What's The Point Of Non-Atlas Assaults?
#1
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:03 AM
#2
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:05 AM
faster acceleration, quicker turning, etc.
#3
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:05 AM
Edited by J4ckInthebox, 14 December 2012 - 08:31 AM.
#4
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:05 AM
#5
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:06 AM
And if I had to guess, Stalkers 'might' replace the LRM Atlai over time.
Also, if you havn't, give the 9M a go. Very different and better in every way from it's counterparts. I find it very competitve against Atlai. Its the Raven 3L of Awesomes.
#6
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:08 AM
bug3at3r, on 14 December 2012 - 08:06 AM, said:
And if I had to guess, Stalkers 'might' replace the LRM Atlai over time.
Also, if you havn't, give the 9M a go. Very different and better in every way from it's counterparts. I find it very competitve against Atlai. Its the Raven 3L of Awesomes.
Have we decided, finally, that the plural of Atlas is Atlai now?
#7
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:08 AM
#8
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:09 AM
It'll also supercede the awesome as both a laser boat and missile boat, two things the atlas could never really accomplish anyway. The 3Fb variant has ECM and may make an appearance at some point.
It's basically a catapult +20 tons, sans K2, but keeping the whole 'side torsos aren't easy to get at so XLs are decent'. How does that thought not make you cringe? A 6x SRM6 catapult that can engage you well outside that tiny burst window with 4x medium lasers? Or 6x streakers? Or even 6x LRM15s with TAG + lasers?
#10
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:10 AM
#16
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:14 AM
comparing to the Awesome, you have similar number/type of hardpoints, in which case the primary consideration is the Stalker offers additional tonnage.
both the Atlas and the Awesome have something the Stalker lacks: Lateral arm movement.
The differences are not great, but many small details (exact number and placement of hardpoints, speed profile, tonnage, arm actuators, etc) will add up to result in some builds being unique to each chassis. The D-DC offers 3 missile hardpoints in a single location, while most Stalkers offer (at minimum) four in four different locations. A minor difference, but you'll never see a D DC with four SRM6s (and compared to 4xSRM6 Awesome, you have five more tons for ammo and heatsinks and I think more energy hardpoints as well)
#17
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:14 AM
I've never been a fan of the Atlas' hardpoint setup. I've been waiting for the Stalker since it was announced A: because I like the hardpoint layout (you can energy boat, LRM boat, SRM boat, or all three at the same time) and B: because it was my first assault mech purchase in MW2: Mercs.
Edited by EyeOne, 14 December 2012 - 08:16 AM.
#18
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:14 AM
J4ckInthebox, on 14 December 2012 - 08:11 AM, said:
I really don't know where that come from. According to the Oxford English dictionnary, the plural of Atlas is Atlases.
i wont start an English argument, but supposedly some time ago there was a cult following to call them 'Atlai'. If I remember correctly it was spearheaded by DHB
#19
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:16 AM
It will be interesting to see where the Stalker lands. People keep talking about it being a bunker on legs like the Atlas, but it is only 5 tons heavier than an Awesome. It will be interesting to see how people play this mech.
9 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 9 guests, 0 anonymous users