Obvious Fail Is Fail
#1
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:53 AM
I OVERHEATED BEFORE THEY DID. THEY ARE ON THE RECEIVING END OF GIANT FLAMETHROWERS AND I OVERHEAT AND THEY DON'T.
OMMGGGGGGG!!!!
So just exactly HOW does this make any sense? (excluding the fact that 7 flamers is obviously not supposed to be viable). How can I overheat with 40 heatsinks and the enemy doesn't.
#2
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:54 AM
#3
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:55 AM
#4
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:55 AM
J4ckInthebox, on 14 December 2012 - 07:54 AM, said:
I knew they were bad, but I figured "okay, 7 flamers, lets see if I can get someone to overheat". I wouldn't be too sad if it was just that I failed to overheat someone.... but I OVERHEATED! That's just SO fail, haha.
#5
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:57 AM
It is mainly a psychological effect (OMFG FLAMES!!!1!! RUN !!1!) but it works from time to time.
Edited by J4ckInthebox, 14 December 2012 - 07:58 AM.
#6
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:57 AM
J4ckInthebox, on 14 December 2012 - 07:54 AM, said:
I was going to point out how unhelpful this post was and then I realized he's somewhat correct. I assume OP that you didn't realize that Flamers have been identified as non viable by the dev team and is currently (or will soon) be going under review...if you already knew about this fact, why in the hell would you test something that you know is broken?
#7
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:59 AM
Corpsecandle, on 14 December 2012 - 07:57 AM, said:
I was going to point out how unhelpful this post was and then I realized he's somewhat correct. I assume OP that you didn't realize that Flamers have been identified as non viable by the dev team and is currently (or will soon) be going under review...if you already knew about this fact, why in the hell would you test something that you know is broken?
My goal was just to see what I could accomplish by "boating" flamers. I accomplished overheating myself. lol.
#8
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:59 AM
Corpsecandle, on 14 December 2012 - 07:57 AM, said:
I was going to point out how unhelpful this post was and then I realized he's somewhat correct. I assume OP that you didn't realize that Flamers have been identified as non viable by the dev team and is currently (or will soon) be going under review...if you already knew about this fact, why in the hell would you test something that you know is broken?
so that he could come on the forum and post up a thread with "fail" in the title multiple times?
#9
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:59 AM
Quote
They're working on them even now... think from the beginning they've not been effective at all so hopefully they'll get to the point where they are a viable weapon... just have to wait and be patient...
#10
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:00 AM
Useful? Not at the moment, but it is being looked at.
Edited by ThinkTank, 14 December 2012 - 08:01 AM.
#11
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:01 AM
DevilJade, on 14 December 2012 - 07:59 AM, said:
My goal was just to see what I could accomplish by "boating" flamers. I accomplished overheating myself. lol.
no ammo explosions FTW!!!
flamers are as useful as having an ******* right here *points anywhere on my body*
#12
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:01 AM
DevilJade, on 14 December 2012 - 07:55 AM, said:
Even on TT flamers were almost useless.
If we just could set trees on fire or melt the ice in Frozen City...
#13
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:02 AM
Stickjock, on 14 December 2012 - 07:59 AM, said:
They're working on them even now... think from the beginning they've not been effective at all so hopefully they'll get to the point where they are a viable weapon... just have to wait and be patient...
Well that's good... I'm not upset or anything, the whole thing was a joke. I was with a few buddies and came up with the idea and thought I'd try it. I just am shocked at how bad it ended up. They overheat ME more than the enemy lol.
#14
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:02 AM
#15
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:04 AM
#16
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:06 AM
#17
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:07 AM
#18
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:08 AM
#19
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:10 AM
Warrax the Chaos Warrior, on 14 December 2012 - 08:02 AM, said:
Yeah and that makes sense, because somebody sporting a few and overheating enemies would be lame. I wasn't sure I'd accomplish overheating an enemy... but I didn't expect it to backfire so bad and overheat me
#20
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:13 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users