally different!
#17
Posted 15 December 2012 - 03:58 AM
They also have $240 and $320 founders packs.
#18
Posted 15 December 2012 - 03:59 AM
#19
Posted 15 December 2012 - 04:01 AM
#20
Posted 15 December 2012 - 04:01 AM
TruePoindexter, on 15 December 2012 - 03:29 AM, said:
I don't appreciate nor understand your tone. Did I perhaps step on your foot as a child?
Captain Midnight, on 15 December 2012 - 03:51 AM, said:
You both made your point. Can we please halt personal attacks here? Really, if you both choose to stop, you both win . The internet is a vast place, and nobody is right or wrong on it.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users